Cargando…

Tendon regeneration and muscle hypotrophy after isolated Gracilis tendon harvesting - a pilot study

PURPOSE: The gracilis tendon (GT) is a commonly used autologous graft in Orthopaedic surgery. The majority of information on knee function and outcomes after hamstring harvest is related to both semitendinosus and GT harvest. Little is known regarding isolated harvest of a GT. It was hypothesized th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flies, Anne, Denecke, Timm, Kraus, Natascha, Kruppa, Philipp, Provencher, Matthew T., Becker, Roland, Kopf, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7138873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32266508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00236-8
_version_ 1783518641489182720
author Flies, Anne
Denecke, Timm
Kraus, Natascha
Kruppa, Philipp
Provencher, Matthew T.
Becker, Roland
Kopf, Sebastian
author_facet Flies, Anne
Denecke, Timm
Kraus, Natascha
Kruppa, Philipp
Provencher, Matthew T.
Becker, Roland
Kopf, Sebastian
author_sort Flies, Anne
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The gracilis tendon (GT) is a commonly used autologous graft in Orthopaedic surgery. The majority of information on knee function and outcomes after hamstring harvest is related to both semitendinosus and GT harvest. Little is known regarding isolated harvest of a GT. It was hypothesized that isolated GT harvest would lead to altered gait patterns (e.g. augmented anterior-posterior translation or rotation in the tibiofemoral joint) and consequently a higher prevalence of cartilage lesions and meniscal tears in knees. METHODS: GT harvesting was performed on patients with chronic acromioclavicular joint instability without previous knee injuries or surgeries. MRI of both knees and thighs were performed. Knee MRI were evaluated using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS). Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities, cross-sectional areas of different muscles, fatty infiltration of the gracilis muscle (GM) and GT regeneration were evaluated. The contralateral limb served as reference. The observers were blinded towards the identity of the patients and the operatively treated side. RESULTS: After a mean time of 44 months after surgery testing was performed on 12 patients. No significant side-to-side differences were found using WORMS, although there was a trend towards increased cartilage lesions after GT harvest (median healthy knee 4.8 and GT harvested knee 7.8 p = 0.086). Inter- and intraobserver repeatability was high with 0.899 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.708–0.960) and 0.988 (95% CI 0.973–0.995), respectively. A significant hypotrophy of the GM with a mean decrease of 25.3%, 18.4% and 16.9% occurred at 25% (p = 0.016), 50% (p = 0.007) and 75% (p = 0.002) of the length of the femur from distal. No compensatory hypertrophy of other thigh muscles or increased fatty infiltration of the GM was found. Tendon regeneration took place in eight out of 12 patients. In case of regeneration, the regenerated tendon inserted in a more proximal place. CONCLUSION: Isolated harvest of the GT for shoulder procedures did not affect knee MRI significantly indicating therefore in general suitable graft utilization for surgeries outside of the knee. GT regenerated in most patients with just a more proximal insertion and a hypotrophy of the muscle belly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7138873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71388732020-04-15 Tendon regeneration and muscle hypotrophy after isolated Gracilis tendon harvesting - a pilot study Flies, Anne Denecke, Timm Kraus, Natascha Kruppa, Philipp Provencher, Matthew T. Becker, Roland Kopf, Sebastian J Exp Orthop Research PURPOSE: The gracilis tendon (GT) is a commonly used autologous graft in Orthopaedic surgery. The majority of information on knee function and outcomes after hamstring harvest is related to both semitendinosus and GT harvest. Little is known regarding isolated harvest of a GT. It was hypothesized that isolated GT harvest would lead to altered gait patterns (e.g. augmented anterior-posterior translation or rotation in the tibiofemoral joint) and consequently a higher prevalence of cartilage lesions and meniscal tears in knees. METHODS: GT harvesting was performed on patients with chronic acromioclavicular joint instability without previous knee injuries or surgeries. MRI of both knees and thighs were performed. Knee MRI were evaluated using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS). Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities, cross-sectional areas of different muscles, fatty infiltration of the gracilis muscle (GM) and GT regeneration were evaluated. The contralateral limb served as reference. The observers were blinded towards the identity of the patients and the operatively treated side. RESULTS: After a mean time of 44 months after surgery testing was performed on 12 patients. No significant side-to-side differences were found using WORMS, although there was a trend towards increased cartilage lesions after GT harvest (median healthy knee 4.8 and GT harvested knee 7.8 p = 0.086). Inter- and intraobserver repeatability was high with 0.899 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.708–0.960) and 0.988 (95% CI 0.973–0.995), respectively. A significant hypotrophy of the GM with a mean decrease of 25.3%, 18.4% and 16.9% occurred at 25% (p = 0.016), 50% (p = 0.007) and 75% (p = 0.002) of the length of the femur from distal. No compensatory hypertrophy of other thigh muscles or increased fatty infiltration of the GM was found. Tendon regeneration took place in eight out of 12 patients. In case of regeneration, the regenerated tendon inserted in a more proximal place. CONCLUSION: Isolated harvest of the GT for shoulder procedures did not affect knee MRI significantly indicating therefore in general suitable graft utilization for surgeries outside of the knee. GT regenerated in most patients with just a more proximal insertion and a hypotrophy of the muscle belly. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7138873/ /pubmed/32266508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00236-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Flies, Anne
Denecke, Timm
Kraus, Natascha
Kruppa, Philipp
Provencher, Matthew T.
Becker, Roland
Kopf, Sebastian
Tendon regeneration and muscle hypotrophy after isolated Gracilis tendon harvesting - a pilot study
title Tendon regeneration and muscle hypotrophy after isolated Gracilis tendon harvesting - a pilot study
title_full Tendon regeneration and muscle hypotrophy after isolated Gracilis tendon harvesting - a pilot study
title_fullStr Tendon regeneration and muscle hypotrophy after isolated Gracilis tendon harvesting - a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Tendon regeneration and muscle hypotrophy after isolated Gracilis tendon harvesting - a pilot study
title_short Tendon regeneration and muscle hypotrophy after isolated Gracilis tendon harvesting - a pilot study
title_sort tendon regeneration and muscle hypotrophy after isolated gracilis tendon harvesting - a pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7138873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32266508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00236-8
work_keys_str_mv AT fliesanne tendonregenerationandmusclehypotrophyafterisolatedgracilistendonharvestingapilotstudy
AT denecketimm tendonregenerationandmusclehypotrophyafterisolatedgracilistendonharvestingapilotstudy
AT krausnatascha tendonregenerationandmusclehypotrophyafterisolatedgracilistendonharvestingapilotstudy
AT kruppaphilipp tendonregenerationandmusclehypotrophyafterisolatedgracilistendonharvestingapilotstudy
AT provenchermatthewt tendonregenerationandmusclehypotrophyafterisolatedgracilistendonharvestingapilotstudy
AT beckerroland tendonregenerationandmusclehypotrophyafterisolatedgracilistendonharvestingapilotstudy
AT kopfsebastian tendonregenerationandmusclehypotrophyafterisolatedgracilistendonharvestingapilotstudy