Cargando…

Use of Quickfix for tape fixation of chest tubes: a multi-center doctor-nurse questionnaire survey and fixing strength comparison study

BACKGROUND: Several tape fixations for chest tube were proposed, although none have a clear scientific basis. We performed a multicenter survey study to investigate the fixation of chest tubes using an available adhesive tape. We evaluated the strength of tape fixation and the effect of the skin coa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Homma, Takahiro, Ojima, Toshihiro, Shimada, Yoshifumi, Akemoto, Yushi, Yoshimura, Naoki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32274116
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.12.132
_version_ 1783518674458509312
author Homma, Takahiro
Ojima, Toshihiro
Shimada, Yoshifumi
Akemoto, Yushi
Yoshimura, Naoki
author_facet Homma, Takahiro
Ojima, Toshihiro
Shimada, Yoshifumi
Akemoto, Yushi
Yoshimura, Naoki
author_sort Homma, Takahiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several tape fixations for chest tube were proposed, although none have a clear scientific basis. We performed a multicenter survey study to investigate the fixation of chest tubes using an available adhesive tape. We evaluated the strength of tape fixation and the effect of the skin coating material used on the fixation strength. METHODS: A multi-center questionnaire survey was administered in hospitals with a thoracic surgery division. The net promoter score (NPS) was used to measure the medical staff’s satisfaction with an adhesive tape fixation. Fixing strength was calculated as follows: a chest tube was fixed using each taping method to a polyethylene plate and was pulled out in the long axis direction. While pulling out, the maximum resistance force [Newton (N)] and total resistance force [Joule (J)] were measured to calculate the fixing strength. RESULTS: The doctors’ NPS showed no significant difference between handmade tape fixation and Quickfix {7 [5–8] vs. 10 [5–10] points, P=0.34}. The nurses’ NPS showed no significant difference between handmade tape fixation and Quickfix {5 [5–8] vs. 5 [5–7] points, P=0.72}. The average maximum resistance force was the highest for Quickfix (1.36 J, 65.4 N) and a type of handmade fixation (three sheets stuck with foundation tape plus Y-shape slit plus Ω-shape tape; 1.61 J and 54.0 N). The fixation strength of Quickfix did not decrease with a skin coating agent (from 1.24 to 1.11 J and 63.0 to 66.6 N), although that of a handmade tape fixation decreased (from 1.49 to 0.90 J, 52.6 to 38.1 N). CONCLUSIONS: Quickfix provided secure fixation, regardless of the tube size or skin coating. Quickfix may be the best for standardized fixation because it is not only a stronger agent but is safe, simple, inexpensive, reliable, and can be used successfully by anyone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7139028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71390282020-04-09 Use of Quickfix for tape fixation of chest tubes: a multi-center doctor-nurse questionnaire survey and fixing strength comparison study Homma, Takahiro Ojima, Toshihiro Shimada, Yoshifumi Akemoto, Yushi Yoshimura, Naoki J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Several tape fixations for chest tube were proposed, although none have a clear scientific basis. We performed a multicenter survey study to investigate the fixation of chest tubes using an available adhesive tape. We evaluated the strength of tape fixation and the effect of the skin coating material used on the fixation strength. METHODS: A multi-center questionnaire survey was administered in hospitals with a thoracic surgery division. The net promoter score (NPS) was used to measure the medical staff’s satisfaction with an adhesive tape fixation. Fixing strength was calculated as follows: a chest tube was fixed using each taping method to a polyethylene plate and was pulled out in the long axis direction. While pulling out, the maximum resistance force [Newton (N)] and total resistance force [Joule (J)] were measured to calculate the fixing strength. RESULTS: The doctors’ NPS showed no significant difference between handmade tape fixation and Quickfix {7 [5–8] vs. 10 [5–10] points, P=0.34}. The nurses’ NPS showed no significant difference between handmade tape fixation and Quickfix {5 [5–8] vs. 5 [5–7] points, P=0.72}. The average maximum resistance force was the highest for Quickfix (1.36 J, 65.4 N) and a type of handmade fixation (three sheets stuck with foundation tape plus Y-shape slit plus Ω-shape tape; 1.61 J and 54.0 N). The fixation strength of Quickfix did not decrease with a skin coating agent (from 1.24 to 1.11 J and 63.0 to 66.6 N), although that of a handmade tape fixation decreased (from 1.49 to 0.90 J, 52.6 to 38.1 N). CONCLUSIONS: Quickfix provided secure fixation, regardless of the tube size or skin coating. Quickfix may be the best for standardized fixation because it is not only a stronger agent but is safe, simple, inexpensive, reliable, and can be used successfully by anyone. AME Publishing Company 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7139028/ /pubmed/32274116 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.12.132 Text en 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Homma, Takahiro
Ojima, Toshihiro
Shimada, Yoshifumi
Akemoto, Yushi
Yoshimura, Naoki
Use of Quickfix for tape fixation of chest tubes: a multi-center doctor-nurse questionnaire survey and fixing strength comparison study
title Use of Quickfix for tape fixation of chest tubes: a multi-center doctor-nurse questionnaire survey and fixing strength comparison study
title_full Use of Quickfix for tape fixation of chest tubes: a multi-center doctor-nurse questionnaire survey and fixing strength comparison study
title_fullStr Use of Quickfix for tape fixation of chest tubes: a multi-center doctor-nurse questionnaire survey and fixing strength comparison study
title_full_unstemmed Use of Quickfix for tape fixation of chest tubes: a multi-center doctor-nurse questionnaire survey and fixing strength comparison study
title_short Use of Quickfix for tape fixation of chest tubes: a multi-center doctor-nurse questionnaire survey and fixing strength comparison study
title_sort use of quickfix for tape fixation of chest tubes: a multi-center doctor-nurse questionnaire survey and fixing strength comparison study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32274116
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.12.132
work_keys_str_mv AT hommatakahiro useofquickfixfortapefixationofchesttubesamulticenterdoctornursequestionnairesurveyandfixingstrengthcomparisonstudy
AT ojimatoshihiro useofquickfixfortapefixationofchesttubesamulticenterdoctornursequestionnairesurveyandfixingstrengthcomparisonstudy
AT shimadayoshifumi useofquickfixfortapefixationofchesttubesamulticenterdoctornursequestionnairesurveyandfixingstrengthcomparisonstudy
AT akemotoyushi useofquickfixfortapefixationofchesttubesamulticenterdoctornursequestionnairesurveyandfixingstrengthcomparisonstudy
AT yoshimuranaoki useofquickfixfortapefixationofchesttubesamulticenterdoctornursequestionnairesurveyandfixingstrengthcomparisonstudy