Cargando…

Management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up

Anastomotic leak is one of the most feared complications of esophagectomy, leading to prolonged hospital stay, increased postoperative mortality, and additional cost both to the patient and the hospital. Historically, anastomotic leaks have been treated with several techniques including conservative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Famiglietti, Amber, Lazar, John F., Henderson, Hayley, Hamm, Margaret, Malouf, Stefanie, Margolis, Marc, Watson, Thomas J., Khaitan, Puja Gaur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32274171
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.01.15
_version_ 1783518688526204928
author Famiglietti, Amber
Lazar, John F.
Henderson, Hayley
Hamm, Margaret
Malouf, Stefanie
Margolis, Marc
Watson, Thomas J.
Khaitan, Puja Gaur
author_facet Famiglietti, Amber
Lazar, John F.
Henderson, Hayley
Hamm, Margaret
Malouf, Stefanie
Margolis, Marc
Watson, Thomas J.
Khaitan, Puja Gaur
author_sort Famiglietti, Amber
collection PubMed
description Anastomotic leak is one of the most feared complications of esophagectomy, leading to prolonged hospital stay, increased postoperative mortality, and additional cost both to the patient and the hospital. Historically, anastomotic leaks have been treated with several techniques including conservative measures, percutaneous or operative drainage, primary surgical repair with buttressing, T-tube drainage, or excision of the esophageal replacement conduit with end esophagostomy. With advances in treatment modalities, including endoscopic stenting, clips and suturing, endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC), such leaks increasingly are being managed without operative re-intervention and with salvage of the esophageal replacement conduit. For the purposes of this review, we identified studies analyzing the management of postoperative leak after esophagectomy. We then compared the efficacy of the various newer modalities for closure of anastomotic leaks and gastric conduit defects. We found both esophageal stent and EVAC sponges are effective treatments for closure of anastomotic leak. The chosen treatment modality for salvage of the esophageal replacement conduit is entirely dependent on the patient’s clinical status and the surgeon’s preference and experience. Emerging endoscopic and endoluminal therapies have increased the armamentarium of tools the esophageal surgeon has to facilitate successful resolution of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy with reconstruction. While some literature suggests that EVACs have a slightly superior result in conduit success, we question this endorsement as EVACs mostly are utilized for contained leaks, many of which may have healed with conservative measures. This poses a challenge as there is clearly a bias given patient selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7139088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71390882020-04-09 Management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up Famiglietti, Amber Lazar, John F. Henderson, Hayley Hamm, Margaret Malouf, Stefanie Margolis, Marc Watson, Thomas J. Khaitan, Puja Gaur J Thorac Dis Review Article Anastomotic leak is one of the most feared complications of esophagectomy, leading to prolonged hospital stay, increased postoperative mortality, and additional cost both to the patient and the hospital. Historically, anastomotic leaks have been treated with several techniques including conservative measures, percutaneous or operative drainage, primary surgical repair with buttressing, T-tube drainage, or excision of the esophageal replacement conduit with end esophagostomy. With advances in treatment modalities, including endoscopic stenting, clips and suturing, endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure (EVAC), such leaks increasingly are being managed without operative re-intervention and with salvage of the esophageal replacement conduit. For the purposes of this review, we identified studies analyzing the management of postoperative leak after esophagectomy. We then compared the efficacy of the various newer modalities for closure of anastomotic leaks and gastric conduit defects. We found both esophageal stent and EVAC sponges are effective treatments for closure of anastomotic leak. The chosen treatment modality for salvage of the esophageal replacement conduit is entirely dependent on the patient’s clinical status and the surgeon’s preference and experience. Emerging endoscopic and endoluminal therapies have increased the armamentarium of tools the esophageal surgeon has to facilitate successful resolution of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy with reconstruction. While some literature suggests that EVACs have a slightly superior result in conduit success, we question this endorsement as EVACs mostly are utilized for contained leaks, many of which may have healed with conservative measures. This poses a challenge as there is clearly a bias given patient selection. AME Publishing Company 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7139088/ /pubmed/32274171 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.01.15 Text en 2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Famiglietti, Amber
Lazar, John F.
Henderson, Hayley
Hamm, Margaret
Malouf, Stefanie
Margolis, Marc
Watson, Thomas J.
Khaitan, Puja Gaur
Management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
title Management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
title_full Management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
title_fullStr Management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
title_full_unstemmed Management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
title_short Management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
title_sort management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32274171
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2020.01.15
work_keys_str_mv AT famigliettiamber managementofanastomoticleaksafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT lazarjohnf managementofanastomoticleaksafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT hendersonhayley managementofanastomoticleaksafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT hammmargaret managementofanastomoticleaksafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT maloufstefanie managementofanastomoticleaksafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT margolismarc managementofanastomoticleaksafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT watsonthomasj managementofanastomoticleaksafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup
AT khaitanpujagaur managementofanastomoticleaksafteresophagectomyandgastricpullup