Cargando…
Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion
OBJECTIVE: An expert panel convened to reach a consensus on common misconceptions surrounding buprenorphine, a Schedule III partial µ-opioid receptor agonist indicated for chronic pain. The panel also provided clinical recommendations on the appropriate use of buprenorphine and conversion strategies...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31917418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz356 |
_version_ | 1783518713977241600 |
---|---|
author | Webster, Lynn Gudin, Jeffrey Raffa, Robert B Kuchera, Jay Rauck, Richard Fudin, Jeffrey Adler, Jeremy Mallick-Searle, Theresa |
author_facet | Webster, Lynn Gudin, Jeffrey Raffa, Robert B Kuchera, Jay Rauck, Richard Fudin, Jeffrey Adler, Jeremy Mallick-Searle, Theresa |
author_sort | Webster, Lynn |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: An expert panel convened to reach a consensus on common misconceptions surrounding buprenorphine, a Schedule III partial µ-opioid receptor agonist indicated for chronic pain. The panel also provided clinical recommendations on the appropriate use of buprenorphine and conversion strategies for switching to buprenorphine from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist for chronic pain management. METHODS: The consensus panel met on March 25, 2019, to discuss relevant literature and provide recommendations on interpreting buprenorphine as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist, prescribing buprenorphine before some Schedule II, III, or IV options, perioperative/trauma management of patients taking buprenorphine, and converting patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine. RESULTS: The panel recommended that buprenorphine’s classification as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist not be clinically translated to mean partial analgesic efficacy. The panel also recommended that buprenorphine be considered before some Schedule II, III, or IV opioids in patients with a favorable risk/benefit profile on the basis of metabolic factors, abuse potential, and tolerability and that buprenorphine be continued during the perioperative/trauma period. In addition, switching patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine should be considered with no weaning period at starting doses that are based on the previous opioid dose. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations provide a framework for clinicians to address most clinical scenarios regarding buprenorphine use. The overall consensus of the panel was that buprenorphine is a unique Schedule III opioid with favorable pharmacologic properties and a safety profile that may be desirable for chronic pain management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7139205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71392052020-04-13 Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion Webster, Lynn Gudin, Jeffrey Raffa, Robert B Kuchera, Jay Rauck, Richard Fudin, Jeffrey Adler, Jeremy Mallick-Searle, Theresa Pain Med OPIOIDS & SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS SECTION OBJECTIVE: An expert panel convened to reach a consensus on common misconceptions surrounding buprenorphine, a Schedule III partial µ-opioid receptor agonist indicated for chronic pain. The panel also provided clinical recommendations on the appropriate use of buprenorphine and conversion strategies for switching to buprenorphine from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist for chronic pain management. METHODS: The consensus panel met on March 25, 2019, to discuss relevant literature and provide recommendations on interpreting buprenorphine as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist, prescribing buprenorphine before some Schedule II, III, or IV options, perioperative/trauma management of patients taking buprenorphine, and converting patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine. RESULTS: The panel recommended that buprenorphine’s classification as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist not be clinically translated to mean partial analgesic efficacy. The panel also recommended that buprenorphine be considered before some Schedule II, III, or IV opioids in patients with a favorable risk/benefit profile on the basis of metabolic factors, abuse potential, and tolerability and that buprenorphine be continued during the perioperative/trauma period. In addition, switching patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine should be considered with no weaning period at starting doses that are based on the previous opioid dose. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations provide a framework for clinicians to address most clinical scenarios regarding buprenorphine use. The overall consensus of the panel was that buprenorphine is a unique Schedule III opioid with favorable pharmacologic properties and a safety profile that may be desirable for chronic pain management. Oxford University Press 2020-04 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7139205/ /pubmed/31917418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz356 Text en © 2020 American Academy of Pain Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contactjournals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | OPIOIDS & SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS SECTION Webster, Lynn Gudin, Jeffrey Raffa, Robert B Kuchera, Jay Rauck, Richard Fudin, Jeffrey Adler, Jeremy Mallick-Searle, Theresa Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion |
title | Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion |
title_full | Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion |
title_fullStr | Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion |
title_short | Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion |
title_sort | understanding buprenorphine for use in chronic pain: expert opinion |
topic | OPIOIDS & SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS SECTION |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31917418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz356 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT websterlynn understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion AT gudinjeffrey understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion AT raffarobertb understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion AT kucherajay understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion AT rauckrichard understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion AT fudinjeffrey understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion AT adlerjeremy understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion AT mallicksearletheresa understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion |