Cargando…

Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion

OBJECTIVE: An expert panel convened to reach a consensus on common misconceptions surrounding buprenorphine, a Schedule III partial µ-opioid receptor agonist indicated for chronic pain. The panel also provided clinical recommendations on the appropriate use of buprenorphine and conversion strategies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webster, Lynn, Gudin, Jeffrey, Raffa, Robert B, Kuchera, Jay, Rauck, Richard, Fudin, Jeffrey, Adler, Jeremy, Mallick-Searle, Theresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31917418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz356
_version_ 1783518713977241600
author Webster, Lynn
Gudin, Jeffrey
Raffa, Robert B
Kuchera, Jay
Rauck, Richard
Fudin, Jeffrey
Adler, Jeremy
Mallick-Searle, Theresa
author_facet Webster, Lynn
Gudin, Jeffrey
Raffa, Robert B
Kuchera, Jay
Rauck, Richard
Fudin, Jeffrey
Adler, Jeremy
Mallick-Searle, Theresa
author_sort Webster, Lynn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: An expert panel convened to reach a consensus on common misconceptions surrounding buprenorphine, a Schedule III partial µ-opioid receptor agonist indicated for chronic pain. The panel also provided clinical recommendations on the appropriate use of buprenorphine and conversion strategies for switching to buprenorphine from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist for chronic pain management. METHODS: The consensus panel met on March 25, 2019, to discuss relevant literature and provide recommendations on interpreting buprenorphine as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist, prescribing buprenorphine before some Schedule II, III, or IV options, perioperative/trauma management of patients taking buprenorphine, and converting patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine. RESULTS: The panel recommended that buprenorphine’s classification as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist not be clinically translated to mean partial analgesic efficacy. The panel also recommended that buprenorphine be considered before some Schedule II, III, or IV opioids in patients with a favorable risk/benefit profile on the basis of metabolic factors, abuse potential, and tolerability and that buprenorphine be continued during the perioperative/trauma period. In addition, switching patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine should be considered with no weaning period at starting doses that are based on the previous opioid dose. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations provide a framework for clinicians to address most clinical scenarios regarding buprenorphine use. The overall consensus of the panel was that buprenorphine is a unique Schedule III opioid with favorable pharmacologic properties and a safety profile that may be desirable for chronic pain management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7139205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71392052020-04-13 Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion Webster, Lynn Gudin, Jeffrey Raffa, Robert B Kuchera, Jay Rauck, Richard Fudin, Jeffrey Adler, Jeremy Mallick-Searle, Theresa Pain Med OPIOIDS & SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS SECTION OBJECTIVE: An expert panel convened to reach a consensus on common misconceptions surrounding buprenorphine, a Schedule III partial µ-opioid receptor agonist indicated for chronic pain. The panel also provided clinical recommendations on the appropriate use of buprenorphine and conversion strategies for switching to buprenorphine from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist for chronic pain management. METHODS: The consensus panel met on March 25, 2019, to discuss relevant literature and provide recommendations on interpreting buprenorphine as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist, prescribing buprenorphine before some Schedule II, III, or IV options, perioperative/trauma management of patients taking buprenorphine, and converting patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine. RESULTS: The panel recommended that buprenorphine’s classification as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist not be clinically translated to mean partial analgesic efficacy. The panel also recommended that buprenorphine be considered before some Schedule II, III, or IV opioids in patients with a favorable risk/benefit profile on the basis of metabolic factors, abuse potential, and tolerability and that buprenorphine be continued during the perioperative/trauma period. In addition, switching patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine should be considered with no weaning period at starting doses that are based on the previous opioid dose. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations provide a framework for clinicians to address most clinical scenarios regarding buprenorphine use. The overall consensus of the panel was that buprenorphine is a unique Schedule III opioid with favorable pharmacologic properties and a safety profile that may be desirable for chronic pain management. Oxford University Press 2020-04 2020-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7139205/ /pubmed/31917418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz356 Text en © 2020 American Academy of Pain Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contactjournals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle OPIOIDS & SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS SECTION
Webster, Lynn
Gudin, Jeffrey
Raffa, Robert B
Kuchera, Jay
Rauck, Richard
Fudin, Jeffrey
Adler, Jeremy
Mallick-Searle, Theresa
Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion
title Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion
title_full Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion
title_fullStr Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion
title_short Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion
title_sort understanding buprenorphine for use in chronic pain: expert opinion
topic OPIOIDS & SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS SECTION
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31917418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnz356
work_keys_str_mv AT websterlynn understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion
AT gudinjeffrey understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion
AT raffarobertb understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion
AT kucherajay understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion
AT rauckrichard understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion
AT fudinjeffrey understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion
AT adlerjeremy understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion
AT mallicksearletheresa understandingbuprenorphineforuseinchronicpainexpertopinion