Cargando…
The Current Status of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Neuro-Oncology: A Systematic Review
The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), as a novel treatment modality, has transformed the field of oncology with unprecedented successes. However, the efficacy of ICI for patients with glioblastoma or brain metastases (BMs) from any tumor type is under debate. Therefore, we systemat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32143288 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030586 |
_version_ | 1783518812071526400 |
---|---|
author | Brahm, Cyrillo G. van Linde, Myra E. Enting, Roelien H. Schuur, Maaike Otten, René H.J. Heymans, Martijn W. Verheul, Henk M.W. Walenkamp, Annemiek M.E. |
author_facet | Brahm, Cyrillo G. van Linde, Myra E. Enting, Roelien H. Schuur, Maaike Otten, René H.J. Heymans, Martijn W. Verheul, Henk M.W. Walenkamp, Annemiek M.E. |
author_sort | Brahm, Cyrillo G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), as a novel treatment modality, has transformed the field of oncology with unprecedented successes. However, the efficacy of ICI for patients with glioblastoma or brain metastases (BMs) from any tumor type is under debate. Therefore, we systematically reviewed current literature on the use of ICI in patients with glioblastoma and BMs. Prospective and retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy and survival outcomes of ICI in patients with glioblastoma or BMs, and published between 2006 and November 2019, were considered. A total of 88 studies were identified (n = 8 in glioblastoma and n = 80 in BMs). In glioblastoma, median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all studies were 2.1 and 7.3 months, respectively. In patients with BMs, intracranial responses have been reported in studies with melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The median intracranial and total PFS in these studies were 2.7 and 3.0 months, respectively. The median OS in all studies for patients with brain BMs was 8.0 months. To date, ICI demonstrate limited efficacy in patients with glioblastoma or BMs. Future research should focus on increasing the local and systemic immunological responses in these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7139638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71396382020-04-10 The Current Status of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Neuro-Oncology: A Systematic Review Brahm, Cyrillo G. van Linde, Myra E. Enting, Roelien H. Schuur, Maaike Otten, René H.J. Heymans, Martijn W. Verheul, Henk M.W. Walenkamp, Annemiek M.E. Cancers (Basel) Review The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), as a novel treatment modality, has transformed the field of oncology with unprecedented successes. However, the efficacy of ICI for patients with glioblastoma or brain metastases (BMs) from any tumor type is under debate. Therefore, we systematically reviewed current literature on the use of ICI in patients with glioblastoma and BMs. Prospective and retrospective studies evaluating the efficacy and survival outcomes of ICI in patients with glioblastoma or BMs, and published between 2006 and November 2019, were considered. A total of 88 studies were identified (n = 8 in glioblastoma and n = 80 in BMs). In glioblastoma, median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all studies were 2.1 and 7.3 months, respectively. In patients with BMs, intracranial responses have been reported in studies with melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The median intracranial and total PFS in these studies were 2.7 and 3.0 months, respectively. The median OS in all studies for patients with brain BMs was 8.0 months. To date, ICI demonstrate limited efficacy in patients with glioblastoma or BMs. Future research should focus on increasing the local and systemic immunological responses in these patients. MDPI 2020-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7139638/ /pubmed/32143288 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030586 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Brahm, Cyrillo G. van Linde, Myra E. Enting, Roelien H. Schuur, Maaike Otten, René H.J. Heymans, Martijn W. Verheul, Henk M.W. Walenkamp, Annemiek M.E. The Current Status of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Neuro-Oncology: A Systematic Review |
title | The Current Status of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Neuro-Oncology: A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Current Status of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Neuro-Oncology: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Current Status of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Neuro-Oncology: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Current Status of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Neuro-Oncology: A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Current Status of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Neuro-Oncology: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | current status of immune checkpoint inhibitors in neuro-oncology: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32143288 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030586 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brahmcyrillog thecurrentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT vanlindemyrae thecurrentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT entingroelienh thecurrentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT schuurmaaike thecurrentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT ottenrenehj thecurrentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT heymansmartijnw thecurrentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT verheulhenkmw thecurrentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT walenkampannemiekme thecurrentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT brahmcyrillog currentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT vanlindemyrae currentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT entingroelienh currentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT schuurmaaike currentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT ottenrenehj currentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT heymansmartijnw currentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT verheulhenkmw currentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview AT walenkampannemiekme currentstatusofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinneurooncologyasystematicreview |