Cargando…

Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma

Background: The tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) classification system to categorized anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) was revised. Methods: The revised system was evaluated using a large database of ATC patients. Results: A total of 757 patients were analyzed. The proportion and median overall survival v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onoda, Naoyoshi, Sugitani, Iwao, Ito, Ken-ichi, Suzuki, Akifumi, Higashiyama, Takuya, Fukumori, Tatsuya, Suganuma, Nobuyasu, Masudo, Katsuhiko, Nakayama, Hirotaka, Uno, Atsuhiko, Yane, Katsunari, Yoshimoto, Seiichi, Ebina, Aya, Kawasaki, Yukari, Maeda, Shigeto, Iwadate, Manabu, Suzuki, Shinichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32120853
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030552
_version_ 1783518866283954176
author Onoda, Naoyoshi
Sugitani, Iwao
Ito, Ken-ichi
Suzuki, Akifumi
Higashiyama, Takuya
Fukumori, Tatsuya
Suganuma, Nobuyasu
Masudo, Katsuhiko
Nakayama, Hirotaka
Uno, Atsuhiko
Yane, Katsunari
Yoshimoto, Seiichi
Ebina, Aya
Kawasaki, Yukari
Maeda, Shigeto
Iwadate, Manabu
Suzuki, Shinichi
author_facet Onoda, Naoyoshi
Sugitani, Iwao
Ito, Ken-ichi
Suzuki, Akifumi
Higashiyama, Takuya
Fukumori, Tatsuya
Suganuma, Nobuyasu
Masudo, Katsuhiko
Nakayama, Hirotaka
Uno, Atsuhiko
Yane, Katsunari
Yoshimoto, Seiichi
Ebina, Aya
Kawasaki, Yukari
Maeda, Shigeto
Iwadate, Manabu
Suzuki, Shinichi
author_sort Onoda, Naoyoshi
collection PubMed
description Background: The tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) classification system to categorized anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) was revised. Methods: The revised system was evaluated using a large database of ATC patients. Results: A total of 757 patients were analyzed. The proportion and median overall survival values (OS: months) for each T category were T1 (n = 8, 1.1%, 12.5), T2 (n = 43, 5.7%, 10.9), T3a (n = 117, 15.5%, 5.7), T3b (n = 438, 57.9%, 3.9), and T4 (n = 151, 19.9%, 5.0). The OS of the N0 and N1 patients were 5.9 and 4.3, respectively (log-rank p < 0.01). Sixty-three (58.3%) patients migrated from stage IV A to IV B by revision based on the existence of nodal involvement and 422 patients (55.7%) were stratified into stage IV B, without a worsening of their OS (6.1), leaving 45 patients (5.9%) in stage IV A with fair OS (15.8). The hazard ratios for the survival of the patients of stage IV B compared to stage IV A increased from 1.1 to 2.1 by the revision. No change was made for stage IV C (n = 290, 38.8%, 2.8). Conclusion: The revised TNM system clearly indicated the prognoses of ATC patients by extracting rare patients with fair prognoses as having stage IV A disease and categorized many heterogeneous patients in stage IV B.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7139873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71398732020-04-13 Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma Onoda, Naoyoshi Sugitani, Iwao Ito, Ken-ichi Suzuki, Akifumi Higashiyama, Takuya Fukumori, Tatsuya Suganuma, Nobuyasu Masudo, Katsuhiko Nakayama, Hirotaka Uno, Atsuhiko Yane, Katsunari Yoshimoto, Seiichi Ebina, Aya Kawasaki, Yukari Maeda, Shigeto Iwadate, Manabu Suzuki, Shinichi Cancers (Basel) Article Background: The tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) classification system to categorized anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) was revised. Methods: The revised system was evaluated using a large database of ATC patients. Results: A total of 757 patients were analyzed. The proportion and median overall survival values (OS: months) for each T category were T1 (n = 8, 1.1%, 12.5), T2 (n = 43, 5.7%, 10.9), T3a (n = 117, 15.5%, 5.7), T3b (n = 438, 57.9%, 3.9), and T4 (n = 151, 19.9%, 5.0). The OS of the N0 and N1 patients were 5.9 and 4.3, respectively (log-rank p < 0.01). Sixty-three (58.3%) patients migrated from stage IV A to IV B by revision based on the existence of nodal involvement and 422 patients (55.7%) were stratified into stage IV B, without a worsening of their OS (6.1), leaving 45 patients (5.9%) in stage IV A with fair OS (15.8). The hazard ratios for the survival of the patients of stage IV B compared to stage IV A increased from 1.1 to 2.1 by the revision. No change was made for stage IV C (n = 290, 38.8%, 2.8). Conclusion: The revised TNM system clearly indicated the prognoses of ATC patients by extracting rare patients with fair prognoses as having stage IV A disease and categorized many heterogeneous patients in stage IV B. MDPI 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7139873/ /pubmed/32120853 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030552 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Onoda, Naoyoshi
Sugitani, Iwao
Ito, Ken-ichi
Suzuki, Akifumi
Higashiyama, Takuya
Fukumori, Tatsuya
Suganuma, Nobuyasu
Masudo, Katsuhiko
Nakayama, Hirotaka
Uno, Atsuhiko
Yane, Katsunari
Yoshimoto, Seiichi
Ebina, Aya
Kawasaki, Yukari
Maeda, Shigeto
Iwadate, Manabu
Suzuki, Shinichi
Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma
title Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma
title_full Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma
title_fullStr Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma
title_short Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma
title_sort evaluation of the 8th edition tnm classification for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32120853
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030552
work_keys_str_mv AT onodanaoyoshi evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT sugitaniiwao evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT itokenichi evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT suzukiakifumi evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT higashiyamatakuya evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT fukumoritatsuya evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT suganumanobuyasu evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT masudokatsuhiko evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT nakayamahirotaka evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT unoatsuhiko evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT yanekatsunari evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT yoshimotoseiichi evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT ebinaaya evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT kawasakiyukari evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT maedashigeto evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT iwadatemanabu evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma
AT suzukishinichi evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma