Cargando…
Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma
Background: The tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) classification system to categorized anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) was revised. Methods: The revised system was evaluated using a large database of ATC patients. Results: A total of 757 patients were analyzed. The proportion and median overall survival v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32120853 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030552 |
_version_ | 1783518866283954176 |
---|---|
author | Onoda, Naoyoshi Sugitani, Iwao Ito, Ken-ichi Suzuki, Akifumi Higashiyama, Takuya Fukumori, Tatsuya Suganuma, Nobuyasu Masudo, Katsuhiko Nakayama, Hirotaka Uno, Atsuhiko Yane, Katsunari Yoshimoto, Seiichi Ebina, Aya Kawasaki, Yukari Maeda, Shigeto Iwadate, Manabu Suzuki, Shinichi |
author_facet | Onoda, Naoyoshi Sugitani, Iwao Ito, Ken-ichi Suzuki, Akifumi Higashiyama, Takuya Fukumori, Tatsuya Suganuma, Nobuyasu Masudo, Katsuhiko Nakayama, Hirotaka Uno, Atsuhiko Yane, Katsunari Yoshimoto, Seiichi Ebina, Aya Kawasaki, Yukari Maeda, Shigeto Iwadate, Manabu Suzuki, Shinichi |
author_sort | Onoda, Naoyoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) classification system to categorized anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) was revised. Methods: The revised system was evaluated using a large database of ATC patients. Results: A total of 757 patients were analyzed. The proportion and median overall survival values (OS: months) for each T category were T1 (n = 8, 1.1%, 12.5), T2 (n = 43, 5.7%, 10.9), T3a (n = 117, 15.5%, 5.7), T3b (n = 438, 57.9%, 3.9), and T4 (n = 151, 19.9%, 5.0). The OS of the N0 and N1 patients were 5.9 and 4.3, respectively (log-rank p < 0.01). Sixty-three (58.3%) patients migrated from stage IV A to IV B by revision based on the existence of nodal involvement and 422 patients (55.7%) were stratified into stage IV B, without a worsening of their OS (6.1), leaving 45 patients (5.9%) in stage IV A with fair OS (15.8). The hazard ratios for the survival of the patients of stage IV B compared to stage IV A increased from 1.1 to 2.1 by the revision. No change was made for stage IV C (n = 290, 38.8%, 2.8). Conclusion: The revised TNM system clearly indicated the prognoses of ATC patients by extracting rare patients with fair prognoses as having stage IV A disease and categorized many heterogeneous patients in stage IV B. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7139873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71398732020-04-13 Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma Onoda, Naoyoshi Sugitani, Iwao Ito, Ken-ichi Suzuki, Akifumi Higashiyama, Takuya Fukumori, Tatsuya Suganuma, Nobuyasu Masudo, Katsuhiko Nakayama, Hirotaka Uno, Atsuhiko Yane, Katsunari Yoshimoto, Seiichi Ebina, Aya Kawasaki, Yukari Maeda, Shigeto Iwadate, Manabu Suzuki, Shinichi Cancers (Basel) Article Background: The tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) classification system to categorized anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) was revised. Methods: The revised system was evaluated using a large database of ATC patients. Results: A total of 757 patients were analyzed. The proportion and median overall survival values (OS: months) for each T category were T1 (n = 8, 1.1%, 12.5), T2 (n = 43, 5.7%, 10.9), T3a (n = 117, 15.5%, 5.7), T3b (n = 438, 57.9%, 3.9), and T4 (n = 151, 19.9%, 5.0). The OS of the N0 and N1 patients were 5.9 and 4.3, respectively (log-rank p < 0.01). Sixty-three (58.3%) patients migrated from stage IV A to IV B by revision based on the existence of nodal involvement and 422 patients (55.7%) were stratified into stage IV B, without a worsening of their OS (6.1), leaving 45 patients (5.9%) in stage IV A with fair OS (15.8). The hazard ratios for the survival of the patients of stage IV B compared to stage IV A increased from 1.1 to 2.1 by the revision. No change was made for stage IV C (n = 290, 38.8%, 2.8). Conclusion: The revised TNM system clearly indicated the prognoses of ATC patients by extracting rare patients with fair prognoses as having stage IV A disease and categorized many heterogeneous patients in stage IV B. MDPI 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7139873/ /pubmed/32120853 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030552 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Onoda, Naoyoshi Sugitani, Iwao Ito, Ken-ichi Suzuki, Akifumi Higashiyama, Takuya Fukumori, Tatsuya Suganuma, Nobuyasu Masudo, Katsuhiko Nakayama, Hirotaka Uno, Atsuhiko Yane, Katsunari Yoshimoto, Seiichi Ebina, Aya Kawasaki, Yukari Maeda, Shigeto Iwadate, Manabu Suzuki, Shinichi Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma |
title | Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma |
title_full | Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma |
title_short | Evaluation of the 8th Edition TNM Classification for Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma |
title_sort | evaluation of the 8th edition tnm classification for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32120853 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12030552 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT onodanaoyoshi evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT sugitaniiwao evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT itokenichi evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT suzukiakifumi evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT higashiyamatakuya evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT fukumoritatsuya evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT suganumanobuyasu evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT masudokatsuhiko evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT nakayamahirotaka evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT unoatsuhiko evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT yanekatsunari evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT yoshimotoseiichi evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT ebinaaya evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT kawasakiyukari evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT maedashigeto evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT iwadatemanabu evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma AT suzukishinichi evaluationofthe8theditiontnmclassificationforanaplasticthyroidcarcinoma |