Cargando…

A Simple Pattern of Movement Is Not Able to Inhibit Experimental Pain in FM Patients and Controls: An sLORETA Study

Motor cortex activation seems to induce an analgesic effect on pain that would be different between patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and control subjects. This study was conducted to analyze the changes of the laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) induced during a finger tapping task in the FM patients and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gentile, Eleonora, Ricci, Katia, Vecchio, Eleonora, Libro, Giuseppe, Delussi, Marianna, Casas-Barragàn, Antonio, de Tommaso, Marina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214053
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10030190
_version_ 1783518875680243712
author Gentile, Eleonora
Ricci, Katia
Vecchio, Eleonora
Libro, Giuseppe
Delussi, Marianna
Casas-Barragàn, Antonio
de Tommaso, Marina
author_facet Gentile, Eleonora
Ricci, Katia
Vecchio, Eleonora
Libro, Giuseppe
Delussi, Marianna
Casas-Barragàn, Antonio
de Tommaso, Marina
author_sort Gentile, Eleonora
collection PubMed
description Motor cortex activation seems to induce an analgesic effect on pain that would be different between patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and control subjects. This study was conducted to analyze the changes of the laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) induced during a finger tapping task in the FM patients and the controls employing a multi-dipolar analysis according to Standardized low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) method. The LEPs from 38 FM patients and 21 controls were analyzed. The LEPs were recorded while subjects performed a slow and a fast finger tapping task. We confirmed that the difference between N1, N2 and P2 wave amplitudes between conditions and groups was not significant. In control subjects, the fast finger tapping task induced a modification of cortical source activation in the main areas processing laser stimulation from the moving hand independently from the movement speed. In summary, a simple and repetitive movement is not able to induce consistent inhibition of experimental pain evoked by the moving and the not moving hand in each group. It could interfere with LEP sources within the limbic area at least in control subjects, without inhibit cortical responses or explain the different pattern of motor and pain interaction in FM patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7139913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71399132020-04-13 A Simple Pattern of Movement Is Not Able to Inhibit Experimental Pain in FM Patients and Controls: An sLORETA Study Gentile, Eleonora Ricci, Katia Vecchio, Eleonora Libro, Giuseppe Delussi, Marianna Casas-Barragàn, Antonio de Tommaso, Marina Brain Sci Article Motor cortex activation seems to induce an analgesic effect on pain that would be different between patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and control subjects. This study was conducted to analyze the changes of the laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) induced during a finger tapping task in the FM patients and the controls employing a multi-dipolar analysis according to Standardized low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) method. The LEPs from 38 FM patients and 21 controls were analyzed. The LEPs were recorded while subjects performed a slow and a fast finger tapping task. We confirmed that the difference between N1, N2 and P2 wave amplitudes between conditions and groups was not significant. In control subjects, the fast finger tapping task induced a modification of cortical source activation in the main areas processing laser stimulation from the moving hand independently from the movement speed. In summary, a simple and repetitive movement is not able to induce consistent inhibition of experimental pain evoked by the moving and the not moving hand in each group. It could interfere with LEP sources within the limbic area at least in control subjects, without inhibit cortical responses or explain the different pattern of motor and pain interaction in FM patients. MDPI 2020-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7139913/ /pubmed/32214053 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10030190 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gentile, Eleonora
Ricci, Katia
Vecchio, Eleonora
Libro, Giuseppe
Delussi, Marianna
Casas-Barragàn, Antonio
de Tommaso, Marina
A Simple Pattern of Movement Is Not Able to Inhibit Experimental Pain in FM Patients and Controls: An sLORETA Study
title A Simple Pattern of Movement Is Not Able to Inhibit Experimental Pain in FM Patients and Controls: An sLORETA Study
title_full A Simple Pattern of Movement Is Not Able to Inhibit Experimental Pain in FM Patients and Controls: An sLORETA Study
title_fullStr A Simple Pattern of Movement Is Not Able to Inhibit Experimental Pain in FM Patients and Controls: An sLORETA Study
title_full_unstemmed A Simple Pattern of Movement Is Not Able to Inhibit Experimental Pain in FM Patients and Controls: An sLORETA Study
title_short A Simple Pattern of Movement Is Not Able to Inhibit Experimental Pain in FM Patients and Controls: An sLORETA Study
title_sort simple pattern of movement is not able to inhibit experimental pain in fm patients and controls: an sloreta study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7139913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32214053
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10030190
work_keys_str_mv AT gentileeleonora asimplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy
AT riccikatia asimplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy
AT vecchioeleonora asimplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy
AT librogiuseppe asimplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy
AT delussimarianna asimplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy
AT casasbarraganantonio asimplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy
AT detommasomarina asimplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy
AT gentileeleonora simplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy
AT riccikatia simplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy
AT vecchioeleonora simplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy
AT librogiuseppe simplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy
AT delussimarianna simplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy
AT casasbarraganantonio simplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy
AT detommasomarina simplepatternofmovementisnotabletoinhibitexperimentalpaininfmpatientsandcontrolsansloretastudy