Cargando…

Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively evaluate the implementation of Capacity Coaching, an intervention to address the work patients must undertake to manage their conditions, implemented as a quality improvement pilot in 1 of 2 implementing US Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. PARTICIPANTS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boehmer, Kasey R., Thota, Anjali, Organick, Paige, Havens, Kathryn, Shah, Nilay D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.11.002
_version_ 1783518899547930624
author Boehmer, Kasey R.
Thota, Anjali
Organick, Paige
Havens, Kathryn
Shah, Nilay D.
author_facet Boehmer, Kasey R.
Thota, Anjali
Organick, Paige
Havens, Kathryn
Shah, Nilay D.
author_sort Boehmer, Kasey R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively evaluate the implementation of Capacity Coaching, an intervention to address the work patients must undertake to manage their conditions, implemented as a quality improvement pilot in 1 of 2 implementing US Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Two Veterans Affairs medical centers in the Midwest sought to implement Capacity Coaching as a quality improvement pilot in their Patient-Aligned Care Teams for 6 months (April 1, 2017, through October 31, 2017). Following the pilot, we conducted a focused ethnographic evaluation (on-site data collection, January 2-4, 2018), including interviews, a focus group, and observations with staff at one site to assess the implementation of capacity coaching. Data were analyzed inductively and findings were cross-referenced with implementation theory. RESULTS: We found that implementation was feasible and achieved changes that were aligned with reducing patient work and increasing capacity. We found that the key facilitators for the implementation of this program were in participants making sense of the intervention (coherence) and working collectively to enact the program (collective action). The main challenges for the program were in planning the work of implementation and enrolling a diverse coalition of staff to expand referrals to the program (cognitive participation) and in evaluating the impact of the program on outcomes that upper leadership was interested in (reflexive monitoring). CONCLUSION: Implementation of Capacity Coaching is feasible in clinical practice and may be a promising intervention for the care of chronic conditions. Further research should focus on testing capacity coaching using these lessons learned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7140014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71400142020-04-10 Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice Boehmer, Kasey R. Thota, Anjali Organick, Paige Havens, Kathryn Shah, Nilay D. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Original Article OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively evaluate the implementation of Capacity Coaching, an intervention to address the work patients must undertake to manage their conditions, implemented as a quality improvement pilot in 1 of 2 implementing US Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Two Veterans Affairs medical centers in the Midwest sought to implement Capacity Coaching as a quality improvement pilot in their Patient-Aligned Care Teams for 6 months (April 1, 2017, through October 31, 2017). Following the pilot, we conducted a focused ethnographic evaluation (on-site data collection, January 2-4, 2018), including interviews, a focus group, and observations with staff at one site to assess the implementation of capacity coaching. Data were analyzed inductively and findings were cross-referenced with implementation theory. RESULTS: We found that implementation was feasible and achieved changes that were aligned with reducing patient work and increasing capacity. We found that the key facilitators for the implementation of this program were in participants making sense of the intervention (coherence) and working collectively to enact the program (collective action). The main challenges for the program were in planning the work of implementation and enrolling a diverse coalition of staff to expand referrals to the program (cognitive participation) and in evaluating the impact of the program on outcomes that upper leadership was interested in (reflexive monitoring). CONCLUSION: Implementation of Capacity Coaching is feasible in clinical practice and may be a promising intervention for the care of chronic conditions. Further research should focus on testing capacity coaching using these lessons learned. Elsevier 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7140014/ /pubmed/32280930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.11.002 Text en © 2019 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Boehmer, Kasey R.
Thota, Anjali
Organick, Paige
Havens, Kathryn
Shah, Nilay D.
Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice
title Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice
title_full Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice
title_short Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice
title_sort capacity coaching: a focused ethnographic evaluation in clinical practice
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.11.002
work_keys_str_mv AT boehmerkaseyr capacitycoachingafocusedethnographicevaluationinclinicalpractice
AT thotaanjali capacitycoachingafocusedethnographicevaluationinclinicalpractice
AT organickpaige capacitycoachingafocusedethnographicevaluationinclinicalpractice
AT havenskathryn capacitycoachingafocusedethnographicevaluationinclinicalpractice
AT shahnilayd capacitycoachingafocusedethnographicevaluationinclinicalpractice