Cargando…
Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice
OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively evaluate the implementation of Capacity Coaching, an intervention to address the work patients must undertake to manage their conditions, implemented as a quality improvement pilot in 1 of 2 implementing US Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. PARTICIPANTS AND...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.11.002 |
_version_ | 1783518899547930624 |
---|---|
author | Boehmer, Kasey R. Thota, Anjali Organick, Paige Havens, Kathryn Shah, Nilay D. |
author_facet | Boehmer, Kasey R. Thota, Anjali Organick, Paige Havens, Kathryn Shah, Nilay D. |
author_sort | Boehmer, Kasey R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively evaluate the implementation of Capacity Coaching, an intervention to address the work patients must undertake to manage their conditions, implemented as a quality improvement pilot in 1 of 2 implementing US Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Two Veterans Affairs medical centers in the Midwest sought to implement Capacity Coaching as a quality improvement pilot in their Patient-Aligned Care Teams for 6 months (April 1, 2017, through October 31, 2017). Following the pilot, we conducted a focused ethnographic evaluation (on-site data collection, January 2-4, 2018), including interviews, a focus group, and observations with staff at one site to assess the implementation of capacity coaching. Data were analyzed inductively and findings were cross-referenced with implementation theory. RESULTS: We found that implementation was feasible and achieved changes that were aligned with reducing patient work and increasing capacity. We found that the key facilitators for the implementation of this program were in participants making sense of the intervention (coherence) and working collectively to enact the program (collective action). The main challenges for the program were in planning the work of implementation and enrolling a diverse coalition of staff to expand referrals to the program (cognitive participation) and in evaluating the impact of the program on outcomes that upper leadership was interested in (reflexive monitoring). CONCLUSION: Implementation of Capacity Coaching is feasible in clinical practice and may be a promising intervention for the care of chronic conditions. Further research should focus on testing capacity coaching using these lessons learned. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7140014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71400142020-04-10 Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice Boehmer, Kasey R. Thota, Anjali Organick, Paige Havens, Kathryn Shah, Nilay D. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Original Article OBJECTIVE: To qualitatively evaluate the implementation of Capacity Coaching, an intervention to address the work patients must undertake to manage their conditions, implemented as a quality improvement pilot in 1 of 2 implementing US Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Two Veterans Affairs medical centers in the Midwest sought to implement Capacity Coaching as a quality improvement pilot in their Patient-Aligned Care Teams for 6 months (April 1, 2017, through October 31, 2017). Following the pilot, we conducted a focused ethnographic evaluation (on-site data collection, January 2-4, 2018), including interviews, a focus group, and observations with staff at one site to assess the implementation of capacity coaching. Data were analyzed inductively and findings were cross-referenced with implementation theory. RESULTS: We found that implementation was feasible and achieved changes that were aligned with reducing patient work and increasing capacity. We found that the key facilitators for the implementation of this program were in participants making sense of the intervention (coherence) and working collectively to enact the program (collective action). The main challenges for the program were in planning the work of implementation and enrolling a diverse coalition of staff to expand referrals to the program (cognitive participation) and in evaluating the impact of the program on outcomes that upper leadership was interested in (reflexive monitoring). CONCLUSION: Implementation of Capacity Coaching is feasible in clinical practice and may be a promising intervention for the care of chronic conditions. Further research should focus on testing capacity coaching using these lessons learned. Elsevier 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7140014/ /pubmed/32280930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.11.002 Text en © 2019 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Boehmer, Kasey R. Thota, Anjali Organick, Paige Havens, Kathryn Shah, Nilay D. Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice |
title | Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice |
title_full | Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice |
title_fullStr | Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice |
title_short | Capacity Coaching: A Focused Ethnographic Evaluation in Clinical Practice |
title_sort | capacity coaching: a focused ethnographic evaluation in clinical practice |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.11.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boehmerkaseyr capacitycoachingafocusedethnographicevaluationinclinicalpractice AT thotaanjali capacitycoachingafocusedethnographicevaluationinclinicalpractice AT organickpaige capacitycoachingafocusedethnographicevaluationinclinicalpractice AT havenskathryn capacitycoachingafocusedethnographicevaluationinclinicalpractice AT shahnilayd capacitycoachingafocusedethnographicevaluationinclinicalpractice |