Cargando…

Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains highly prevalent in medically ill patients, and often leads to increased mortality and cost burden during hospitalization and post-discharge. Nearly half of all VTEs occur during or after hospitalization, with pulmonary embolism accounting for 10% of inpatient mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skeik, Nedaa, Westergard, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.19-00115
_version_ 1783518930819612672
author Skeik, Nedaa
Westergard, Emily
author_facet Skeik, Nedaa
Westergard, Emily
author_sort Skeik, Nedaa
collection PubMed
description Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains highly prevalent in medically ill patients, and often leads to increased mortality and cost burden during hospitalization and post-discharge. Nearly half of all VTEs occur during or after hospitalization, with pulmonary embolism accounting for 10% of inpatient mortality. Appropriate prophylaxis in high-risk medically ill patients has been shown to reduce risk of VTE and related mortality. Despite current evidence-based guidelines, VTE prophylaxis has been under-used. This owes greatly to ambiguity and concerns related to appropriate patient and prophylactic agent selection, and duration of prophylaxis. Because many acutely ill medical patients have multiple comorbidities, the risk of major bleeding must be considered when choosing to implement pharmacological VTE prophylaxis. Multiple risk assessment models have been developed and validated to help estimate VTE and bleeding risks in this population. While studies have shown that the risk for VTE often extends far beyond hospital discharge, there is no evidence to support extending prophylaxis after hospital discharge. The appropriate selection of VTE prophylaxis requires consideration for cost, availability, patient preference, compliance, and underlying comorbidities. Our paper reviews the current evidence and reasoning for appropriate selection of VTE prophylaxis in acutely medical ill patients, and highlights our own approach and recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7140153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71401532020-04-09 Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients Skeik, Nedaa Westergard, Emily Ann Vasc Dis Review Article Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains highly prevalent in medically ill patients, and often leads to increased mortality and cost burden during hospitalization and post-discharge. Nearly half of all VTEs occur during or after hospitalization, with pulmonary embolism accounting for 10% of inpatient mortality. Appropriate prophylaxis in high-risk medically ill patients has been shown to reduce risk of VTE and related mortality. Despite current evidence-based guidelines, VTE prophylaxis has been under-used. This owes greatly to ambiguity and concerns related to appropriate patient and prophylactic agent selection, and duration of prophylaxis. Because many acutely ill medical patients have multiple comorbidities, the risk of major bleeding must be considered when choosing to implement pharmacological VTE prophylaxis. Multiple risk assessment models have been developed and validated to help estimate VTE and bleeding risks in this population. While studies have shown that the risk for VTE often extends far beyond hospital discharge, there is no evidence to support extending prophylaxis after hospital discharge. The appropriate selection of VTE prophylaxis requires consideration for cost, availability, patient preference, compliance, and underlying comorbidities. Our paper reviews the current evidence and reasoning for appropriate selection of VTE prophylaxis in acutely medical ill patients, and highlights our own approach and recommendations. Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2020-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7140153/ /pubmed/32273920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.19-00115 Text en Copyright © 2020 Annals of Vascular Diseases http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ ©2020 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Review Article
Skeik, Nedaa
Westergard, Emily
Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients
title Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients
title_full Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients
title_fullStr Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients
title_short Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients
title_sort recommendations for vte prophylaxis in medically ill patients
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.19-00115
work_keys_str_mv AT skeiknedaa recommendationsforvteprophylaxisinmedicallyillpatients
AT westergardemily recommendationsforvteprophylaxisinmedicallyillpatients