Cargando…
Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains highly prevalent in medically ill patients, and often leads to increased mortality and cost burden during hospitalization and post-discharge. Nearly half of all VTEs occur during or after hospitalization, with pulmonary embolism accounting for 10% of inpatient mo...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.19-00115 |
_version_ | 1783518930819612672 |
---|---|
author | Skeik, Nedaa Westergard, Emily |
author_facet | Skeik, Nedaa Westergard, Emily |
author_sort | Skeik, Nedaa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains highly prevalent in medically ill patients, and often leads to increased mortality and cost burden during hospitalization and post-discharge. Nearly half of all VTEs occur during or after hospitalization, with pulmonary embolism accounting for 10% of inpatient mortality. Appropriate prophylaxis in high-risk medically ill patients has been shown to reduce risk of VTE and related mortality. Despite current evidence-based guidelines, VTE prophylaxis has been under-used. This owes greatly to ambiguity and concerns related to appropriate patient and prophylactic agent selection, and duration of prophylaxis. Because many acutely ill medical patients have multiple comorbidities, the risk of major bleeding must be considered when choosing to implement pharmacological VTE prophylaxis. Multiple risk assessment models have been developed and validated to help estimate VTE and bleeding risks in this population. While studies have shown that the risk for VTE often extends far beyond hospital discharge, there is no evidence to support extending prophylaxis after hospital discharge. The appropriate selection of VTE prophylaxis requires consideration for cost, availability, patient preference, compliance, and underlying comorbidities. Our paper reviews the current evidence and reasoning for appropriate selection of VTE prophylaxis in acutely medical ill patients, and highlights our own approach and recommendations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7140153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71401532020-04-09 Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients Skeik, Nedaa Westergard, Emily Ann Vasc Dis Review Article Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains highly prevalent in medically ill patients, and often leads to increased mortality and cost burden during hospitalization and post-discharge. Nearly half of all VTEs occur during or after hospitalization, with pulmonary embolism accounting for 10% of inpatient mortality. Appropriate prophylaxis in high-risk medically ill patients has been shown to reduce risk of VTE and related mortality. Despite current evidence-based guidelines, VTE prophylaxis has been under-used. This owes greatly to ambiguity and concerns related to appropriate patient and prophylactic agent selection, and duration of prophylaxis. Because many acutely ill medical patients have multiple comorbidities, the risk of major bleeding must be considered when choosing to implement pharmacological VTE prophylaxis. Multiple risk assessment models have been developed and validated to help estimate VTE and bleeding risks in this population. While studies have shown that the risk for VTE often extends far beyond hospital discharge, there is no evidence to support extending prophylaxis after hospital discharge. The appropriate selection of VTE prophylaxis requires consideration for cost, availability, patient preference, compliance, and underlying comorbidities. Our paper reviews the current evidence and reasoning for appropriate selection of VTE prophylaxis in acutely medical ill patients, and highlights our own approach and recommendations. Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2020-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7140153/ /pubmed/32273920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.19-00115 Text en Copyright © 2020 Annals of Vascular Diseases http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ ©2020 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Skeik, Nedaa Westergard, Emily Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients |
title | Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients |
title_full | Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients |
title_fullStr | Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients |
title_short | Recommendations for VTE Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients |
title_sort | recommendations for vte prophylaxis in medically ill patients |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.19-00115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skeiknedaa recommendationsforvteprophylaxisinmedicallyillpatients AT westergardemily recommendationsforvteprophylaxisinmedicallyillpatients |