Cargando…

The use of a synthetic shoulder patch for large and massive rotator cuff tears – a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of using a non-absorbable biocompatible polyester patch to augment open repair of massive rotator cuff tears (Patch group) and compare outcomes with other treatment options (Non-patch group). METHODS: Participants referred to orthopaed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cowling, P., Hackney, R., Dube, B., Grainger, A. J., Biglands, J. D., Stanley, M., Song, D., Conaghan, P. G., Kingsbury, S. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32264949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03227-z
_version_ 1783519017994027008
author Cowling, P.
Hackney, R.
Dube, B.
Grainger, A. J.
Biglands, J. D.
Stanley, M.
Song, D.
Conaghan, P. G.
Kingsbury, S. R.
author_facet Cowling, P.
Hackney, R.
Dube, B.
Grainger, A. J.
Biglands, J. D.
Stanley, M.
Song, D.
Conaghan, P. G.
Kingsbury, S. R.
author_sort Cowling, P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of using a non-absorbable biocompatible polyester patch to augment open repair of massive rotator cuff tears (Patch group) and compare outcomes with other treatment options (Non-patch group). METHODS: Participants referred to orthopaedic clinics for rotator cuff surgery were recruited. Choice of intervention (Patch or Non-patch) was based on patient preference and intra-operative findings. Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and Constant score were completed at baseline and 6 months. Shoulder MRI was performed at baseline and 6 months to assess fat fraction and Goutallier classification pre- and post- treatment. Feasibility outcomes (including retention, consent and missing data) were assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-eight participants (29 in the Patch group, 39 in Non-patch group) were included (mean age 65.3 years). Conversion to consent (92.6%), missing data (0% at baseline), and attrition rate (16%) were deemed successful feasibility endpoints. There was significant improvement in the Patch group compared to Non-patch at 6 months in OSS (difference in medians 9.76 (95% CI 2.25, 17.29) and SPADI: 22.97 (95% CI 3.02, 42.92), with no substantive differences in Constant score. The patch group had a higher proportion of participants improving greater than MCID for OSS (78% vs 62%) and SPADI (63% vs 50%) respectively. Analysis of the 48 paired MRIs demonstrated a slight increase in the fat fraction for supraspinatus (53 to 55%), and infraspinatus (26 to 29%) at 6 months. These differences were similar and in the same direction when the participants were analysed by treatment group. The Goutallier score remained the same or worsened one grade in both groups equally. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that a definitive clinical trial investigating the use of a non-absorbable patch to augment repair of massive rotator cuff tears is feasible. In such patients, the patch has the potential to improve shoulder symptoms at 6 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN79844053, Registered 15th October 2014 (retrospectively registered).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7140555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71405552020-04-14 The use of a synthetic shoulder patch for large and massive rotator cuff tears – a feasibility study Cowling, P. Hackney, R. Dube, B. Grainger, A. J. Biglands, J. D. Stanley, M. Song, D. Conaghan, P. G. Kingsbury, S. R. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of using a non-absorbable biocompatible polyester patch to augment open repair of massive rotator cuff tears (Patch group) and compare outcomes with other treatment options (Non-patch group). METHODS: Participants referred to orthopaedic clinics for rotator cuff surgery were recruited. Choice of intervention (Patch or Non-patch) was based on patient preference and intra-operative findings. Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and Constant score were completed at baseline and 6 months. Shoulder MRI was performed at baseline and 6 months to assess fat fraction and Goutallier classification pre- and post- treatment. Feasibility outcomes (including retention, consent and missing data) were assessed. RESULTS: Sixty-eight participants (29 in the Patch group, 39 in Non-patch group) were included (mean age 65.3 years). Conversion to consent (92.6%), missing data (0% at baseline), and attrition rate (16%) were deemed successful feasibility endpoints. There was significant improvement in the Patch group compared to Non-patch at 6 months in OSS (difference in medians 9.76 (95% CI 2.25, 17.29) and SPADI: 22.97 (95% CI 3.02, 42.92), with no substantive differences in Constant score. The patch group had a higher proportion of participants improving greater than MCID for OSS (78% vs 62%) and SPADI (63% vs 50%) respectively. Analysis of the 48 paired MRIs demonstrated a slight increase in the fat fraction for supraspinatus (53 to 55%), and infraspinatus (26 to 29%) at 6 months. These differences were similar and in the same direction when the participants were analysed by treatment group. The Goutallier score remained the same or worsened one grade in both groups equally. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that a definitive clinical trial investigating the use of a non-absorbable patch to augment repair of massive rotator cuff tears is feasible. In such patients, the patch has the potential to improve shoulder symptoms at 6 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN79844053, Registered 15th October 2014 (retrospectively registered). BioMed Central 2020-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7140555/ /pubmed/32264949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03227-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cowling, P.
Hackney, R.
Dube, B.
Grainger, A. J.
Biglands, J. D.
Stanley, M.
Song, D.
Conaghan, P. G.
Kingsbury, S. R.
The use of a synthetic shoulder patch for large and massive rotator cuff tears – a feasibility study
title The use of a synthetic shoulder patch for large and massive rotator cuff tears – a feasibility study
title_full The use of a synthetic shoulder patch for large and massive rotator cuff tears – a feasibility study
title_fullStr The use of a synthetic shoulder patch for large and massive rotator cuff tears – a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed The use of a synthetic shoulder patch for large and massive rotator cuff tears – a feasibility study
title_short The use of a synthetic shoulder patch for large and massive rotator cuff tears – a feasibility study
title_sort use of a synthetic shoulder patch for large and massive rotator cuff tears – a feasibility study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32264949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03227-z
work_keys_str_mv AT cowlingp theuseofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT hackneyr theuseofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT dubeb theuseofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT graingeraj theuseofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT biglandsjd theuseofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT stanleym theuseofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT songd theuseofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT conaghanpg theuseofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT kingsburysr theuseofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT cowlingp useofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT hackneyr useofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT dubeb useofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT graingeraj useofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT biglandsjd useofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT stanleym useofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT songd useofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT conaghanpg useofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy
AT kingsburysr useofasyntheticshoulderpatchforlargeandmassiverotatorcufftearsafeasibilitystudy