Cargando…
Use of alternative bioassays to explore the impact of pyrethroid resistance on LLIN efficacy
BACKGROUND: There is substantial concern that the spread of insecticide resistance will render long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) ineffective. However, there is limited evidence supporting a clear association between insecticide resistance and malaria incidence or prevalence in the field....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32264935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04055-9 |
_version_ | 1783519021768900608 |
---|---|
author | Grossman, Marissa K. Oliver, Shüné V. Brooke, Basil D. Thomas, Matthew B. |
author_facet | Grossman, Marissa K. Oliver, Shüné V. Brooke, Basil D. Thomas, Matthew B. |
author_sort | Grossman, Marissa K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is substantial concern that the spread of insecticide resistance will render long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) ineffective. However, there is limited evidence supporting a clear association between insecticide resistance and malaria incidence or prevalence in the field. We suggest that one reason for this disconnect is that the standard WHO assays used in surveillance to classify mosquito populations as resistant are not designed to determine how resistance might impact LLIN efficacy. The standard assays expose young, unfed female mosquitoes to a diagnostic insecticide dose in a single, forced exposure, whereas in the field, mosquitoes vary in their age, blood-feeding status, and the frequency or intensity of LLIN exposure. These more realistic conditions could ultimately impact the capacity of “resistant” mosquitoes to transmit malaria. METHODS: Here, we test this hypothesis using two different assays that allow female mosquitoes to contact a LLIN as they host-seek and blood-feed. We quantified mortality after both single and multiple exposures, using seven different strains of Anopheles ranging in pyrethroid resistance intensity. RESULTS: We found that strains classified as 1×-resistant to the pyrethroid insecticide deltamethrin in the standard WHO assay exhibited > 90% mortality over 24 h following more realistic LLIN contact. Mosquitoes that were able to blood-feed had increased survival compared to their unfed counterparts, but none of the 1×-resistant strains survived for 12 days post-exposure (the typical period for malaria parasite development within the mosquito). Mosquitoes that were 5×- and 10×-resistant (i.e. moderate or high intensity resistance based on the WHO assays) survived a single LLIN exposure well. However, only about 2–3% of these mosquitoes survived multiple exposures over the course of 12 days and successfully blood-fed during the last exposure. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the standard assays provide limited insight into how resistance might impact LLIN efficacy. In our laboratory setting, there appears little functional consequence of 1×-resistance and even mosquitoes with moderate (5×) or high (10×) intensity resistance can suffer substantial reduction in transmission potential. Monitoring efforts should focus on better characterizing intensity of resistance to inform resistance management strategies and prioritize deployment of next generation vector control products. [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7140572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71405722020-04-14 Use of alternative bioassays to explore the impact of pyrethroid resistance on LLIN efficacy Grossman, Marissa K. Oliver, Shüné V. Brooke, Basil D. Thomas, Matthew B. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: There is substantial concern that the spread of insecticide resistance will render long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) ineffective. However, there is limited evidence supporting a clear association between insecticide resistance and malaria incidence or prevalence in the field. We suggest that one reason for this disconnect is that the standard WHO assays used in surveillance to classify mosquito populations as resistant are not designed to determine how resistance might impact LLIN efficacy. The standard assays expose young, unfed female mosquitoes to a diagnostic insecticide dose in a single, forced exposure, whereas in the field, mosquitoes vary in their age, blood-feeding status, and the frequency or intensity of LLIN exposure. These more realistic conditions could ultimately impact the capacity of “resistant” mosquitoes to transmit malaria. METHODS: Here, we test this hypothesis using two different assays that allow female mosquitoes to contact a LLIN as they host-seek and blood-feed. We quantified mortality after both single and multiple exposures, using seven different strains of Anopheles ranging in pyrethroid resistance intensity. RESULTS: We found that strains classified as 1×-resistant to the pyrethroid insecticide deltamethrin in the standard WHO assay exhibited > 90% mortality over 24 h following more realistic LLIN contact. Mosquitoes that were able to blood-feed had increased survival compared to their unfed counterparts, but none of the 1×-resistant strains survived for 12 days post-exposure (the typical period for malaria parasite development within the mosquito). Mosquitoes that were 5×- and 10×-resistant (i.e. moderate or high intensity resistance based on the WHO assays) survived a single LLIN exposure well. However, only about 2–3% of these mosquitoes survived multiple exposures over the course of 12 days and successfully blood-fed during the last exposure. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the standard assays provide limited insight into how resistance might impact LLIN efficacy. In our laboratory setting, there appears little functional consequence of 1×-resistance and even mosquitoes with moderate (5×) or high (10×) intensity resistance can suffer substantial reduction in transmission potential. Monitoring efforts should focus on better characterizing intensity of resistance to inform resistance management strategies and prioritize deployment of next generation vector control products. [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2020-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7140572/ /pubmed/32264935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04055-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Grossman, Marissa K. Oliver, Shüné V. Brooke, Basil D. Thomas, Matthew B. Use of alternative bioassays to explore the impact of pyrethroid resistance on LLIN efficacy |
title | Use of alternative bioassays to explore the impact of pyrethroid resistance on LLIN efficacy |
title_full | Use of alternative bioassays to explore the impact of pyrethroid resistance on LLIN efficacy |
title_fullStr | Use of alternative bioassays to explore the impact of pyrethroid resistance on LLIN efficacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of alternative bioassays to explore the impact of pyrethroid resistance on LLIN efficacy |
title_short | Use of alternative bioassays to explore the impact of pyrethroid resistance on LLIN efficacy |
title_sort | use of alternative bioassays to explore the impact of pyrethroid resistance on llin efficacy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32264935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04055-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grossmanmarissak useofalternativebioassaystoexploretheimpactofpyrethroidresistanceonllinefficacy AT olivershunev useofalternativebioassaystoexploretheimpactofpyrethroidresistanceonllinefficacy AT brookebasild useofalternativebioassaystoexploretheimpactofpyrethroidresistanceonllinefficacy AT thomasmatthewb useofalternativebioassaystoexploretheimpactofpyrethroidresistanceonllinefficacy |