Cargando…

Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm?

Our immune system can destroy most cells in our body, an ability that needs to be tightly controlled. To prevent autoimmunity, the thymic medulla exposes developing T cells to normal “self” peptides and prevents any responders from entering the bloodstream. However, a substantial number of self-reac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wortel, Inge M. N., Keşmir, Can, de Boer, Rob J., Mandl, Judith N., Textor, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168897
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9030690
_version_ 1783519044036460544
author Wortel, Inge M. N.
Keşmir, Can
de Boer, Rob J.
Mandl, Judith N.
Textor, Johannes
author_facet Wortel, Inge M. N.
Keşmir, Can
de Boer, Rob J.
Mandl, Judith N.
Textor, Johannes
author_sort Wortel, Inge M. N.
collection PubMed
description Our immune system can destroy most cells in our body, an ability that needs to be tightly controlled. To prevent autoimmunity, the thymic medulla exposes developing T cells to normal “self” peptides and prevents any responders from entering the bloodstream. However, a substantial number of self-reactive T cells nevertheless reaches the periphery, implying that T cells do not encounter all self peptides during this negative selection process. It is unclear if T cells can still discriminate foreign peptides from self peptides they haven’t encountered during negative selection. We use an “artificial immune system”—a machine learning model of the T cell repertoire—to investigate how negative selection could alter the recognition of self peptides that are absent from the thymus. Our model reveals a surprising new role for T cell cross-reactivity in this context: moderate T cell cross-reactivity should skew the post-selection repertoire towards peptides that differ systematically from self. Moreover, even some self-like foreign peptides can be distinguished provided that the peptides presented in the thymus are not too similar to each other. Thus, our model predicts that negative selection on a well-chosen subset of self peptides would generate a repertoire that tolerates even “unseen” self peptides better than foreign peptides. This effect would resemble a “generalization” process as it is found in learning systems. We discuss potential experimental approaches to test our theory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7140671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71406712020-04-13 Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm? Wortel, Inge M. N. Keşmir, Can de Boer, Rob J. Mandl, Judith N. Textor, Johannes Cells Article Our immune system can destroy most cells in our body, an ability that needs to be tightly controlled. To prevent autoimmunity, the thymic medulla exposes developing T cells to normal “self” peptides and prevents any responders from entering the bloodstream. However, a substantial number of self-reactive T cells nevertheless reaches the periphery, implying that T cells do not encounter all self peptides during this negative selection process. It is unclear if T cells can still discriminate foreign peptides from self peptides they haven’t encountered during negative selection. We use an “artificial immune system”—a machine learning model of the T cell repertoire—to investigate how negative selection could alter the recognition of self peptides that are absent from the thymus. Our model reveals a surprising new role for T cell cross-reactivity in this context: moderate T cell cross-reactivity should skew the post-selection repertoire towards peptides that differ systematically from self. Moreover, even some self-like foreign peptides can be distinguished provided that the peptides presented in the thymus are not too similar to each other. Thus, our model predicts that negative selection on a well-chosen subset of self peptides would generate a repertoire that tolerates even “unseen” self peptides better than foreign peptides. This effect would resemble a “generalization” process as it is found in learning systems. We discuss potential experimental approaches to test our theory. MDPI 2020-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7140671/ /pubmed/32168897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9030690 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wortel, Inge M. N.
Keşmir, Can
de Boer, Rob J.
Mandl, Judith N.
Textor, Johannes
Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm?
title Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm?
title_full Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm?
title_fullStr Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm?
title_full_unstemmed Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm?
title_short Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm?
title_sort is t cell negative selection a learning algorithm?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168897
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9030690
work_keys_str_mv AT wortelingemn istcellnegativeselectionalearningalgorithm
AT kesmircan istcellnegativeselectionalearningalgorithm
AT deboerrobj istcellnegativeselectionalearningalgorithm
AT mandljudithn istcellnegativeselectionalearningalgorithm
AT textorjohannes istcellnegativeselectionalearningalgorithm