Cargando…
Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm?
Our immune system can destroy most cells in our body, an ability that needs to be tightly controlled. To prevent autoimmunity, the thymic medulla exposes developing T cells to normal “self” peptides and prevents any responders from entering the bloodstream. However, a substantial number of self-reac...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9030690 |
_version_ | 1783519044036460544 |
---|---|
author | Wortel, Inge M. N. Keşmir, Can de Boer, Rob J. Mandl, Judith N. Textor, Johannes |
author_facet | Wortel, Inge M. N. Keşmir, Can de Boer, Rob J. Mandl, Judith N. Textor, Johannes |
author_sort | Wortel, Inge M. N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our immune system can destroy most cells in our body, an ability that needs to be tightly controlled. To prevent autoimmunity, the thymic medulla exposes developing T cells to normal “self” peptides and prevents any responders from entering the bloodstream. However, a substantial number of self-reactive T cells nevertheless reaches the periphery, implying that T cells do not encounter all self peptides during this negative selection process. It is unclear if T cells can still discriminate foreign peptides from self peptides they haven’t encountered during negative selection. We use an “artificial immune system”—a machine learning model of the T cell repertoire—to investigate how negative selection could alter the recognition of self peptides that are absent from the thymus. Our model reveals a surprising new role for T cell cross-reactivity in this context: moderate T cell cross-reactivity should skew the post-selection repertoire towards peptides that differ systematically from self. Moreover, even some self-like foreign peptides can be distinguished provided that the peptides presented in the thymus are not too similar to each other. Thus, our model predicts that negative selection on a well-chosen subset of self peptides would generate a repertoire that tolerates even “unseen” self peptides better than foreign peptides. This effect would resemble a “generalization” process as it is found in learning systems. We discuss potential experimental approaches to test our theory. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7140671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71406712020-04-13 Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm? Wortel, Inge M. N. Keşmir, Can de Boer, Rob J. Mandl, Judith N. Textor, Johannes Cells Article Our immune system can destroy most cells in our body, an ability that needs to be tightly controlled. To prevent autoimmunity, the thymic medulla exposes developing T cells to normal “self” peptides and prevents any responders from entering the bloodstream. However, a substantial number of self-reactive T cells nevertheless reaches the periphery, implying that T cells do not encounter all self peptides during this negative selection process. It is unclear if T cells can still discriminate foreign peptides from self peptides they haven’t encountered during negative selection. We use an “artificial immune system”—a machine learning model of the T cell repertoire—to investigate how negative selection could alter the recognition of self peptides that are absent from the thymus. Our model reveals a surprising new role for T cell cross-reactivity in this context: moderate T cell cross-reactivity should skew the post-selection repertoire towards peptides that differ systematically from self. Moreover, even some self-like foreign peptides can be distinguished provided that the peptides presented in the thymus are not too similar to each other. Thus, our model predicts that negative selection on a well-chosen subset of self peptides would generate a repertoire that tolerates even “unseen” self peptides better than foreign peptides. This effect would resemble a “generalization” process as it is found in learning systems. We discuss potential experimental approaches to test our theory. MDPI 2020-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7140671/ /pubmed/32168897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9030690 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wortel, Inge M. N. Keşmir, Can de Boer, Rob J. Mandl, Judith N. Textor, Johannes Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm? |
title | Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm? |
title_full | Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm? |
title_fullStr | Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm? |
title_short | Is T Cell Negative Selection a Learning Algorithm? |
title_sort | is t cell negative selection a learning algorithm? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9030690 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wortelingemn istcellnegativeselectionalearningalgorithm AT kesmircan istcellnegativeselectionalearningalgorithm AT deboerrobj istcellnegativeselectionalearningalgorithm AT mandljudithn istcellnegativeselectionalearningalgorithm AT textorjohannes istcellnegativeselectionalearningalgorithm |