Cargando…
What Matters Most to Patients and Rheumatologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Rheumatoid Arthritis
INTRODUCTION: To determine patient and rheumatologist preferences for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment attributes in Spain and to evaluate their attitude towards shared decision-making (SDM). METHODS: Observational, descriptive, exploratory and cross-sectional study based on a discrete choice exp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32088860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01258-5 |
_version_ | 1783519062637150208 |
---|---|
author | Díaz-Torné, Cesar Urruticoechea-Arana, Ana Ivorra-Cortés, José Díaz, Silvia Dilla, Tatiana Sacristán, José Antonio Inciarte-Mundo, José Comellas, Marta Prades, Miriam Lizán, Luis |
author_facet | Díaz-Torné, Cesar Urruticoechea-Arana, Ana Ivorra-Cortés, José Díaz, Silvia Dilla, Tatiana Sacristán, José Antonio Inciarte-Mundo, José Comellas, Marta Prades, Miriam Lizán, Luis |
author_sort | Díaz-Torné, Cesar |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To determine patient and rheumatologist preferences for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment attributes in Spain and to evaluate their attitude towards shared decision-making (SDM). METHODS: Observational, descriptive, exploratory and cross-sectional study based on a discrete choice experiment (DCE). To identify the attributes and their levels, a literature review and two focus groups (patients [P] = 5; rheumatologists [R] = 4) were undertaken. Seven attributes with 2–4 levels were presented in eight scenarios. Attribute utility and relative importance (RI) were assessed using a conditional logit model. Patient preferences for SDM were assessed using an ad hoc questionnaire. RESULTS: Ninety rheumatologists [52.2% women; mean years of experience 18.1 (SD: 9.0); seeing an average of 24.4 RA patients/week (SD: 15.3)] and 137 RA patients [mean age: 47.5 years (SD: 10.7); 84.0% women; mean time since diagnosis of RA: 14.2 years (SD: 11.8) and time in treatment: 13.2 years (SD: 11.2), mean HAQ score 1.2 (SD: 0.7)] participated in the study. In terms of RI, rheumatologists and RA patients viewed: time with optimal QoL: R: 23.41%/P: 35.05%; substantial symptom improvement: R: 13.15%/P: 3.62%; time to onset of treatment action: R: 16.24%/P: 13.56%; severe adverse events: R: 10.89%/P: 11.20%; mild adverse events: R: 4.16%/P: 0.91%; mode of administration: R: 25.23%/P: 25.00%; and added cost: R: 6.93%/P: 10.66%. Nearly 73% of RA patients were involved in treatment decision-making to a greater or lesser extent; however, 27.4% did not participate at all. CONCLUSION: Both for rheumatologists and patients, the top three decision-making drivers are time with optimal quality, treatment mode of administration and time to onset of action, although in different ranking order. Patients were willing to be more involved in the treatment decision-making process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01258-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7140752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71407522020-04-14 What Matters Most to Patients and Rheumatologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Rheumatoid Arthritis Díaz-Torné, Cesar Urruticoechea-Arana, Ana Ivorra-Cortés, José Díaz, Silvia Dilla, Tatiana Sacristán, José Antonio Inciarte-Mundo, José Comellas, Marta Prades, Miriam Lizán, Luis Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: To determine patient and rheumatologist preferences for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment attributes in Spain and to evaluate their attitude towards shared decision-making (SDM). METHODS: Observational, descriptive, exploratory and cross-sectional study based on a discrete choice experiment (DCE). To identify the attributes and their levels, a literature review and two focus groups (patients [P] = 5; rheumatologists [R] = 4) were undertaken. Seven attributes with 2–4 levels were presented in eight scenarios. Attribute utility and relative importance (RI) were assessed using a conditional logit model. Patient preferences for SDM were assessed using an ad hoc questionnaire. RESULTS: Ninety rheumatologists [52.2% women; mean years of experience 18.1 (SD: 9.0); seeing an average of 24.4 RA patients/week (SD: 15.3)] and 137 RA patients [mean age: 47.5 years (SD: 10.7); 84.0% women; mean time since diagnosis of RA: 14.2 years (SD: 11.8) and time in treatment: 13.2 years (SD: 11.2), mean HAQ score 1.2 (SD: 0.7)] participated in the study. In terms of RI, rheumatologists and RA patients viewed: time with optimal QoL: R: 23.41%/P: 35.05%; substantial symptom improvement: R: 13.15%/P: 3.62%; time to onset of treatment action: R: 16.24%/P: 13.56%; severe adverse events: R: 10.89%/P: 11.20%; mild adverse events: R: 4.16%/P: 0.91%; mode of administration: R: 25.23%/P: 25.00%; and added cost: R: 6.93%/P: 10.66%. Nearly 73% of RA patients were involved in treatment decision-making to a greater or lesser extent; however, 27.4% did not participate at all. CONCLUSION: Both for rheumatologists and patients, the top three decision-making drivers are time with optimal quality, treatment mode of administration and time to onset of action, although in different ranking order. Patients were willing to be more involved in the treatment decision-making process. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01258-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-02-22 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7140752/ /pubmed/32088860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01258-5 Text en © Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Díaz-Torné, Cesar Urruticoechea-Arana, Ana Ivorra-Cortés, José Díaz, Silvia Dilla, Tatiana Sacristán, José Antonio Inciarte-Mundo, José Comellas, Marta Prades, Miriam Lizán, Luis What Matters Most to Patients and Rheumatologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title | What Matters Most to Patients and Rheumatologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_full | What Matters Most to Patients and Rheumatologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_fullStr | What Matters Most to Patients and Rheumatologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | What Matters Most to Patients and Rheumatologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_short | What Matters Most to Patients and Rheumatologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Rheumatoid Arthritis |
title_sort | what matters most to patients and rheumatologists? a discrete choice experiment in rheumatoid arthritis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32088860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01258-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diaztornecesar whatmattersmosttopatientsandrheumatologistsadiscretechoiceexperimentinrheumatoidarthritis AT urruticoecheaaranaana whatmattersmosttopatientsandrheumatologistsadiscretechoiceexperimentinrheumatoidarthritis AT ivorracortesjose whatmattersmosttopatientsandrheumatologistsadiscretechoiceexperimentinrheumatoidarthritis AT diazsilvia whatmattersmosttopatientsandrheumatologistsadiscretechoiceexperimentinrheumatoidarthritis AT dillatatiana whatmattersmosttopatientsandrheumatologistsadiscretechoiceexperimentinrheumatoidarthritis AT sacristanjoseantonio whatmattersmosttopatientsandrheumatologistsadiscretechoiceexperimentinrheumatoidarthritis AT inciartemundojose whatmattersmosttopatientsandrheumatologistsadiscretechoiceexperimentinrheumatoidarthritis AT comellasmarta whatmattersmosttopatientsandrheumatologistsadiscretechoiceexperimentinrheumatoidarthritis AT pradesmiriam whatmattersmosttopatientsandrheumatologistsadiscretechoiceexperimentinrheumatoidarthritis AT lizanluis whatmattersmosttopatientsandrheumatologistsadiscretechoiceexperimentinrheumatoidarthritis |