Cargando…

Standards for Methods Utilizing Environmental DNA for Detection of Fish Species

Environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques are gaining attention as cost-effective, non-invasive strategies for acquiring information on fish and other aquatic organisms from water samples. Currently, eDNA approaches are used to detect specific fish species and determine fish community diversity. Various p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shu, Lu, Ludwig, Arne, Peng, Zuogang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168762
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11030296
_version_ 1783519074900246528
author Shu, Lu
Ludwig, Arne
Peng, Zuogang
author_facet Shu, Lu
Ludwig, Arne
Peng, Zuogang
author_sort Shu, Lu
collection PubMed
description Environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques are gaining attention as cost-effective, non-invasive strategies for acquiring information on fish and other aquatic organisms from water samples. Currently, eDNA approaches are used to detect specific fish species and determine fish community diversity. Various protocols used with eDNA methods for aquatic organism detection have been reported in different eDNA studies, but there are no general recommendations for fish detection. Herein, we reviewed 168 papers to supplement and highlight the key criteria for each step of eDNA technology in fish detection and provide general suggestions for eliminating detection errors. Although there is no unified recommendation for the application of diverse eDNA in detecting fish species, in most cases, 1 or 2 L surface water collection and eDNA capture on 0.7-μm glass fiber filters followed by extraction with a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit or PowerWater DNA Isolation Kit are useful for obtaining high-quality eDNA. Subsequently, species-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays based on mitochondrial cytochrome b gene markers or eDNA metabarcoding based on both 12S and 16S rRNA markers via high-throughput sequencing can effectively detect target DNA or estimate species richness. Furthermore, detection errors can be minimized by mitigating contamination, negative control, PCR replication, and using multiple genetic markers. Our aim is to provide a useful strategy for fish eDNA technology that can be applied by researchers, advisors, and managers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7140814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71408142020-04-10 Standards for Methods Utilizing Environmental DNA for Detection of Fish Species Shu, Lu Ludwig, Arne Peng, Zuogang Genes (Basel) Review Environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques are gaining attention as cost-effective, non-invasive strategies for acquiring information on fish and other aquatic organisms from water samples. Currently, eDNA approaches are used to detect specific fish species and determine fish community diversity. Various protocols used with eDNA methods for aquatic organism detection have been reported in different eDNA studies, but there are no general recommendations for fish detection. Herein, we reviewed 168 papers to supplement and highlight the key criteria for each step of eDNA technology in fish detection and provide general suggestions for eliminating detection errors. Although there is no unified recommendation for the application of diverse eDNA in detecting fish species, in most cases, 1 or 2 L surface water collection and eDNA capture on 0.7-μm glass fiber filters followed by extraction with a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit or PowerWater DNA Isolation Kit are useful for obtaining high-quality eDNA. Subsequently, species-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays based on mitochondrial cytochrome b gene markers or eDNA metabarcoding based on both 12S and 16S rRNA markers via high-throughput sequencing can effectively detect target DNA or estimate species richness. Furthermore, detection errors can be minimized by mitigating contamination, negative control, PCR replication, and using multiple genetic markers. Our aim is to provide a useful strategy for fish eDNA technology that can be applied by researchers, advisors, and managers. MDPI 2020-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7140814/ /pubmed/32168762 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11030296 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Shu, Lu
Ludwig, Arne
Peng, Zuogang
Standards for Methods Utilizing Environmental DNA for Detection of Fish Species
title Standards for Methods Utilizing Environmental DNA for Detection of Fish Species
title_full Standards for Methods Utilizing Environmental DNA for Detection of Fish Species
title_fullStr Standards for Methods Utilizing Environmental DNA for Detection of Fish Species
title_full_unstemmed Standards for Methods Utilizing Environmental DNA for Detection of Fish Species
title_short Standards for Methods Utilizing Environmental DNA for Detection of Fish Species
title_sort standards for methods utilizing environmental dna for detection of fish species
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168762
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11030296
work_keys_str_mv AT shulu standardsformethodsutilizingenvironmentaldnafordetectionoffishspecies
AT ludwigarne standardsformethodsutilizingenvironmentaldnafordetectionoffishspecies
AT pengzuogang standardsformethodsutilizingenvironmentaldnafordetectionoffishspecies