Cargando…

Electrical Stimulation Induces Retinal Müller Cell Proliferation and Their Progenitor Cell Potential

Non-invasive electrical stimulation (ES) is increasingly applied to improve vision in untreatable eye conditions, such as retinitis pigmentosa and age-related macular degeneration. Our previous study suggested that ES promoted retinal function and the proliferation of progenitor-like glial cells in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Enayati, Sam, Chang, Karen, Achour, Hamida, Cho, Kin-Sang, Xu, Fuyi, Guo, Shuai, Z. Enayati, Katarina, Xie, Jia, Zhao, Eric, Turunen, Tytteli, Sehic, Amer, Lu, Lu, Utheim, Tor Paaske, Chen, Dong Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32210151
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9030781
_version_ 1783519083406295040
author Enayati, Sam
Chang, Karen
Achour, Hamida
Cho, Kin-Sang
Xu, Fuyi
Guo, Shuai
Z. Enayati, Katarina
Xie, Jia
Zhao, Eric
Turunen, Tytteli
Sehic, Amer
Lu, Lu
Utheim, Tor Paaske
Chen, Dong Feng
author_facet Enayati, Sam
Chang, Karen
Achour, Hamida
Cho, Kin-Sang
Xu, Fuyi
Guo, Shuai
Z. Enayati, Katarina
Xie, Jia
Zhao, Eric
Turunen, Tytteli
Sehic, Amer
Lu, Lu
Utheim, Tor Paaske
Chen, Dong Feng
author_sort Enayati, Sam
collection PubMed
description Non-invasive electrical stimulation (ES) is increasingly applied to improve vision in untreatable eye conditions, such as retinitis pigmentosa and age-related macular degeneration. Our previous study suggested that ES promoted retinal function and the proliferation of progenitor-like glial cells in mice with inherited photoreceptor degeneration; however, the underlying mechanism remains obscure. Müller cells (MCs) are thought to be dormant residential progenitor cells that possess a high potential for retinal neuron repair and functional plasticity. Here, we showed that ES with a ramp waveform of 20 Hz and 300 µA of current was effective at inducing mouse MC proliferation and enhancing their expression of progenitor cell markers, such as Crx (cone–rod homeobox) and Wnt7, as well as their production of trophic factors, including ciliary neurotrophic factor. RNA sequencing revealed that calcium signaling pathway activation was a key event, with a false discovery rate of 5.33 × 10(−8) (p = 1.78 × 10(−10)) in ES-mediated gene profiling changes. Moreover, the calcium channel blocker, nifedipine, abolished the observed effects of ES on MC proliferation and progenitor cell gene induction, supporting a central role of ES-induced Ca(2+) signaling in the MC changes. Our results suggest that low-current ES may present a convenient tool for manipulating MC behavior toward neuroregeneration and repair.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7140850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71408502020-04-10 Electrical Stimulation Induces Retinal Müller Cell Proliferation and Their Progenitor Cell Potential Enayati, Sam Chang, Karen Achour, Hamida Cho, Kin-Sang Xu, Fuyi Guo, Shuai Z. Enayati, Katarina Xie, Jia Zhao, Eric Turunen, Tytteli Sehic, Amer Lu, Lu Utheim, Tor Paaske Chen, Dong Feng Cells Article Non-invasive electrical stimulation (ES) is increasingly applied to improve vision in untreatable eye conditions, such as retinitis pigmentosa and age-related macular degeneration. Our previous study suggested that ES promoted retinal function and the proliferation of progenitor-like glial cells in mice with inherited photoreceptor degeneration; however, the underlying mechanism remains obscure. Müller cells (MCs) are thought to be dormant residential progenitor cells that possess a high potential for retinal neuron repair and functional plasticity. Here, we showed that ES with a ramp waveform of 20 Hz and 300 µA of current was effective at inducing mouse MC proliferation and enhancing their expression of progenitor cell markers, such as Crx (cone–rod homeobox) and Wnt7, as well as their production of trophic factors, including ciliary neurotrophic factor. RNA sequencing revealed that calcium signaling pathway activation was a key event, with a false discovery rate of 5.33 × 10(−8) (p = 1.78 × 10(−10)) in ES-mediated gene profiling changes. Moreover, the calcium channel blocker, nifedipine, abolished the observed effects of ES on MC proliferation and progenitor cell gene induction, supporting a central role of ES-induced Ca(2+) signaling in the MC changes. Our results suggest that low-current ES may present a convenient tool for manipulating MC behavior toward neuroregeneration and repair. MDPI 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7140850/ /pubmed/32210151 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9030781 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Enayati, Sam
Chang, Karen
Achour, Hamida
Cho, Kin-Sang
Xu, Fuyi
Guo, Shuai
Z. Enayati, Katarina
Xie, Jia
Zhao, Eric
Turunen, Tytteli
Sehic, Amer
Lu, Lu
Utheim, Tor Paaske
Chen, Dong Feng
Electrical Stimulation Induces Retinal Müller Cell Proliferation and Their Progenitor Cell Potential
title Electrical Stimulation Induces Retinal Müller Cell Proliferation and Their Progenitor Cell Potential
title_full Electrical Stimulation Induces Retinal Müller Cell Proliferation and Their Progenitor Cell Potential
title_fullStr Electrical Stimulation Induces Retinal Müller Cell Proliferation and Their Progenitor Cell Potential
title_full_unstemmed Electrical Stimulation Induces Retinal Müller Cell Proliferation and Their Progenitor Cell Potential
title_short Electrical Stimulation Induces Retinal Müller Cell Proliferation and Their Progenitor Cell Potential
title_sort electrical stimulation induces retinal müller cell proliferation and their progenitor cell potential
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32210151
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells9030781
work_keys_str_mv AT enayatisam electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential
AT changkaren electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential
AT achourhamida electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential
AT chokinsang electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential
AT xufuyi electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential
AT guoshuai electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential
AT zenayatikatarina electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential
AT xiejia electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential
AT zhaoeric electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential
AT turunentytteli electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential
AT sehicamer electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential
AT lulu electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential
AT utheimtorpaaske electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential
AT chendongfeng electricalstimulationinducesretinalmullercellproliferationandtheirprogenitorcellpotential