Cargando…

Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

The current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is again reminding us of the importance of using telehealth to deliver care, especially as means of reducing the risk of cross-contamination caused by close contact. For telehealth to be effective as part of an emergency response it first needs to become a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Anthony C, Thomas, Emma, Snoswell, Centaine L, Haydon, Helen, Mehrotra, Ateev, Clemensen, Jane, Caffery, Liam J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32196391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1357633X20916567
_version_ 1783519097367035904
author Smith, Anthony C
Thomas, Emma
Snoswell, Centaine L
Haydon, Helen
Mehrotra, Ateev
Clemensen, Jane
Caffery, Liam J
author_facet Smith, Anthony C
Thomas, Emma
Snoswell, Centaine L
Haydon, Helen
Mehrotra, Ateev
Clemensen, Jane
Caffery, Liam J
author_sort Smith, Anthony C
collection PubMed
description The current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is again reminding us of the importance of using telehealth to deliver care, especially as means of reducing the risk of cross-contamination caused by close contact. For telehealth to be effective as part of an emergency response it first needs to become a routinely used part of our health system. Hence, it is time to step back and ask why telehealth is not mainstreamed. In this article, we highlight key requirements for this to occur. Strategies to ensure that telehealth is used regularly in acute, post-acute and emergency situations, alongside conventional service delivery methods, include flexible funding arrangements, training and accrediting our health workforce. Telehealth uptake also requires a significant change in management effort and the redesign of existing models of care. Implementing telehealth proactively rather than reactively is more likely to generate greater benefits in the long-term, and help with the everyday (and emergency) challenges in healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7140977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71409772020-04-09 Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Smith, Anthony C Thomas, Emma Snoswell, Centaine L Haydon, Helen Mehrotra, Ateev Clemensen, Jane Caffery, Liam J J Telemed Telecare LEADER: Focus The current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is again reminding us of the importance of using telehealth to deliver care, especially as means of reducing the risk of cross-contamination caused by close contact. For telehealth to be effective as part of an emergency response it first needs to become a routinely used part of our health system. Hence, it is time to step back and ask why telehealth is not mainstreamed. In this article, we highlight key requirements for this to occur. Strategies to ensure that telehealth is used regularly in acute, post-acute and emergency situations, alongside conventional service delivery methods, include flexible funding arrangements, training and accrediting our health workforce. Telehealth uptake also requires a significant change in management effort and the redesign of existing models of care. Implementing telehealth proactively rather than reactively is more likely to generate greater benefits in the long-term, and help with the everyday (and emergency) challenges in healthcare. SAGE Publications 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7140977/ /pubmed/32196391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1357633X20916567 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle LEADER: Focus
Smith, Anthony C
Thomas, Emma
Snoswell, Centaine L
Haydon, Helen
Mehrotra, Ateev
Clemensen, Jane
Caffery, Liam J
Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
title Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
title_full Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
title_fullStr Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
title_full_unstemmed Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
title_short Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
title_sort telehealth for global emergencies: implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19)
topic LEADER: Focus
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7140977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32196391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1357633X20916567
work_keys_str_mv AT smithanthonyc telehealthforglobalemergenciesimplicationsforcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT thomasemma telehealthforglobalemergenciesimplicationsforcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT snoswellcentainel telehealthforglobalemergenciesimplicationsforcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT haydonhelen telehealthforglobalemergenciesimplicationsforcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT mehrotraateev telehealthforglobalemergenciesimplicationsforcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT clemensenjane telehealthforglobalemergenciesimplicationsforcoronavirusdisease2019covid19
AT cafferyliamj telehealthforglobalemergenciesimplicationsforcoronavirusdisease2019covid19