Cargando…
Ways of improving the precision of eye tracking data: Controlling the influence of dirt and dust on pupil detection
Eye-tracking technology has to date been primarily employed in research. With recent advances in affordable video-based devices, the implementation of gaze-aware smartphones, and marketable driver monitoring systems, a considerable step towards pervasive eye-tracking has been made. However, several...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bern Open Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828657 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.10.3.1 |
_version_ | 1783519115285102592 |
---|---|
author | Fuhl, Wolfgang Kübler, Thomas C. Hospach, Dennis Bringmann, Oliver Rosenstiel, Wolfgang Kasneci, Enkelejda |
author_facet | Fuhl, Wolfgang Kübler, Thomas C. Hospach, Dennis Bringmann, Oliver Rosenstiel, Wolfgang Kasneci, Enkelejda |
author_sort | Fuhl, Wolfgang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Eye-tracking technology has to date been primarily employed in research. With recent advances in affordable video-based devices, the implementation of gaze-aware smartphones, and marketable driver monitoring systems, a considerable step towards pervasive eye-tracking has been made. However, several new challenges arise with the usage of eye-tracking in the wild and will need to be tackled to increase the acceptance of this technology. The main challenge is still related to the usage of eye-tracking together with eyeglasses, which in combination with reflections for changing illumination conditions will make a subject "untrackable". If we really want to bring the technology to the consumer, we cannot simply exclude 30% of the population as potential users only because they wear eyeglasses, nor can we make them clean their glasses and the device regularly. Instead, the pupil detection algorithms need to be made robust to potential sources of noise. We hypothesize that the amount of dust and dirt on the eyeglasses and the eye-tracker camera has a significant influence on the performance of currently available pupil detection algorithms. Therefore, in this work, we present a systematic study of the effect of dust and dirt on the pupil detection by simulating various quantities of dirt and dust on eyeglasses. Our results show 1) an overall high robustness to dust in an offfocus layer. 2) the vulnerability of edge-based methods to even small in-focus dust particles. 3) a trade-off between tolerated particle size and particle amount, where a small number of rather large particles showed only a minor performance impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7141060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Bern Open Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71410602021-04-06 Ways of improving the precision of eye tracking data: Controlling the influence of dirt and dust on pupil detection Fuhl, Wolfgang Kübler, Thomas C. Hospach, Dennis Bringmann, Oliver Rosenstiel, Wolfgang Kasneci, Enkelejda J Eye Mov Res Research Article Eye-tracking technology has to date been primarily employed in research. With recent advances in affordable video-based devices, the implementation of gaze-aware smartphones, and marketable driver monitoring systems, a considerable step towards pervasive eye-tracking has been made. However, several new challenges arise with the usage of eye-tracking in the wild and will need to be tackled to increase the acceptance of this technology. The main challenge is still related to the usage of eye-tracking together with eyeglasses, which in combination with reflections for changing illumination conditions will make a subject "untrackable". If we really want to bring the technology to the consumer, we cannot simply exclude 30% of the population as potential users only because they wear eyeglasses, nor can we make them clean their glasses and the device regularly. Instead, the pupil detection algorithms need to be made robust to potential sources of noise. We hypothesize that the amount of dust and dirt on the eyeglasses and the eye-tracker camera has a significant influence on the performance of currently available pupil detection algorithms. Therefore, in this work, we present a systematic study of the effect of dust and dirt on the pupil detection by simulating various quantities of dirt and dust on eyeglasses. Our results show 1) an overall high robustness to dust in an offfocus layer. 2) the vulnerability of edge-based methods to even small in-focus dust particles. 3) a trade-off between tolerated particle size and particle amount, where a small number of rather large particles showed only a minor performance impact. Bern Open Publishing 2017-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7141060/ /pubmed/33828657 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.10.3.1 Text en This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fuhl, Wolfgang Kübler, Thomas C. Hospach, Dennis Bringmann, Oliver Rosenstiel, Wolfgang Kasneci, Enkelejda Ways of improving the precision of eye tracking data: Controlling the influence of dirt and dust on pupil detection |
title | Ways of improving the precision of eye tracking data: Controlling the influence of dirt and dust on pupil detection |
title_full | Ways of improving the precision of eye tracking data: Controlling the influence of dirt and dust on pupil detection |
title_fullStr | Ways of improving the precision of eye tracking data: Controlling the influence of dirt and dust on pupil detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Ways of improving the precision of eye tracking data: Controlling the influence of dirt and dust on pupil detection |
title_short | Ways of improving the precision of eye tracking data: Controlling the influence of dirt and dust on pupil detection |
title_sort | ways of improving the precision of eye tracking data: controlling the influence of dirt and dust on pupil detection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828657 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.10.3.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fuhlwolfgang waysofimprovingtheprecisionofeyetrackingdatacontrollingtheinfluenceofdirtanddustonpupildetection AT kublerthomasc waysofimprovingtheprecisionofeyetrackingdatacontrollingtheinfluenceofdirtanddustonpupildetection AT hospachdennis waysofimprovingtheprecisionofeyetrackingdatacontrollingtheinfluenceofdirtanddustonpupildetection AT bringmannoliver waysofimprovingtheprecisionofeyetrackingdatacontrollingtheinfluenceofdirtanddustonpupildetection AT rosenstielwolfgang waysofimprovingtheprecisionofeyetrackingdatacontrollingtheinfluenceofdirtanddustonpupildetection AT kasnecienkelejda waysofimprovingtheprecisionofeyetrackingdatacontrollingtheinfluenceofdirtanddustonpupildetection |