Cargando…

Less Users More Confidence: How AOIs Don't Affect Scanpath Trend Analysis

User studies are typically difficult, recruiting enough users is often problematic and each experiment takes a considerable amount of time to be completed. In these studies, eye tracking is increasingly used which often increases time, therefore, the lower the number of users required for these stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eraslan, Sukru, Yesilada, Yeliz, Harper, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bern Open Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828666
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.10.4.6
_version_ 1783519121106796544
author Eraslan, Sukru
Yesilada, Yeliz
Harper, Simon
author_facet Eraslan, Sukru
Yesilada, Yeliz
Harper, Simon
author_sort Eraslan, Sukru
collection PubMed
description User studies are typically difficult, recruiting enough users is often problematic and each experiment takes a considerable amount of time to be completed. In these studies, eye tracking is increasingly used which often increases time, therefore, the lower the number of users required for these studies the better for making these kinds of studies more practical in terms of economics and time expended. The possibility of achieving almost the same results with fewer users has already been raised. Specifically, the possibility of achieving 75% similarity to the results of 65 users with 27 users for searching tasks and 34 users for browsing tasks has been observed in scanpath trend analysis which discovers the most commonly followed path on a particular web page in terms of its visual elements or areas of interest (AOIs). Different approaches are available to segment or divide web pages into their visual elements or AOIs. In this paper, we investigate whether the possibility raised by the previous work is restricted to a particular page segmentation approach by replicating the experiments with two other segmentation approaches. The results are consistent with ~5% difference for the searching tasks and ~10% difference for the browsing tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7141090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Bern Open Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71410902021-04-06 Less Users More Confidence: How AOIs Don't Affect Scanpath Trend Analysis Eraslan, Sukru Yesilada, Yeliz Harper, Simon J Eye Mov Res Research Article User studies are typically difficult, recruiting enough users is often problematic and each experiment takes a considerable amount of time to be completed. In these studies, eye tracking is increasingly used which often increases time, therefore, the lower the number of users required for these studies the better for making these kinds of studies more practical in terms of economics and time expended. The possibility of achieving almost the same results with fewer users has already been raised. Specifically, the possibility of achieving 75% similarity to the results of 65 users with 27 users for searching tasks and 34 users for browsing tasks has been observed in scanpath trend analysis which discovers the most commonly followed path on a particular web page in terms of its visual elements or areas of interest (AOIs). Different approaches are available to segment or divide web pages into their visual elements or AOIs. In this paper, we investigate whether the possibility raised by the previous work is restricted to a particular page segmentation approach by replicating the experiments with two other segmentation approaches. The results are consistent with ~5% difference for the searching tasks and ~10% difference for the browsing tasks. Bern Open Publishing 2017-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7141090/ /pubmed/33828666 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.10.4.6 Text en This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eraslan, Sukru
Yesilada, Yeliz
Harper, Simon
Less Users More Confidence: How AOIs Don't Affect Scanpath Trend Analysis
title Less Users More Confidence: How AOIs Don't Affect Scanpath Trend Analysis
title_full Less Users More Confidence: How AOIs Don't Affect Scanpath Trend Analysis
title_fullStr Less Users More Confidence: How AOIs Don't Affect Scanpath Trend Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Less Users More Confidence: How AOIs Don't Affect Scanpath Trend Analysis
title_short Less Users More Confidence: How AOIs Don't Affect Scanpath Trend Analysis
title_sort less users more confidence: how aois don't affect scanpath trend analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33828666
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.10.4.6
work_keys_str_mv AT eraslansukru lessusersmoreconfidencehowaoisdontaffectscanpathtrendanalysis
AT yesiladayeliz lessusersmoreconfidencehowaoisdontaffectscanpathtrendanalysis
AT harpersimon lessusersmoreconfidencehowaoisdontaffectscanpathtrendanalysis