Cargando…

Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals

The use of patient-specific implants (PSIs) in craniofacial surgery is often limited due to a lack of expertise and/or production costs. Therefore, a simple and cost-efficient template-based fabrication workflow has been developed to overcome these disadvantages. The aim of this study is to assess t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chamo, Dave, Msallem, Bilal, Sharma, Neha, Aghlmandi, Soheila, Kunz, Christoph, Thieringer, Florian M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204321
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030832
_version_ 1783519140622893056
author Chamo, Dave
Msallem, Bilal
Sharma, Neha
Aghlmandi, Soheila
Kunz, Christoph
Thieringer, Florian M.
author_facet Chamo, Dave
Msallem, Bilal
Sharma, Neha
Aghlmandi, Soheila
Kunz, Christoph
Thieringer, Florian M.
author_sort Chamo, Dave
collection PubMed
description The use of patient-specific implants (PSIs) in craniofacial surgery is often limited due to a lack of expertise and/or production costs. Therefore, a simple and cost-efficient template-based fabrication workflow has been developed to overcome these disadvantages. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of PSIs made from their original templates. For a representative cranial defect (CRD) and a temporo-orbital defect (TOD), ten PSIs were made from polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) using computer-aided design (CAD) and three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. These customized implants were measured and compared with their original 3D printed templates. The implants for the CRD revealed a root mean square (RMS) value ranging from 1.128 to 0.469 mm with a median RMS (Q1 to Q3) of 0.574 (0.528 to 0.701) mm. Those for the TOD revealed an RMS value ranging from 1.079 to 0.630 mm with a median RMS (Q1 to Q3) of 0.843 (0.635 to 0.943) mm. This study demonstrates that a highly precise duplication of PSIs can be achieved using this template-molding workflow. Thus, virtually planned implants can be accurately transferred into haptic PSIs. This workflow appears to offer a sophisticated solution for craniofacial reconstruction and continues to prove itself in daily clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7141183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71411832020-04-10 Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals Chamo, Dave Msallem, Bilal Sharma, Neha Aghlmandi, Soheila Kunz, Christoph Thieringer, Florian M. J Clin Med Article The use of patient-specific implants (PSIs) in craniofacial surgery is often limited due to a lack of expertise and/or production costs. Therefore, a simple and cost-efficient template-based fabrication workflow has been developed to overcome these disadvantages. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of PSIs made from their original templates. For a representative cranial defect (CRD) and a temporo-orbital defect (TOD), ten PSIs were made from polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) using computer-aided design (CAD) and three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. These customized implants were measured and compared with their original 3D printed templates. The implants for the CRD revealed a root mean square (RMS) value ranging from 1.128 to 0.469 mm with a median RMS (Q1 to Q3) of 0.574 (0.528 to 0.701) mm. Those for the TOD revealed an RMS value ranging from 1.079 to 0.630 mm with a median RMS (Q1 to Q3) of 0.843 (0.635 to 0.943) mm. This study demonstrates that a highly precise duplication of PSIs can be achieved using this template-molding workflow. Thus, virtually planned implants can be accurately transferred into haptic PSIs. This workflow appears to offer a sophisticated solution for craniofacial reconstruction and continues to prove itself in daily clinical practice. MDPI 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7141183/ /pubmed/32204321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030832 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chamo, Dave
Msallem, Bilal
Sharma, Neha
Aghlmandi, Soheila
Kunz, Christoph
Thieringer, Florian M.
Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals
title Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals
title_full Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals
title_fullStr Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals
title_short Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals
title_sort accuracy assessment of molded, patient-specific polymethylmethacrylate craniofacial implants compared to their 3d printed originals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204321
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030832
work_keys_str_mv AT chamodave accuracyassessmentofmoldedpatientspecificpolymethylmethacrylatecraniofacialimplantscomparedtotheir3dprintedoriginals
AT msallembilal accuracyassessmentofmoldedpatientspecificpolymethylmethacrylatecraniofacialimplantscomparedtotheir3dprintedoriginals
AT sharmaneha accuracyassessmentofmoldedpatientspecificpolymethylmethacrylatecraniofacialimplantscomparedtotheir3dprintedoriginals
AT aghlmandisoheila accuracyassessmentofmoldedpatientspecificpolymethylmethacrylatecraniofacialimplantscomparedtotheir3dprintedoriginals
AT kunzchristoph accuracyassessmentofmoldedpatientspecificpolymethylmethacrylatecraniofacialimplantscomparedtotheir3dprintedoriginals
AT thieringerflorianm accuracyassessmentofmoldedpatientspecificpolymethylmethacrylatecraniofacialimplantscomparedtotheir3dprintedoriginals