Cargando…
Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals
The use of patient-specific implants (PSIs) in craniofacial surgery is often limited due to a lack of expertise and/or production costs. Therefore, a simple and cost-efficient template-based fabrication workflow has been developed to overcome these disadvantages. The aim of this study is to assess t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030832 |
_version_ | 1783519140622893056 |
---|---|
author | Chamo, Dave Msallem, Bilal Sharma, Neha Aghlmandi, Soheila Kunz, Christoph Thieringer, Florian M. |
author_facet | Chamo, Dave Msallem, Bilal Sharma, Neha Aghlmandi, Soheila Kunz, Christoph Thieringer, Florian M. |
author_sort | Chamo, Dave |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of patient-specific implants (PSIs) in craniofacial surgery is often limited due to a lack of expertise and/or production costs. Therefore, a simple and cost-efficient template-based fabrication workflow has been developed to overcome these disadvantages. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of PSIs made from their original templates. For a representative cranial defect (CRD) and a temporo-orbital defect (TOD), ten PSIs were made from polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) using computer-aided design (CAD) and three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. These customized implants were measured and compared with their original 3D printed templates. The implants for the CRD revealed a root mean square (RMS) value ranging from 1.128 to 0.469 mm with a median RMS (Q1 to Q3) of 0.574 (0.528 to 0.701) mm. Those for the TOD revealed an RMS value ranging from 1.079 to 0.630 mm with a median RMS (Q1 to Q3) of 0.843 (0.635 to 0.943) mm. This study demonstrates that a highly precise duplication of PSIs can be achieved using this template-molding workflow. Thus, virtually planned implants can be accurately transferred into haptic PSIs. This workflow appears to offer a sophisticated solution for craniofacial reconstruction and continues to prove itself in daily clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7141183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71411832020-04-10 Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals Chamo, Dave Msallem, Bilal Sharma, Neha Aghlmandi, Soheila Kunz, Christoph Thieringer, Florian M. J Clin Med Article The use of patient-specific implants (PSIs) in craniofacial surgery is often limited due to a lack of expertise and/or production costs. Therefore, a simple and cost-efficient template-based fabrication workflow has been developed to overcome these disadvantages. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of PSIs made from their original templates. For a representative cranial defect (CRD) and a temporo-orbital defect (TOD), ten PSIs were made from polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) using computer-aided design (CAD) and three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. These customized implants were measured and compared with their original 3D printed templates. The implants for the CRD revealed a root mean square (RMS) value ranging from 1.128 to 0.469 mm with a median RMS (Q1 to Q3) of 0.574 (0.528 to 0.701) mm. Those for the TOD revealed an RMS value ranging from 1.079 to 0.630 mm with a median RMS (Q1 to Q3) of 0.843 (0.635 to 0.943) mm. This study demonstrates that a highly precise duplication of PSIs can be achieved using this template-molding workflow. Thus, virtually planned implants can be accurately transferred into haptic PSIs. This workflow appears to offer a sophisticated solution for craniofacial reconstruction and continues to prove itself in daily clinical practice. MDPI 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7141183/ /pubmed/32204321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030832 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chamo, Dave Msallem, Bilal Sharma, Neha Aghlmandi, Soheila Kunz, Christoph Thieringer, Florian M. Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals |
title | Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals |
title_full | Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals |
title_fullStr | Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals |
title_short | Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals |
title_sort | accuracy assessment of molded, patient-specific polymethylmethacrylate craniofacial implants compared to their 3d printed originals |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030832 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chamodave accuracyassessmentofmoldedpatientspecificpolymethylmethacrylatecraniofacialimplantscomparedtotheir3dprintedoriginals AT msallembilal accuracyassessmentofmoldedpatientspecificpolymethylmethacrylatecraniofacialimplantscomparedtotheir3dprintedoriginals AT sharmaneha accuracyassessmentofmoldedpatientspecificpolymethylmethacrylatecraniofacialimplantscomparedtotheir3dprintedoriginals AT aghlmandisoheila accuracyassessmentofmoldedpatientspecificpolymethylmethacrylatecraniofacialimplantscomparedtotheir3dprintedoriginals AT kunzchristoph accuracyassessmentofmoldedpatientspecificpolymethylmethacrylatecraniofacialimplantscomparedtotheir3dprintedoriginals AT thieringerflorianm accuracyassessmentofmoldedpatientspecificpolymethylmethacrylatecraniofacialimplantscomparedtotheir3dprintedoriginals |