Cargando…

Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology

With the rapid progression of additive manufacturing and the emergence of new 3D printing technologies, accuracy assessment is mostly being performed on isosymmetric-shaped test bodies. However, the accuracy of anatomic models can vary. The dimensional accuracy of root mean square values in terms of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Msallem, Bilal, Sharma, Neha, Cao, Shuaishuai, Halbeisen, Florian S., Zeilhofer, Hans-Florian, Thieringer, Florian M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32192099
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030817
_version_ 1783519147147132928
author Msallem, Bilal
Sharma, Neha
Cao, Shuaishuai
Halbeisen, Florian S.
Zeilhofer, Hans-Florian
Thieringer, Florian M.
author_facet Msallem, Bilal
Sharma, Neha
Cao, Shuaishuai
Halbeisen, Florian S.
Zeilhofer, Hans-Florian
Thieringer, Florian M.
author_sort Msallem, Bilal
collection PubMed
description With the rapid progression of additive manufacturing and the emergence of new 3D printing technologies, accuracy assessment is mostly being performed on isosymmetric-shaped test bodies. However, the accuracy of anatomic models can vary. The dimensional accuracy of root mean square values in terms of trueness and precision of 50 mandibular replicas, printed with five common printing technologies, were evaluated. The highest trueness was found for the selective laser sintering printer (0.11 ± 0.016 mm), followed by a binder jetting printer (0.14 ± 0.02 mm), and a fused filament fabrication printer (0.16 ± 0.009 mm). However, highest precision was identified for the fused filament fabrication printer (0.05 ± 0.005 mm) whereas other printers had marginally lower values. Despite the statistically significance (p < 0.001), these differences can be considered clinically insignificant. These findings demonstrate that all 3D printing technologies create models with satisfactory dimensional accuracy for surgical use. Since satisfactory results in terms of accuracy can be reached with most technologies, the choice should be more strongly based on the printing materials, the intended use, and the overall budget. The simplest printing technology (fused filament fabrication) always scored high and thus is a reliable choice for most purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7141211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71412112020-04-10 Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology Msallem, Bilal Sharma, Neha Cao, Shuaishuai Halbeisen, Florian S. Zeilhofer, Hans-Florian Thieringer, Florian M. J Clin Med Article With the rapid progression of additive manufacturing and the emergence of new 3D printing technologies, accuracy assessment is mostly being performed on isosymmetric-shaped test bodies. However, the accuracy of anatomic models can vary. The dimensional accuracy of root mean square values in terms of trueness and precision of 50 mandibular replicas, printed with five common printing technologies, were evaluated. The highest trueness was found for the selective laser sintering printer (0.11 ± 0.016 mm), followed by a binder jetting printer (0.14 ± 0.02 mm), and a fused filament fabrication printer (0.16 ± 0.009 mm). However, highest precision was identified for the fused filament fabrication printer (0.05 ± 0.005 mm) whereas other printers had marginally lower values. Despite the statistically significance (p < 0.001), these differences can be considered clinically insignificant. These findings demonstrate that all 3D printing technologies create models with satisfactory dimensional accuracy for surgical use. Since satisfactory results in terms of accuracy can be reached with most technologies, the choice should be more strongly based on the printing materials, the intended use, and the overall budget. The simplest printing technology (fused filament fabrication) always scored high and thus is a reliable choice for most purposes. MDPI 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7141211/ /pubmed/32192099 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030817 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Msallem, Bilal
Sharma, Neha
Cao, Shuaishuai
Halbeisen, Florian S.
Zeilhofer, Hans-Florian
Thieringer, Florian M.
Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology
title Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology
title_full Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology
title_short Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology
title_sort evaluation of the dimensional accuracy of 3d-printed anatomical mandibular models using fff, sla, sls, mj, and bj printing technology
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32192099
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030817
work_keys_str_mv AT msallembilal evaluationofthedimensionalaccuracyof3dprintedanatomicalmandibularmodelsusingfffslaslsmjandbjprintingtechnology
AT sharmaneha evaluationofthedimensionalaccuracyof3dprintedanatomicalmandibularmodelsusingfffslaslsmjandbjprintingtechnology
AT caoshuaishuai evaluationofthedimensionalaccuracyof3dprintedanatomicalmandibularmodelsusingfffslaslsmjandbjprintingtechnology
AT halbeisenflorians evaluationofthedimensionalaccuracyof3dprintedanatomicalmandibularmodelsusingfffslaslsmjandbjprintingtechnology
AT zeilhoferhansflorian evaluationofthedimensionalaccuracyof3dprintedanatomicalmandibularmodelsusingfffslaslsmjandbjprintingtechnology
AT thieringerflorianm evaluationofthedimensionalaccuracyof3dprintedanatomicalmandibularmodelsusingfffslaslsmjandbjprintingtechnology