Cargando…

Additional Value of Machine-Learning Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve Compared to Standard Computed Tomographic Angiography

Background: Machine-learning-based computed-tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR(ML)) obtains a hemodynamic index in coronary arteries. We examined whether it could reduce the number of invasive coronary angiographies (ICA) showing no obstructive lesions. We further compared CT-FFR(ML)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lossnitzer, Dirk, Chandra, Leonard, Rutsch, Marlon, Becher, Tobias, Overhoff, Daniel, Janssen, Sonja, Weiss, Christel, Borggrefe, Martin, Akin, Ibrahim, Pfleger, Stefan, Baumann, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32138259
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030676
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Machine-learning-based computed-tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR(ML)) obtains a hemodynamic index in coronary arteries. We examined whether it could reduce the number of invasive coronary angiographies (ICA) showing no obstructive lesions. We further compared CT-FFR(ML)-derived measurements to clinical and CT-derived scores. Methods: We retrospectively selected 88 patients (63 ± 11years, 74% male) with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) who underwent clinically indicated coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) and ICA. cCTA image data were processed with an on-site prototype CT-FFR(ML) software. Results: CT-FFR(ML) revealed an index of >0.80 in coronary vessels of 48 (55%) patients. This finding was corroborated in 45 (94%) patients by ICA, yet three (6%) received revascularization. In patients with an index ≤ 0.80, three (8%) of 40 were identified as false positive. A total of 48 (55%) patients could have been retained from ICA. CT-FFR(ML) (AUC = 0.96, p ≤ 0.0001) demonstrated a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the pretest probability or CT-derived scores and showed an excellent sensitivity (93%), specificity (94%), positive predictive value (PPV; 93%) and negative predictive value (NPV; 94%). Conclusion: CT-FFR(ML) could be beneficial for clinical practice, as it may identify patients with CAD without hemodynamical significant stenosis, and may thus reduce the rate of ICA without necessity for coronary intervention.