Cargando…
Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the success rate of root canal treatments undertaken using a calcium silicate root canal sealer in combination with a single cone with non-calcium silicate cement and warm vertical condensation. Methods: 150 necrotic or pulpitic teeth were treated. (R...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183124 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030782 |
_version_ | 1783519173255626752 |
---|---|
author | Zavattini, Angelo Knight, Alan Foschi, Federico Mannocci, Francesco |
author_facet | Zavattini, Angelo Knight, Alan Foschi, Federico Mannocci, Francesco |
author_sort | Zavattini, Angelo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The aim of this study was to compare the success rate of root canal treatments undertaken using a calcium silicate root canal sealer in combination with a single cone with non-calcium silicate cement and warm vertical condensation. Methods: 150 necrotic or pulpitic teeth were treated. (REC: 08/H0804/79). Following standardized root canal chemo-debridement. The canals were obturated using warm vertical condensation of gutta-percha and epoxy-based sealer (AH plus) or a calcium silicate sealer (BioRoot(TM) RCS) with a single cone technique. Follow-up assessment was conducted at 12 months using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Results: At 1-year recall, 104 teeth were assessed (51 AH plus, 53 BioRoot(TM) RCS). The success rate using loose criteria for the CBCT images and PA radiographs was respectively 80% and 89% in the AH plus/warm vertical condensation group, 84% and 90% in the BioRoot(TM) RCS/single cone group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Fisher exact test p value 0.6099 for the CBCT images). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this non-randomized trial, a calcium silicate cement in combination with single cone resulted in a similar proportion of successful cases compared to warm vertical condensation and epoxy-based sealer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7141324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71413242020-04-10 Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial Zavattini, Angelo Knight, Alan Foschi, Federico Mannocci, Francesco J Clin Med Article Background: The aim of this study was to compare the success rate of root canal treatments undertaken using a calcium silicate root canal sealer in combination with a single cone with non-calcium silicate cement and warm vertical condensation. Methods: 150 necrotic or pulpitic teeth were treated. (REC: 08/H0804/79). Following standardized root canal chemo-debridement. The canals were obturated using warm vertical condensation of gutta-percha and epoxy-based sealer (AH plus) or a calcium silicate sealer (BioRoot(TM) RCS) with a single cone technique. Follow-up assessment was conducted at 12 months using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Results: At 1-year recall, 104 teeth were assessed (51 AH plus, 53 BioRoot(TM) RCS). The success rate using loose criteria for the CBCT images and PA radiographs was respectively 80% and 89% in the AH plus/warm vertical condensation group, 84% and 90% in the BioRoot(TM) RCS/single cone group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Fisher exact test p value 0.6099 for the CBCT images). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this non-randomized trial, a calcium silicate cement in combination with single cone resulted in a similar proportion of successful cases compared to warm vertical condensation and epoxy-based sealer. MDPI 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7141324/ /pubmed/32183124 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030782 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zavattini, Angelo Knight, Alan Foschi, Federico Mannocci, Francesco Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | outcome of root canal treatments using a new calcium silicate root canal sealer: a non-randomized clinical trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183124 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030782 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zavattiniangelo outcomeofrootcanaltreatmentsusinganewcalciumsilicaterootcanalsealeranonrandomizedclinicaltrial AT knightalan outcomeofrootcanaltreatmentsusinganewcalciumsilicaterootcanalsealeranonrandomizedclinicaltrial AT foschifederico outcomeofrootcanaltreatmentsusinganewcalciumsilicaterootcanalsealeranonrandomizedclinicaltrial AT mannoccifrancesco outcomeofrootcanaltreatmentsusinganewcalciumsilicaterootcanalsealeranonrandomizedclinicaltrial |