Cargando…

Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the success rate of root canal treatments undertaken using a calcium silicate root canal sealer in combination with a single cone with non-calcium silicate cement and warm vertical condensation. Methods: 150 necrotic or pulpitic teeth were treated. (R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zavattini, Angelo, Knight, Alan, Foschi, Federico, Mannocci, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183124
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030782
_version_ 1783519173255626752
author Zavattini, Angelo
Knight, Alan
Foschi, Federico
Mannocci, Francesco
author_facet Zavattini, Angelo
Knight, Alan
Foschi, Federico
Mannocci, Francesco
author_sort Zavattini, Angelo
collection PubMed
description Background: The aim of this study was to compare the success rate of root canal treatments undertaken using a calcium silicate root canal sealer in combination with a single cone with non-calcium silicate cement and warm vertical condensation. Methods: 150 necrotic or pulpitic teeth were treated. (REC: 08/H0804/79). Following standardized root canal chemo-debridement. The canals were obturated using warm vertical condensation of gutta-percha and epoxy-based sealer (AH plus) or a calcium silicate sealer (BioRoot(TM) RCS) with a single cone technique. Follow-up assessment was conducted at 12 months using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Results: At 1-year recall, 104 teeth were assessed (51 AH plus, 53 BioRoot(TM) RCS). The success rate using loose criteria for the CBCT images and PA radiographs was respectively 80% and 89% in the AH plus/warm vertical condensation group, 84% and 90% in the BioRoot(TM) RCS/single cone group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Fisher exact test p value 0.6099 for the CBCT images). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this non-randomized trial, a calcium silicate cement in combination with single cone resulted in a similar proportion of successful cases compared to warm vertical condensation and epoxy-based sealer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7141324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71413242020-04-10 Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial Zavattini, Angelo Knight, Alan Foschi, Federico Mannocci, Francesco J Clin Med Article Background: The aim of this study was to compare the success rate of root canal treatments undertaken using a calcium silicate root canal sealer in combination with a single cone with non-calcium silicate cement and warm vertical condensation. Methods: 150 necrotic or pulpitic teeth were treated. (REC: 08/H0804/79). Following standardized root canal chemo-debridement. The canals were obturated using warm vertical condensation of gutta-percha and epoxy-based sealer (AH plus) or a calcium silicate sealer (BioRoot(TM) RCS) with a single cone technique. Follow-up assessment was conducted at 12 months using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Results: At 1-year recall, 104 teeth were assessed (51 AH plus, 53 BioRoot(TM) RCS). The success rate using loose criteria for the CBCT images and PA radiographs was respectively 80% and 89% in the AH plus/warm vertical condensation group, 84% and 90% in the BioRoot(TM) RCS/single cone group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Fisher exact test p value 0.6099 for the CBCT images). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this non-randomized trial, a calcium silicate cement in combination with single cone resulted in a similar proportion of successful cases compared to warm vertical condensation and epoxy-based sealer. MDPI 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7141324/ /pubmed/32183124 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030782 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zavattini, Angelo
Knight, Alan
Foschi, Federico
Mannocci, Francesco
Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
title Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort outcome of root canal treatments using a new calcium silicate root canal sealer: a non-randomized clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183124
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030782
work_keys_str_mv AT zavattiniangelo outcomeofrootcanaltreatmentsusinganewcalciumsilicaterootcanalsealeranonrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT knightalan outcomeofrootcanaltreatmentsusinganewcalciumsilicaterootcanalsealeranonrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT foschifederico outcomeofrootcanaltreatmentsusinganewcalciumsilicaterootcanalsealeranonrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mannoccifrancesco outcomeofrootcanaltreatmentsusinganewcalciumsilicaterootcanalsealeranonrandomizedclinicaltrial