Cargando…
Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update
The aim of this clinical study was to update the available data in the literature regarding the transfer accuracy (trueness/precision) of four current intraoral scanners (IOS) equipped with the latest software versions and to compare these data with conventional impressions (CVI). A metallic referen...
Autores principales: | Schmidt, Alexander, Klussmann, Leona, Wöstmann, Bernd, Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32143433 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030688 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Update on the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Full-Arch Impressions of Partially Edentulous and Fully Dentate Jaws in Young and Elderly Subjects: A Clinical Trial
por: Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Elastic deformation of the mandibular jaw revisited—a clinical comparison between digital and conventional impressions using a reference
por: Schmidt, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The transfer accuracy of digital and conventional full-arch impressions influenced by fixed orthodontic appliances: a reference aid–based in vitro study
por: Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
What to Prefer in Patients with Multibracket Appliances? Digital vs. Conventional Full-Arch Impressions—A Reference Aid-Based In Vivo Study
por: Bock, Niko Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Digital versus Conventional Impression Taking Focusing on Interdental Areas: A Clinical Trial
por: Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie, et al.
Publicado: (2020)