Cargando…

Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements

Radiographic outcome assessment of ankle arthrodesis (AA) requires accurate measurement techniques. This study aimed to identify the most reliable methods for sagittal tibio-talar alignment measurements with regard to the tibio-talar offset after AA. Lateral weight-bearing radiographs of 38 fused an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schieder, Sophie, Nemecek, Elena, Schuh, Reinhard, Kolb, Alexander, Windhager, Reinhard, Willegger, Madeleine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32187992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030801
_version_ 1783519182892040192
author Schieder, Sophie
Nemecek, Elena
Schuh, Reinhard
Kolb, Alexander
Windhager, Reinhard
Willegger, Madeleine
author_facet Schieder, Sophie
Nemecek, Elena
Schuh, Reinhard
Kolb, Alexander
Windhager, Reinhard
Willegger, Madeleine
author_sort Schieder, Sophie
collection PubMed
description Radiographic outcome assessment of ankle arthrodesis (AA) requires accurate measurement techniques. This study aimed to identify the most reliable methods for sagittal tibio-talar alignment measurements with regard to the tibio-talar offset after AA. Lateral weight-bearing radiographs of 38 fused ankles were selected for retrospective review. The sagittal tibio-talar angle (STTA), the modified tibio-talar ratio (mT-T ratio) and the sagittal tibio-talar offset (tibCOR, procLAT) were measured by three independent observers. Intra- and interobserver correlation coefficients (ICC) and mean measurement differences were calculated to assess measurement reliability and accuracy. By defining the talar longitudinal axis as a line from the inferior aspect of the posterior tubercle of the talus to the most inferior aspect of the talar neck, STTA showed excellent (ICC 0.924; CI 95% 0.862–0.959) and mTT-ratio provided high (ICC 0.836; CI 95% 0.721–0.909) interobserver reliability, respectively. For tibio-talar offset measurement the tibCOR method showed superior reliability and better interobserver agreement compared to the procLAT technique. The STTA and a modified T-T ratio are recommended for future scientific radiographic measurements in AA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7141366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71413662020-04-10 Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements Schieder, Sophie Nemecek, Elena Schuh, Reinhard Kolb, Alexander Windhager, Reinhard Willegger, Madeleine J Clin Med Article Radiographic outcome assessment of ankle arthrodesis (AA) requires accurate measurement techniques. This study aimed to identify the most reliable methods for sagittal tibio-talar alignment measurements with regard to the tibio-talar offset after AA. Lateral weight-bearing radiographs of 38 fused ankles were selected for retrospective review. The sagittal tibio-talar angle (STTA), the modified tibio-talar ratio (mT-T ratio) and the sagittal tibio-talar offset (tibCOR, procLAT) were measured by three independent observers. Intra- and interobserver correlation coefficients (ICC) and mean measurement differences were calculated to assess measurement reliability and accuracy. By defining the talar longitudinal axis as a line from the inferior aspect of the posterior tubercle of the talus to the most inferior aspect of the talar neck, STTA showed excellent (ICC 0.924; CI 95% 0.862–0.959) and mTT-ratio provided high (ICC 0.836; CI 95% 0.721–0.909) interobserver reliability, respectively. For tibio-talar offset measurement the tibCOR method showed superior reliability and better interobserver agreement compared to the procLAT technique. The STTA and a modified T-T ratio are recommended for future scientific radiographic measurements in AA. MDPI 2020-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7141366/ /pubmed/32187992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030801 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schieder, Sophie
Nemecek, Elena
Schuh, Reinhard
Kolb, Alexander
Windhager, Reinhard
Willegger, Madeleine
Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements
title Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements
title_full Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements
title_fullStr Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements
title_short Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements
title_sort radiographic sagittal tibio-talar offset in ankle arthrodesis—accuracy and reliability of measurements
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32187992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030801
work_keys_str_mv AT schiedersophie radiographicsagittaltibiotalaroffsetinanklearthrodesisaccuracyandreliabilityofmeasurements
AT nemecekelena radiographicsagittaltibiotalaroffsetinanklearthrodesisaccuracyandreliabilityofmeasurements
AT schuhreinhard radiographicsagittaltibiotalaroffsetinanklearthrodesisaccuracyandreliabilityofmeasurements
AT kolbalexander radiographicsagittaltibiotalaroffsetinanklearthrodesisaccuracyandreliabilityofmeasurements
AT windhagerreinhard radiographicsagittaltibiotalaroffsetinanklearthrodesisaccuracyandreliabilityofmeasurements
AT willeggermadeleine radiographicsagittaltibiotalaroffsetinanklearthrodesisaccuracyandreliabilityofmeasurements