Cargando…
Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements
Radiographic outcome assessment of ankle arthrodesis (AA) requires accurate measurement techniques. This study aimed to identify the most reliable methods for sagittal tibio-talar alignment measurements with regard to the tibio-talar offset after AA. Lateral weight-bearing radiographs of 38 fused an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32187992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030801 |
_version_ | 1783519182892040192 |
---|---|
author | Schieder, Sophie Nemecek, Elena Schuh, Reinhard Kolb, Alexander Windhager, Reinhard Willegger, Madeleine |
author_facet | Schieder, Sophie Nemecek, Elena Schuh, Reinhard Kolb, Alexander Windhager, Reinhard Willegger, Madeleine |
author_sort | Schieder, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Radiographic outcome assessment of ankle arthrodesis (AA) requires accurate measurement techniques. This study aimed to identify the most reliable methods for sagittal tibio-talar alignment measurements with regard to the tibio-talar offset after AA. Lateral weight-bearing radiographs of 38 fused ankles were selected for retrospective review. The sagittal tibio-talar angle (STTA), the modified tibio-talar ratio (mT-T ratio) and the sagittal tibio-talar offset (tibCOR, procLAT) were measured by three independent observers. Intra- and interobserver correlation coefficients (ICC) and mean measurement differences were calculated to assess measurement reliability and accuracy. By defining the talar longitudinal axis as a line from the inferior aspect of the posterior tubercle of the talus to the most inferior aspect of the talar neck, STTA showed excellent (ICC 0.924; CI 95% 0.862–0.959) and mTT-ratio provided high (ICC 0.836; CI 95% 0.721–0.909) interobserver reliability, respectively. For tibio-talar offset measurement the tibCOR method showed superior reliability and better interobserver agreement compared to the procLAT technique. The STTA and a modified T-T ratio are recommended for future scientific radiographic measurements in AA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7141366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71413662020-04-10 Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements Schieder, Sophie Nemecek, Elena Schuh, Reinhard Kolb, Alexander Windhager, Reinhard Willegger, Madeleine J Clin Med Article Radiographic outcome assessment of ankle arthrodesis (AA) requires accurate measurement techniques. This study aimed to identify the most reliable methods for sagittal tibio-talar alignment measurements with regard to the tibio-talar offset after AA. Lateral weight-bearing radiographs of 38 fused ankles were selected for retrospective review. The sagittal tibio-talar angle (STTA), the modified tibio-talar ratio (mT-T ratio) and the sagittal tibio-talar offset (tibCOR, procLAT) were measured by three independent observers. Intra- and interobserver correlation coefficients (ICC) and mean measurement differences were calculated to assess measurement reliability and accuracy. By defining the talar longitudinal axis as a line from the inferior aspect of the posterior tubercle of the talus to the most inferior aspect of the talar neck, STTA showed excellent (ICC 0.924; CI 95% 0.862–0.959) and mTT-ratio provided high (ICC 0.836; CI 95% 0.721–0.909) interobserver reliability, respectively. For tibio-talar offset measurement the tibCOR method showed superior reliability and better interobserver agreement compared to the procLAT technique. The STTA and a modified T-T ratio are recommended for future scientific radiographic measurements in AA. MDPI 2020-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7141366/ /pubmed/32187992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030801 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Schieder, Sophie Nemecek, Elena Schuh, Reinhard Kolb, Alexander Windhager, Reinhard Willegger, Madeleine Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements |
title | Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements |
title_full | Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements |
title_fullStr | Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements |
title_short | Radiographic Sagittal Tibio-Talar Offset in Ankle Arthrodesis—Accuracy and Reliability of Measurements |
title_sort | radiographic sagittal tibio-talar offset in ankle arthrodesis—accuracy and reliability of measurements |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32187992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schiedersophie radiographicsagittaltibiotalaroffsetinanklearthrodesisaccuracyandreliabilityofmeasurements AT nemecekelena radiographicsagittaltibiotalaroffsetinanklearthrodesisaccuracyandreliabilityofmeasurements AT schuhreinhard radiographicsagittaltibiotalaroffsetinanklearthrodesisaccuracyandreliabilityofmeasurements AT kolbalexander radiographicsagittaltibiotalaroffsetinanklearthrodesisaccuracyandreliabilityofmeasurements AT windhagerreinhard radiographicsagittaltibiotalaroffsetinanklearthrodesisaccuracyandreliabilityofmeasurements AT willeggermadeleine radiographicsagittaltibiotalaroffsetinanklearthrodesisaccuracyandreliabilityofmeasurements |