Cargando…
The Treatment of Ingrown Nail: Chemical Matricectomy With Phenol Versus Aesthetic Reconstruction. A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
Background: In onychocryptosis surgery, incisional and non-incisional matricectomy is indicated according to the stage. The chemical matricectomy with 88% phenol solution is the gold standard and a wedge resection is indicated for more advanced stages. The aesthetic reconstruction has the advantages...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030845 |
_version_ | 1783519212742901760 |
---|---|
author | Muriel-Sánchez, Juan Manuel Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, Ricardo Montaño-Jiménez, Pedro Coheña-Jiménez, Manuel |
author_facet | Muriel-Sánchez, Juan Manuel Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, Ricardo Montaño-Jiménez, Pedro Coheña-Jiménez, Manuel |
author_sort | Muriel-Sánchez, Juan Manuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In onychocryptosis surgery, incisional and non-incisional matricectomy is indicated according to the stage. The chemical matricectomy with 88% phenol solution is the gold standard and a wedge resection is indicated for more advanced stages. The aesthetic reconstruction has the advantages of the incisional procedure without eponychium incisions and an effectiveness similar to the chemical matricectomy with phenol. Objective: To compare the recurrence and the healing time between the chemical matricectomy with phenol and the aesthetic reconstruction. Methods: A comparative, prospective, parallel, randomized, and one-blinded clinical trial was registered with the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) with identification number 2019-001294-80. Thrity-four patients (56 feet) with 112 onychocryptosis were randomized in two groups. Thirty-six were treated with chemical matricectomy with phenol and 76 with aesthetic reconstruction. Each patient was blind to the surgical procedure assigned by the investigator. The primary outcome measurements were healing time and recurrence. The secondary outcome measurements were post-surgical bleeding, pain, inflammation, and infection rate. Results: The aesthetic reconstruction procedure presents a shorter healing time (8.2 ± 1.4 days vs. 21.3 ± 3.1 days; p < 0.001) with a similar recurrence rate (p = 0.98). Post-operatory bleeding, pain, inflammation, and the infection rate did not show significant differences (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The aesthetic reconstruction presents a shorter healing time, favoring the patients’ recuperation, with a recurrence similar to the chemical matricectomy with 88% phenol solution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7141528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71415282020-04-15 The Treatment of Ingrown Nail: Chemical Matricectomy With Phenol Versus Aesthetic Reconstruction. A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial Muriel-Sánchez, Juan Manuel Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, Ricardo Montaño-Jiménez, Pedro Coheña-Jiménez, Manuel J Clin Med Article Background: In onychocryptosis surgery, incisional and non-incisional matricectomy is indicated according to the stage. The chemical matricectomy with 88% phenol solution is the gold standard and a wedge resection is indicated for more advanced stages. The aesthetic reconstruction has the advantages of the incisional procedure without eponychium incisions and an effectiveness similar to the chemical matricectomy with phenol. Objective: To compare the recurrence and the healing time between the chemical matricectomy with phenol and the aesthetic reconstruction. Methods: A comparative, prospective, parallel, randomized, and one-blinded clinical trial was registered with the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) with identification number 2019-001294-80. Thrity-four patients (56 feet) with 112 onychocryptosis were randomized in two groups. Thirty-six were treated with chemical matricectomy with phenol and 76 with aesthetic reconstruction. Each patient was blind to the surgical procedure assigned by the investigator. The primary outcome measurements were healing time and recurrence. The secondary outcome measurements were post-surgical bleeding, pain, inflammation, and infection rate. Results: The aesthetic reconstruction procedure presents a shorter healing time (8.2 ± 1.4 days vs. 21.3 ± 3.1 days; p < 0.001) with a similar recurrence rate (p = 0.98). Post-operatory bleeding, pain, inflammation, and the infection rate did not show significant differences (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The aesthetic reconstruction presents a shorter healing time, favoring the patients’ recuperation, with a recurrence similar to the chemical matricectomy with 88% phenol solution. MDPI 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7141528/ /pubmed/32244966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030845 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Muriel-Sánchez, Juan Manuel Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, Ricardo Montaño-Jiménez, Pedro Coheña-Jiménez, Manuel The Treatment of Ingrown Nail: Chemical Matricectomy With Phenol Versus Aesthetic Reconstruction. A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | The Treatment of Ingrown Nail: Chemical Matricectomy With Phenol Versus Aesthetic Reconstruction. A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | The Treatment of Ingrown Nail: Chemical Matricectomy With Phenol Versus Aesthetic Reconstruction. A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | The Treatment of Ingrown Nail: Chemical Matricectomy With Phenol Versus Aesthetic Reconstruction. A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Treatment of Ingrown Nail: Chemical Matricectomy With Phenol Versus Aesthetic Reconstruction. A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | The Treatment of Ingrown Nail: Chemical Matricectomy With Phenol Versus Aesthetic Reconstruction. A Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | treatment of ingrown nail: chemical matricectomy with phenol versus aesthetic reconstruction. a single blinded randomized clinical trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7141528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030845 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murielsanchezjuanmanuel thetreatmentofingrownnailchemicalmatricectomywithphenolversusaestheticreconstructionasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial AT becerrodebengoavallejoricardo thetreatmentofingrownnailchemicalmatricectomywithphenolversusaestheticreconstructionasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial AT montanojimenezpedro thetreatmentofingrownnailchemicalmatricectomywithphenolversusaestheticreconstructionasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial AT cohenajimenezmanuel thetreatmentofingrownnailchemicalmatricectomywithphenolversusaestheticreconstructionasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial AT murielsanchezjuanmanuel treatmentofingrownnailchemicalmatricectomywithphenolversusaestheticreconstructionasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial AT becerrodebengoavallejoricardo treatmentofingrownnailchemicalmatricectomywithphenolversusaestheticreconstructionasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial AT montanojimenezpedro treatmentofingrownnailchemicalmatricectomywithphenolversusaestheticreconstructionasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial AT cohenajimenezmanuel treatmentofingrownnailchemicalmatricectomywithphenolversusaestheticreconstructionasingleblindedrandomizedclinicaltrial |