Cargando…

The Results of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 with respect to Different Greater Trochanteric Entry Points

BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral nail antirotation-2 (PFNA-2) has been widely used to treat intertrochanteric fractures with varied outcomes in the previous studies. The entry point of the nail plays an important role in achieving acceptable reduction, stable fixation, and avoiding implant related compl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mallya, Sharan, Kamath, Surendra U., Annappa, Rajendra, Nazareth, Nithin Elliot, Kamath, Krithika, Tyagi, Pragya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2834816
_version_ 1783519360095092736
author Mallya, Sharan
Kamath, Surendra U.
Annappa, Rajendra
Nazareth, Nithin Elliot
Kamath, Krithika
Tyagi, Pragya
author_facet Mallya, Sharan
Kamath, Surendra U.
Annappa, Rajendra
Nazareth, Nithin Elliot
Kamath, Krithika
Tyagi, Pragya
author_sort Mallya, Sharan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral nail antirotation-2 (PFNA-2) has been widely used to treat intertrochanteric fractures with varied outcomes in the previous studies. The entry point of the nail plays an important role in achieving acceptable reduction, stable fixation, and avoiding implant related complications. This study was proposed to determine the optimal greater trochanteric entry point for PFNA-2 in unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures. METHODS: We conducted an observational study on 40 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture treated with PFNA-2 implant in a tertiary care hospital. The patients were grouped into two based on the entry point: group L for lateral and group M for medial entry. Randomization was carried out by assigning the patients to the group by alternate allocation. The quality of reduction, tip apex distance, Cleveland index, and all the complications were noted. The final follow-up was conducted at six months. The functional outcome was evaluated using modified Harris hip score. The data analysis was performed using Student's t-test, chi square test, and Mann–Whitney test. A P value below 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Forty patients with 20 patients treated with medial entry point were included in group M and 20 patients in group L with lateral entry point. The group L had an average tip apex distance of 20.53 and group M had 20.02 (P=0.8). The complication of screw back out was seen in 3 out of 4 patients with poor reduction in group L. As per the Cleveland index, 6 patients in each group had suboptimal position and 4 out of 6 patients in group L with suboptimal position had screw back out. The lateral cortex impingement was seen in 14 patients of group L and 6 patients in group M with significant comparison (P=0.01). Three patients in group L had varus collapse with screw back out. Also, none in group M (0.05). The average modified Harris hip score in group L at six months follow-up was 71.94 and 76.8 in group M (P=0.84). CONCLUSION: Overall, to achieve good quality of fixation and reducing damage to gluteus medius entry point for PFNA-2 should be 5 mm medial to the greater trochanter tip.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7142344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71423442020-04-10 The Results of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 with respect to Different Greater Trochanteric Entry Points Mallya, Sharan Kamath, Surendra U. Annappa, Rajendra Nazareth, Nithin Elliot Kamath, Krithika Tyagi, Pragya Adv Orthop Research Article BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral nail antirotation-2 (PFNA-2) has been widely used to treat intertrochanteric fractures with varied outcomes in the previous studies. The entry point of the nail plays an important role in achieving acceptable reduction, stable fixation, and avoiding implant related complications. This study was proposed to determine the optimal greater trochanteric entry point for PFNA-2 in unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures. METHODS: We conducted an observational study on 40 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture treated with PFNA-2 implant in a tertiary care hospital. The patients were grouped into two based on the entry point: group L for lateral and group M for medial entry. Randomization was carried out by assigning the patients to the group by alternate allocation. The quality of reduction, tip apex distance, Cleveland index, and all the complications were noted. The final follow-up was conducted at six months. The functional outcome was evaluated using modified Harris hip score. The data analysis was performed using Student's t-test, chi square test, and Mann–Whitney test. A P value below 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Forty patients with 20 patients treated with medial entry point were included in group M and 20 patients in group L with lateral entry point. The group L had an average tip apex distance of 20.53 and group M had 20.02 (P=0.8). The complication of screw back out was seen in 3 out of 4 patients with poor reduction in group L. As per the Cleveland index, 6 patients in each group had suboptimal position and 4 out of 6 patients in group L with suboptimal position had screw back out. The lateral cortex impingement was seen in 14 patients of group L and 6 patients in group M with significant comparison (P=0.01). Three patients in group L had varus collapse with screw back out. Also, none in group M (0.05). The average modified Harris hip score in group L at six months follow-up was 71.94 and 76.8 in group M (P=0.84). CONCLUSION: Overall, to achieve good quality of fixation and reducing damage to gluteus medius entry point for PFNA-2 should be 5 mm medial to the greater trochanter tip. Hindawi 2020-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7142344/ /pubmed/32280544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2834816 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sharan Mallya et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mallya, Sharan
Kamath, Surendra U.
Annappa, Rajendra
Nazareth, Nithin Elliot
Kamath, Krithika
Tyagi, Pragya
The Results of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 with respect to Different Greater Trochanteric Entry Points
title The Results of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 with respect to Different Greater Trochanteric Entry Points
title_full The Results of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 with respect to Different Greater Trochanteric Entry Points
title_fullStr The Results of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 with respect to Different Greater Trochanteric Entry Points
title_full_unstemmed The Results of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 with respect to Different Greater Trochanteric Entry Points
title_short The Results of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 with respect to Different Greater Trochanteric Entry Points
title_sort results of unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation-2 with respect to different greater trochanteric entry points
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2834816
work_keys_str_mv AT mallyasharan theresultsofunstableintertrochantericfemurfracturetreatedwithproximalfemoralnailantirotation2withrespecttodifferentgreatertrochantericentrypoints
AT kamathsurendrau theresultsofunstableintertrochantericfemurfracturetreatedwithproximalfemoralnailantirotation2withrespecttodifferentgreatertrochantericentrypoints
AT annapparajendra theresultsofunstableintertrochantericfemurfracturetreatedwithproximalfemoralnailantirotation2withrespecttodifferentgreatertrochantericentrypoints
AT nazarethnithinelliot theresultsofunstableintertrochantericfemurfracturetreatedwithproximalfemoralnailantirotation2withrespecttodifferentgreatertrochantericentrypoints
AT kamathkrithika theresultsofunstableintertrochantericfemurfracturetreatedwithproximalfemoralnailantirotation2withrespecttodifferentgreatertrochantericentrypoints
AT tyagipragya theresultsofunstableintertrochantericfemurfracturetreatedwithproximalfemoralnailantirotation2withrespecttodifferentgreatertrochantericentrypoints
AT mallyasharan resultsofunstableintertrochantericfemurfracturetreatedwithproximalfemoralnailantirotation2withrespecttodifferentgreatertrochantericentrypoints
AT kamathsurendrau resultsofunstableintertrochantericfemurfracturetreatedwithproximalfemoralnailantirotation2withrespecttodifferentgreatertrochantericentrypoints
AT annapparajendra resultsofunstableintertrochantericfemurfracturetreatedwithproximalfemoralnailantirotation2withrespecttodifferentgreatertrochantericentrypoints
AT nazarethnithinelliot resultsofunstableintertrochantericfemurfracturetreatedwithproximalfemoralnailantirotation2withrespecttodifferentgreatertrochantericentrypoints
AT kamathkrithika resultsofunstableintertrochantericfemurfracturetreatedwithproximalfemoralnailantirotation2withrespecttodifferentgreatertrochantericentrypoints
AT tyagipragya resultsofunstableintertrochantericfemurfracturetreatedwithproximalfemoralnailantirotation2withrespecttodifferentgreatertrochantericentrypoints