Cargando…

Legionella Detection in Water Networks as per ISO 11731:2017: Can Different Filter Pore Sizes and Direct Placement on Culture Media Influence Laboratory Results?

Determination of Legionella concentrations in water networks is useful for predicting legionellosis risks. The standard culture technique using concentration with membranes filters is the most commonly used method for environmental surveillance of Legionella. The aim of this study was to verify whet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Giglio, Osvalda, Diella, Giusy, Trerotoli, Paolo, Consonni, Michela, Palermo, Roberta, Tesauro, Marina, Laganà, Pasqualina, Serio, Gabriella, Montagna, Maria Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32245064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062077
_version_ 1783519388764209152
author De Giglio, Osvalda
Diella, Giusy
Trerotoli, Paolo
Consonni, Michela
Palermo, Roberta
Tesauro, Marina
Laganà, Pasqualina
Serio, Gabriella
Montagna, Maria Teresa
author_facet De Giglio, Osvalda
Diella, Giusy
Trerotoli, Paolo
Consonni, Michela
Palermo, Roberta
Tesauro, Marina
Laganà, Pasqualina
Serio, Gabriella
Montagna, Maria Teresa
author_sort De Giglio, Osvalda
collection PubMed
description Determination of Legionella concentrations in water networks is useful for predicting legionellosis risks. The standard culture technique using concentration with membranes filters is the most commonly used method for environmental surveillance of Legionella. The aim of this study was to verify whether filtration with different filter pore sizes (0.2 and 0.45 µm) according to (ISO) 11731:2017, followed by directly placing them on culture media, can influence Legionella detection. Three laboratories participated in an experimental study that tested a known suspension of Legionella pneumophila (Lpn) serogroup 1 (ATCC 33152) (approximate final cell density of 15 CFU/mL). E. coli (ATCC 11775) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 25668) were included as control tests. The average (95% CI) percentage of recovery of Lpn was 65% using 0.45-µm filters and 15% using 0.2-µm filters (p < 0.0001). For control tests, the average (95% CI) percentage of recovery was higher with 0.45 vs. 0.2 µm filters: 97% vs. 64% for Escherichia coli (p < 0.00001) and 105% vs. 97% (p = 0.0244) for P. aeruginosa. Our results showed that the 0.45-µm filters provided the greatest detection of Legionella. Because the current national guidelines leave the choice of membrane porosity to the operator, experimental studies are important for directing operators towards a conscious choice to standardize Legionella environmental surveillance methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7142469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71424692020-04-15 Legionella Detection in Water Networks as per ISO 11731:2017: Can Different Filter Pore Sizes and Direct Placement on Culture Media Influence Laboratory Results? De Giglio, Osvalda Diella, Giusy Trerotoli, Paolo Consonni, Michela Palermo, Roberta Tesauro, Marina Laganà, Pasqualina Serio, Gabriella Montagna, Maria Teresa Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Determination of Legionella concentrations in water networks is useful for predicting legionellosis risks. The standard culture technique using concentration with membranes filters is the most commonly used method for environmental surveillance of Legionella. The aim of this study was to verify whether filtration with different filter pore sizes (0.2 and 0.45 µm) according to (ISO) 11731:2017, followed by directly placing them on culture media, can influence Legionella detection. Three laboratories participated in an experimental study that tested a known suspension of Legionella pneumophila (Lpn) serogroup 1 (ATCC 33152) (approximate final cell density of 15 CFU/mL). E. coli (ATCC 11775) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 25668) were included as control tests. The average (95% CI) percentage of recovery of Lpn was 65% using 0.45-µm filters and 15% using 0.2-µm filters (p < 0.0001). For control tests, the average (95% CI) percentage of recovery was higher with 0.45 vs. 0.2 µm filters: 97% vs. 64% for Escherichia coli (p < 0.00001) and 105% vs. 97% (p = 0.0244) for P. aeruginosa. Our results showed that the 0.45-µm filters provided the greatest detection of Legionella. Because the current national guidelines leave the choice of membrane porosity to the operator, experimental studies are important for directing operators towards a conscious choice to standardize Legionella environmental surveillance methods. MDPI 2020-03-20 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7142469/ /pubmed/32245064 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062077 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
De Giglio, Osvalda
Diella, Giusy
Trerotoli, Paolo
Consonni, Michela
Palermo, Roberta
Tesauro, Marina
Laganà, Pasqualina
Serio, Gabriella
Montagna, Maria Teresa
Legionella Detection in Water Networks as per ISO 11731:2017: Can Different Filter Pore Sizes and Direct Placement on Culture Media Influence Laboratory Results?
title Legionella Detection in Water Networks as per ISO 11731:2017: Can Different Filter Pore Sizes and Direct Placement on Culture Media Influence Laboratory Results?
title_full Legionella Detection in Water Networks as per ISO 11731:2017: Can Different Filter Pore Sizes and Direct Placement on Culture Media Influence Laboratory Results?
title_fullStr Legionella Detection in Water Networks as per ISO 11731:2017: Can Different Filter Pore Sizes and Direct Placement on Culture Media Influence Laboratory Results?
title_full_unstemmed Legionella Detection in Water Networks as per ISO 11731:2017: Can Different Filter Pore Sizes and Direct Placement on Culture Media Influence Laboratory Results?
title_short Legionella Detection in Water Networks as per ISO 11731:2017: Can Different Filter Pore Sizes and Direct Placement on Culture Media Influence Laboratory Results?
title_sort legionella detection in water networks as per iso 11731:2017: can different filter pore sizes and direct placement on culture media influence laboratory results?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32245064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062077
work_keys_str_mv AT degiglioosvalda legionelladetectioninwaternetworksasperiso117312017candifferentfilterporesizesanddirectplacementonculturemediainfluencelaboratoryresults
AT diellagiusy legionelladetectioninwaternetworksasperiso117312017candifferentfilterporesizesanddirectplacementonculturemediainfluencelaboratoryresults
AT trerotolipaolo legionelladetectioninwaternetworksasperiso117312017candifferentfilterporesizesanddirectplacementonculturemediainfluencelaboratoryresults
AT consonnimichela legionelladetectioninwaternetworksasperiso117312017candifferentfilterporesizesanddirectplacementonculturemediainfluencelaboratoryresults
AT palermoroberta legionelladetectioninwaternetworksasperiso117312017candifferentfilterporesizesanddirectplacementonculturemediainfluencelaboratoryresults
AT tesauromarina legionelladetectioninwaternetworksasperiso117312017candifferentfilterporesizesanddirectplacementonculturemediainfluencelaboratoryresults
AT laganapasqualina legionelladetectioninwaternetworksasperiso117312017candifferentfilterporesizesanddirectplacementonculturemediainfluencelaboratoryresults
AT seriogabriella legionelladetectioninwaternetworksasperiso117312017candifferentfilterporesizesanddirectplacementonculturemediainfluencelaboratoryresults
AT montagnamariateresa legionelladetectioninwaternetworksasperiso117312017candifferentfilterporesizesanddirectplacementonculturemediainfluencelaboratoryresults