Cargando…

Cancer and Non-Cancer Risk Concerns from Metals in Electronic Cigarette Liquids and Aerosols

We evaluated metal concentrations in e-liquids and e-aerosols from eight studies and estimated the range of corresponding cancer and non-cancer risks. Chromium and nickel were the leading contributors to cancer risk, with minor contributions from cadmium, lead, and arsenic. The increased cancer risk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fowles, Jefferson, Barreau, Tracy, Wu, Nerissa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32213824
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062146
_version_ 1783519424563642368
author Fowles, Jefferson
Barreau, Tracy
Wu, Nerissa
author_facet Fowles, Jefferson
Barreau, Tracy
Wu, Nerissa
author_sort Fowles, Jefferson
collection PubMed
description We evaluated metal concentrations in e-liquids and e-aerosols from eight studies and estimated the range of corresponding cancer and non-cancer risks. Chromium and nickel were the leading contributors to cancer risk, with minor contributions from cadmium, lead, and arsenic. The increased cancer risks, assuming exposure to 2 mL/day, ranged from 5.7 to 30,000 additional cancers in a million e-cigarette users. The average cancer risk was 3 in 1000. Cancer risks in the mid to upper end of these ranges exceed acceptable levels. The hazard quotient (HQ) approach was used to evaluate non-cancer risks. Hazard quotients exceeding 1.0 indicate the possibility for non-cancer adverse health effects. Estimated exposures at the maximum reported concentrations of nickel, chromium, and manganese resulted in HQ values of 161, 1.1, and 1.0, respectively, with additional contributions from lead. The average concentration of nickel resulted in an HQ value of 14. We conclude from these studies that exposure to metals in e-cigarette liquids and aerosols may pose a significant cancer and non-cancer health risk at the mid and upper end of the reported ranges. The device design and heating elements appear to be the main source of metals in e-aerosols. The large range of metals within and across e-cigarette brands indicate the need for improvements in product design, enforced product safety regulations and manufacturing quality control. Implementation of such measures could reduce metal exposure in e-cigarette users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7142621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71426212020-04-15 Cancer and Non-Cancer Risk Concerns from Metals in Electronic Cigarette Liquids and Aerosols Fowles, Jefferson Barreau, Tracy Wu, Nerissa Int J Environ Res Public Health Article We evaluated metal concentrations in e-liquids and e-aerosols from eight studies and estimated the range of corresponding cancer and non-cancer risks. Chromium and nickel were the leading contributors to cancer risk, with minor contributions from cadmium, lead, and arsenic. The increased cancer risks, assuming exposure to 2 mL/day, ranged from 5.7 to 30,000 additional cancers in a million e-cigarette users. The average cancer risk was 3 in 1000. Cancer risks in the mid to upper end of these ranges exceed acceptable levels. The hazard quotient (HQ) approach was used to evaluate non-cancer risks. Hazard quotients exceeding 1.0 indicate the possibility for non-cancer adverse health effects. Estimated exposures at the maximum reported concentrations of nickel, chromium, and manganese resulted in HQ values of 161, 1.1, and 1.0, respectively, with additional contributions from lead. The average concentration of nickel resulted in an HQ value of 14. We conclude from these studies that exposure to metals in e-cigarette liquids and aerosols may pose a significant cancer and non-cancer health risk at the mid and upper end of the reported ranges. The device design and heating elements appear to be the main source of metals in e-aerosols. The large range of metals within and across e-cigarette brands indicate the need for improvements in product design, enforced product safety regulations and manufacturing quality control. Implementation of such measures could reduce metal exposure in e-cigarette users. MDPI 2020-03-24 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7142621/ /pubmed/32213824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062146 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fowles, Jefferson
Barreau, Tracy
Wu, Nerissa
Cancer and Non-Cancer Risk Concerns from Metals in Electronic Cigarette Liquids and Aerosols
title Cancer and Non-Cancer Risk Concerns from Metals in Electronic Cigarette Liquids and Aerosols
title_full Cancer and Non-Cancer Risk Concerns from Metals in Electronic Cigarette Liquids and Aerosols
title_fullStr Cancer and Non-Cancer Risk Concerns from Metals in Electronic Cigarette Liquids and Aerosols
title_full_unstemmed Cancer and Non-Cancer Risk Concerns from Metals in Electronic Cigarette Liquids and Aerosols
title_short Cancer and Non-Cancer Risk Concerns from Metals in Electronic Cigarette Liquids and Aerosols
title_sort cancer and non-cancer risk concerns from metals in electronic cigarette liquids and aerosols
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32213824
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062146
work_keys_str_mv AT fowlesjefferson cancerandnoncancerriskconcernsfrommetalsinelectroniccigaretteliquidsandaerosols
AT barreautracy cancerandnoncancerriskconcernsfrommetalsinelectroniccigaretteliquidsandaerosols
AT wunerissa cancerandnoncancerriskconcernsfrommetalsinelectroniccigaretteliquidsandaerosols