Cargando…

Comparative Studies on the Polymorphism and Copy Number Variation of mtSSU rDNA in Ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora): Implications for Phylogenetic, Environmental, and Ecological Research

While nuclear small subunit ribosomal DNA (nSSU rDNA) is the most commonly-used gene marker in studying phylogeny, ecology, abundance, and biodiversity of microbial eukaryotes, mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA (mtSSU rDNA) provides an alternative. Recently, both copy number variation and se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yurui, Jiang, Yaohan, Liu, Yongqiang, Li, Yuan, Katz, Laura A., Gao, Feng, Yan, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32106521
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8030316
_version_ 1783519428792549376
author Wang, Yurui
Jiang, Yaohan
Liu, Yongqiang
Li, Yuan
Katz, Laura A.
Gao, Feng
Yan, Ying
author_facet Wang, Yurui
Jiang, Yaohan
Liu, Yongqiang
Li, Yuan
Katz, Laura A.
Gao, Feng
Yan, Ying
author_sort Wang, Yurui
collection PubMed
description While nuclear small subunit ribosomal DNA (nSSU rDNA) is the most commonly-used gene marker in studying phylogeny, ecology, abundance, and biodiversity of microbial eukaryotes, mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA (mtSSU rDNA) provides an alternative. Recently, both copy number variation and sequence variation of nSSU rDNA have been demonstrated for diverse organisms, which can contribute to misinterpretation of microbiome data. Given this, we explore patterns for mtSSU rDNA among 13 selected ciliates (representing five classes), a major component of microbial eukaryotes, estimating copy number and sequence variation and comparing to that of nSSU rDNA. Our study reveals: (1) mtSSU rDNA copy number variation is substantially lower than that for nSSU rDNA; (2) mtSSU rDNA copy number ranges from 1.0 × 10(4) to 8.1 × 10(5); (3) a most common sequence of mtSSU rDNA is also found in each cell; (4) the sequence variation of mtSSU rDNA are mainly indels in poly A/T regions, and only half of species have sequence variation, which is fewer than that for nSSU rDNA; and (5) the polymorphisms between haplotypes of mtSSU rDNA would not influence the phylogenetic topology. Together, these data provide more insights into mtSSU rDNA as a powerful marker especially for microbial ecology studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7142639
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71426392020-04-15 Comparative Studies on the Polymorphism and Copy Number Variation of mtSSU rDNA in Ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora): Implications for Phylogenetic, Environmental, and Ecological Research Wang, Yurui Jiang, Yaohan Liu, Yongqiang Li, Yuan Katz, Laura A. Gao, Feng Yan, Ying Microorganisms Article While nuclear small subunit ribosomal DNA (nSSU rDNA) is the most commonly-used gene marker in studying phylogeny, ecology, abundance, and biodiversity of microbial eukaryotes, mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA (mtSSU rDNA) provides an alternative. Recently, both copy number variation and sequence variation of nSSU rDNA have been demonstrated for diverse organisms, which can contribute to misinterpretation of microbiome data. Given this, we explore patterns for mtSSU rDNA among 13 selected ciliates (representing five classes), a major component of microbial eukaryotes, estimating copy number and sequence variation and comparing to that of nSSU rDNA. Our study reveals: (1) mtSSU rDNA copy number variation is substantially lower than that for nSSU rDNA; (2) mtSSU rDNA copy number ranges from 1.0 × 10(4) to 8.1 × 10(5); (3) a most common sequence of mtSSU rDNA is also found in each cell; (4) the sequence variation of mtSSU rDNA are mainly indels in poly A/T regions, and only half of species have sequence variation, which is fewer than that for nSSU rDNA; and (5) the polymorphisms between haplotypes of mtSSU rDNA would not influence the phylogenetic topology. Together, these data provide more insights into mtSSU rDNA as a powerful marker especially for microbial ecology studies. MDPI 2020-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7142639/ /pubmed/32106521 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8030316 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Yurui
Jiang, Yaohan
Liu, Yongqiang
Li, Yuan
Katz, Laura A.
Gao, Feng
Yan, Ying
Comparative Studies on the Polymorphism and Copy Number Variation of mtSSU rDNA in Ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora): Implications for Phylogenetic, Environmental, and Ecological Research
title Comparative Studies on the Polymorphism and Copy Number Variation of mtSSU rDNA in Ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora): Implications for Phylogenetic, Environmental, and Ecological Research
title_full Comparative Studies on the Polymorphism and Copy Number Variation of mtSSU rDNA in Ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora): Implications for Phylogenetic, Environmental, and Ecological Research
title_fullStr Comparative Studies on the Polymorphism and Copy Number Variation of mtSSU rDNA in Ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora): Implications for Phylogenetic, Environmental, and Ecological Research
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Studies on the Polymorphism and Copy Number Variation of mtSSU rDNA in Ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora): Implications for Phylogenetic, Environmental, and Ecological Research
title_short Comparative Studies on the Polymorphism and Copy Number Variation of mtSSU rDNA in Ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora): Implications for Phylogenetic, Environmental, and Ecological Research
title_sort comparative studies on the polymorphism and copy number variation of mtssu rdna in ciliates (protista, ciliophora): implications for phylogenetic, environmental, and ecological research
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142639/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32106521
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8030316
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyurui comparativestudiesonthepolymorphismandcopynumbervariationofmtssurdnainciliatesprotistaciliophoraimplicationsforphylogeneticenvironmentalandecologicalresearch
AT jiangyaohan comparativestudiesonthepolymorphismandcopynumbervariationofmtssurdnainciliatesprotistaciliophoraimplicationsforphylogeneticenvironmentalandecologicalresearch
AT liuyongqiang comparativestudiesonthepolymorphismandcopynumbervariationofmtssurdnainciliatesprotistaciliophoraimplicationsforphylogeneticenvironmentalandecologicalresearch
AT liyuan comparativestudiesonthepolymorphismandcopynumbervariationofmtssurdnainciliatesprotistaciliophoraimplicationsforphylogeneticenvironmentalandecologicalresearch
AT katzlauraa comparativestudiesonthepolymorphismandcopynumbervariationofmtssurdnainciliatesprotistaciliophoraimplicationsforphylogeneticenvironmentalandecologicalresearch
AT gaofeng comparativestudiesonthepolymorphismandcopynumbervariationofmtssurdnainciliatesprotistaciliophoraimplicationsforphylogeneticenvironmentalandecologicalresearch
AT yanying comparativestudiesonthepolymorphismandcopynumbervariationofmtssurdnainciliatesprotistaciliophoraimplicationsforphylogeneticenvironmentalandecologicalresearch