Cargando…

Effects of Management Strategies on Non-Beak-Trimmed Laying Hens in Furnished Cages that Were Reared in a Non-Cage System

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The practice of beak trimming in laying hens limits the negative consequences of injurious pecking, but could be prohibited by future regulations. We addressed in this study the question of how to prevent or minimize injurious pecking and its consequences, especially when beak trimmi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guinebretière, Maryse, Mika, Amandine, Michel, Virginie, Balaine, Loïc, Thomas, Rodolphe, Keïta, Alassane, Pol, Françoise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10030399
_version_ 1783519464091811840
author Guinebretière, Maryse
Mika, Amandine
Michel, Virginie
Balaine, Loïc
Thomas, Rodolphe
Keïta, Alassane
Pol, Françoise
author_facet Guinebretière, Maryse
Mika, Amandine
Michel, Virginie
Balaine, Loïc
Thomas, Rodolphe
Keïta, Alassane
Pol, Françoise
author_sort Guinebretière, Maryse
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The practice of beak trimming in laying hens limits the negative consequences of injurious pecking, but could be prohibited by future regulations. We addressed in this study the question of how to prevent or minimize injurious pecking and its consequences, especially when beak trimming is not carried out. We found that a combination of different management strategies applied from rearing to laying stages improved to some extent the welfare of non-beak trimmed birds (lower mortality and fear of a novel object, better feather cover up to 61 weeks of age). Fiber supplementation in the feed did not provide any benefit on pecking-related problems. We suggest practical solutions to limit the consequences of injurious pecking where non-beak-trimmed animals are reared in barn system and transferred to furnished cages, while preserving good welfare, health and productivity. ABSTRACT: Beak trimming in laying hens limits the negative consequences of injurious pecking, but could be prohibited by future regulations. This study assessed a combination of management strategies during the rearing period (objects, perches, music, human presence) and laying period (scratching mats, objects, feed fiber supplementation) to raise non-beak-trimmed animals. The welfare and laying performances of beak-trimmed (T) and non-beak-trimmed (NT) ISA Brown birds were compared between groups with (E) or without (NE) these strategies, with or without fiber supplementation in the diet during laying period. Fiber supplementation did not provide any benefit on pecking-related problems. In comparison with NT-NE birds, NT-E birds had lower mortality, were less fearful of a novel object, and had a better feather cover, without a negative impact on productivity (same laying rate and egg quality). Although this study showed advantages of beak trimming (T birds had higher body weights, laying rates and lower hen mortality than NT birds), it highlighted related problems (increasing pullet mortality, decreasing early weights and increasing beak defects). This study proposes practical solutions to limit the consequences of injurious pecking in non-beak-trimmed animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7142790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71427902020-04-14 Effects of Management Strategies on Non-Beak-Trimmed Laying Hens in Furnished Cages that Were Reared in a Non-Cage System Guinebretière, Maryse Mika, Amandine Michel, Virginie Balaine, Loïc Thomas, Rodolphe Keïta, Alassane Pol, Françoise Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The practice of beak trimming in laying hens limits the negative consequences of injurious pecking, but could be prohibited by future regulations. We addressed in this study the question of how to prevent or minimize injurious pecking and its consequences, especially when beak trimming is not carried out. We found that a combination of different management strategies applied from rearing to laying stages improved to some extent the welfare of non-beak trimmed birds (lower mortality and fear of a novel object, better feather cover up to 61 weeks of age). Fiber supplementation in the feed did not provide any benefit on pecking-related problems. We suggest practical solutions to limit the consequences of injurious pecking where non-beak-trimmed animals are reared in barn system and transferred to furnished cages, while preserving good welfare, health and productivity. ABSTRACT: Beak trimming in laying hens limits the negative consequences of injurious pecking, but could be prohibited by future regulations. This study assessed a combination of management strategies during the rearing period (objects, perches, music, human presence) and laying period (scratching mats, objects, feed fiber supplementation) to raise non-beak-trimmed animals. The welfare and laying performances of beak-trimmed (T) and non-beak-trimmed (NT) ISA Brown birds were compared between groups with (E) or without (NE) these strategies, with or without fiber supplementation in the diet during laying period. Fiber supplementation did not provide any benefit on pecking-related problems. In comparison with NT-NE birds, NT-E birds had lower mortality, were less fearful of a novel object, and had a better feather cover, without a negative impact on productivity (same laying rate and egg quality). Although this study showed advantages of beak trimming (T birds had higher body weights, laying rates and lower hen mortality than NT birds), it highlighted related problems (increasing pullet mortality, decreasing early weights and increasing beak defects). This study proposes practical solutions to limit the consequences of injurious pecking in non-beak-trimmed animals. MDPI 2020-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7142790/ /pubmed/32121241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10030399 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guinebretière, Maryse
Mika, Amandine
Michel, Virginie
Balaine, Loïc
Thomas, Rodolphe
Keïta, Alassane
Pol, Françoise
Effects of Management Strategies on Non-Beak-Trimmed Laying Hens in Furnished Cages that Were Reared in a Non-Cage System
title Effects of Management Strategies on Non-Beak-Trimmed Laying Hens in Furnished Cages that Were Reared in a Non-Cage System
title_full Effects of Management Strategies on Non-Beak-Trimmed Laying Hens in Furnished Cages that Were Reared in a Non-Cage System
title_fullStr Effects of Management Strategies on Non-Beak-Trimmed Laying Hens in Furnished Cages that Were Reared in a Non-Cage System
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Management Strategies on Non-Beak-Trimmed Laying Hens in Furnished Cages that Were Reared in a Non-Cage System
title_short Effects of Management Strategies on Non-Beak-Trimmed Laying Hens in Furnished Cages that Were Reared in a Non-Cage System
title_sort effects of management strategies on non-beak-trimmed laying hens in furnished cages that were reared in a non-cage system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10030399
work_keys_str_mv AT guinebretieremaryse effectsofmanagementstrategiesonnonbeaktrimmedlayinghensinfurnishedcagesthatwererearedinanoncagesystem
AT mikaamandine effectsofmanagementstrategiesonnonbeaktrimmedlayinghensinfurnishedcagesthatwererearedinanoncagesystem
AT michelvirginie effectsofmanagementstrategiesonnonbeaktrimmedlayinghensinfurnishedcagesthatwererearedinanoncagesystem
AT balaineloic effectsofmanagementstrategiesonnonbeaktrimmedlayinghensinfurnishedcagesthatwererearedinanoncagesystem
AT thomasrodolphe effectsofmanagementstrategiesonnonbeaktrimmedlayinghensinfurnishedcagesthatwererearedinanoncagesystem
AT keitaalassane effectsofmanagementstrategiesonnonbeaktrimmedlayinghensinfurnishedcagesthatwererearedinanoncagesystem
AT polfrancoise effectsofmanagementstrategiesonnonbeaktrimmedlayinghensinfurnishedcagesthatwererearedinanoncagesystem