Cargando…
Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay
The resulting inflammatory reaction to polyethylene (PE) wear debris, which may result in osteolysis, is still considered to be a main reason for aseptic loosening. In addition to the primary wear in hip joint replacements caused by head-insert articulation, relative motions between the PE liner and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204382 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13061392 |
_version_ | 1783519502946795520 |
---|---|
author | Jaeger, Sebastian Uhler, Maximilian Schroeder, Stefan Beckmann, Nicholas A. Braun, Steffen |
author_facet | Jaeger, Sebastian Uhler, Maximilian Schroeder, Stefan Beckmann, Nicholas A. Braun, Steffen |
author_sort | Jaeger, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | The resulting inflammatory reaction to polyethylene (PE) wear debris, which may result in osteolysis, is still considered to be a main reason for aseptic loosening. In addition to the primary wear in hip joint replacements caused by head-insert articulation, relative motions between the PE liner and the metal cup may cause additional wear. In order to limit this motion, various locking mechanisms were used. We investigated three different locking mechanisms (Aesculap, DePuy, and Zimmer Biomet) to address the resulting relative motion between the acetabular cup and PE liner and the maximum disassembly force. A standardized setting with increasing load levels was used in combination with optically based three-dimensional measurements. In addition the maximum disassembly forces were evaluated according to the ASTM F1820-13 standard. Our data showed significant differences between the groups, with a maximum relative motion at the maximum load level (3.5 kN) of 86.5 ± 32.7 µm. The maximum axial disassembly force was 473.8 ± 94.6 N. The in vitro study showed that various locking mechanisms may influence cup-inlay stability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7142960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71429602020-04-14 Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay Jaeger, Sebastian Uhler, Maximilian Schroeder, Stefan Beckmann, Nicholas A. Braun, Steffen Materials (Basel) Article The resulting inflammatory reaction to polyethylene (PE) wear debris, which may result in osteolysis, is still considered to be a main reason for aseptic loosening. In addition to the primary wear in hip joint replacements caused by head-insert articulation, relative motions between the PE liner and the metal cup may cause additional wear. In order to limit this motion, various locking mechanisms were used. We investigated three different locking mechanisms (Aesculap, DePuy, and Zimmer Biomet) to address the resulting relative motion between the acetabular cup and PE liner and the maximum disassembly force. A standardized setting with increasing load levels was used in combination with optically based three-dimensional measurements. In addition the maximum disassembly forces were evaluated according to the ASTM F1820-13 standard. Our data showed significant differences between the groups, with a maximum relative motion at the maximum load level (3.5 kN) of 86.5 ± 32.7 µm. The maximum axial disassembly force was 473.8 ± 94.6 N. The in vitro study showed that various locking mechanisms may influence cup-inlay stability. MDPI 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7142960/ /pubmed/32204382 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13061392 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jaeger, Sebastian Uhler, Maximilian Schroeder, Stefan Beckmann, Nicholas A. Braun, Steffen Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay |
title | Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay |
title_full | Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay |
title_short | Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay |
title_sort | comparison of different locking mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty: relative motion between cup and inlay |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204382 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13061392 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaegersebastian comparisonofdifferentlockingmechanismsintotalhiparthroplastyrelativemotionbetweencupandinlay AT uhlermaximilian comparisonofdifferentlockingmechanismsintotalhiparthroplastyrelativemotionbetweencupandinlay AT schroederstefan comparisonofdifferentlockingmechanismsintotalhiparthroplastyrelativemotionbetweencupandinlay AT beckmannnicholasa comparisonofdifferentlockingmechanismsintotalhiparthroplastyrelativemotionbetweencupandinlay AT braunsteffen comparisonofdifferentlockingmechanismsintotalhiparthroplastyrelativemotionbetweencupandinlay |