Cargando…

Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay

The resulting inflammatory reaction to polyethylene (PE) wear debris, which may result in osteolysis, is still considered to be a main reason for aseptic loosening. In addition to the primary wear in hip joint replacements caused by head-insert articulation, relative motions between the PE liner and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaeger, Sebastian, Uhler, Maximilian, Schroeder, Stefan, Beckmann, Nicholas A., Braun, Steffen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204382
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13061392
_version_ 1783519502946795520
author Jaeger, Sebastian
Uhler, Maximilian
Schroeder, Stefan
Beckmann, Nicholas A.
Braun, Steffen
author_facet Jaeger, Sebastian
Uhler, Maximilian
Schroeder, Stefan
Beckmann, Nicholas A.
Braun, Steffen
author_sort Jaeger, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description The resulting inflammatory reaction to polyethylene (PE) wear debris, which may result in osteolysis, is still considered to be a main reason for aseptic loosening. In addition to the primary wear in hip joint replacements caused by head-insert articulation, relative motions between the PE liner and the metal cup may cause additional wear. In order to limit this motion, various locking mechanisms were used. We investigated three different locking mechanisms (Aesculap, DePuy, and Zimmer Biomet) to address the resulting relative motion between the acetabular cup and PE liner and the maximum disassembly force. A standardized setting with increasing load levels was used in combination with optically based three-dimensional measurements. In addition the maximum disassembly forces were evaluated according to the ASTM F1820-13 standard. Our data showed significant differences between the groups, with a maximum relative motion at the maximum load level (3.5 kN) of 86.5 ± 32.7 µm. The maximum axial disassembly force was 473.8 ± 94.6 N. The in vitro study showed that various locking mechanisms may influence cup-inlay stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7142960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71429602020-04-14 Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay Jaeger, Sebastian Uhler, Maximilian Schroeder, Stefan Beckmann, Nicholas A. Braun, Steffen Materials (Basel) Article The resulting inflammatory reaction to polyethylene (PE) wear debris, which may result in osteolysis, is still considered to be a main reason for aseptic loosening. In addition to the primary wear in hip joint replacements caused by head-insert articulation, relative motions between the PE liner and the metal cup may cause additional wear. In order to limit this motion, various locking mechanisms were used. We investigated three different locking mechanisms (Aesculap, DePuy, and Zimmer Biomet) to address the resulting relative motion between the acetabular cup and PE liner and the maximum disassembly force. A standardized setting with increasing load levels was used in combination with optically based three-dimensional measurements. In addition the maximum disassembly forces were evaluated according to the ASTM F1820-13 standard. Our data showed significant differences between the groups, with a maximum relative motion at the maximum load level (3.5 kN) of 86.5 ± 32.7 µm. The maximum axial disassembly force was 473.8 ± 94.6 N. The in vitro study showed that various locking mechanisms may influence cup-inlay stability. MDPI 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7142960/ /pubmed/32204382 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13061392 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jaeger, Sebastian
Uhler, Maximilian
Schroeder, Stefan
Beckmann, Nicholas A.
Braun, Steffen
Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay
title Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay
title_full Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay
title_short Comparison of Different Locking Mechanisms in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relative Motion between Cup and Inlay
title_sort comparison of different locking mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty: relative motion between cup and inlay
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32204382
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13061392
work_keys_str_mv AT jaegersebastian comparisonofdifferentlockingmechanismsintotalhiparthroplastyrelativemotionbetweencupandinlay
AT uhlermaximilian comparisonofdifferentlockingmechanismsintotalhiparthroplastyrelativemotionbetweencupandinlay
AT schroederstefan comparisonofdifferentlockingmechanismsintotalhiparthroplastyrelativemotionbetweencupandinlay
AT beckmannnicholasa comparisonofdifferentlockingmechanismsintotalhiparthroplastyrelativemotionbetweencupandinlay
AT braunsteffen comparisonofdifferentlockingmechanismsintotalhiparthroplastyrelativemotionbetweencupandinlay