Cargando…
Methods of Disinfecting Stethoscopes: Systematic Review
The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effectiveness of various disinfection methods available for stethoscopes. In March 2019, we performed a search in PubMed and Scopus using the search terms: “reducing stethoscopes contamination” and “disinfection stethoscopes”; the Mesh terms u...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7143198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32182989 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061856 |
_version_ | 1783519557761105920 |
---|---|
author | Napolitani, Margherita Bezzini, Daiana Moirano, Fulvio Bedogni, Corrado Messina, Gabriele |
author_facet | Napolitani, Margherita Bezzini, Daiana Moirano, Fulvio Bedogni, Corrado Messina, Gabriele |
author_sort | Napolitani, Margherita |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effectiveness of various disinfection methods available for stethoscopes. In March 2019, we performed a search in PubMed and Scopus using the search terms: “reducing stethoscopes contamination” and “disinfection stethoscopes”; the Mesh terms used in PubMed were “Decontamination/methods” or “Disinfection/methods” and “Stethoscopes/microbiology”. Selection criteria were: English language; at least one disinfection method tested. A total of 253 publications were screened. After title, abstract, and full-text analysis, 17 papers were included in the systematic review. Ethanol at 90%, Ethanol-Based Hands Sanitizer (EBHS), triclosan, chlorhexidine, isopropyl alcohol, 66% ethyl alcohol, sodium hypochlorite, and benzalkonium chloride have been proven to lower the presence of bacteria on stethoscopes’ surfaces. In addition, alcohol wipes show effective results. A wearable device emitting ultraviolet C by Light-Emitting Diode (LED) resulted efficacious against common microorganisms involved in Healthcare Associated Infections. The cover impregnated with silver ions seemed to be associated with significantly higher colony counts. Instead, copper stethoscopes surface reduced bacterial load. The disinfection of stethoscopes appears to be essential. There are many valid methods available; the choice depends on various factors, such as the cost, availability, and practicality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7143198 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71431982020-04-14 Methods of Disinfecting Stethoscopes: Systematic Review Napolitani, Margherita Bezzini, Daiana Moirano, Fulvio Bedogni, Corrado Messina, Gabriele Int J Environ Res Public Health Review The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effectiveness of various disinfection methods available for stethoscopes. In March 2019, we performed a search in PubMed and Scopus using the search terms: “reducing stethoscopes contamination” and “disinfection stethoscopes”; the Mesh terms used in PubMed were “Decontamination/methods” or “Disinfection/methods” and “Stethoscopes/microbiology”. Selection criteria were: English language; at least one disinfection method tested. A total of 253 publications were screened. After title, abstract, and full-text analysis, 17 papers were included in the systematic review. Ethanol at 90%, Ethanol-Based Hands Sanitizer (EBHS), triclosan, chlorhexidine, isopropyl alcohol, 66% ethyl alcohol, sodium hypochlorite, and benzalkonium chloride have been proven to lower the presence of bacteria on stethoscopes’ surfaces. In addition, alcohol wipes show effective results. A wearable device emitting ultraviolet C by Light-Emitting Diode (LED) resulted efficacious against common microorganisms involved in Healthcare Associated Infections. The cover impregnated with silver ions seemed to be associated with significantly higher colony counts. Instead, copper stethoscopes surface reduced bacterial load. The disinfection of stethoscopes appears to be essential. There are many valid methods available; the choice depends on various factors, such as the cost, availability, and practicality. MDPI 2020-03-13 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7143198/ /pubmed/32182989 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061856 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Napolitani, Margherita Bezzini, Daiana Moirano, Fulvio Bedogni, Corrado Messina, Gabriele Methods of Disinfecting Stethoscopes: Systematic Review |
title | Methods of Disinfecting Stethoscopes: Systematic Review |
title_full | Methods of Disinfecting Stethoscopes: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Methods of Disinfecting Stethoscopes: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods of Disinfecting Stethoscopes: Systematic Review |
title_short | Methods of Disinfecting Stethoscopes: Systematic Review |
title_sort | methods of disinfecting stethoscopes: systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7143198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32182989 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061856 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT napolitanimargherita methodsofdisinfectingstethoscopessystematicreview AT bezzinidaiana methodsofdisinfectingstethoscopessystematicreview AT moiranofulvio methodsofdisinfectingstethoscopessystematicreview AT bedognicorrado methodsofdisinfectingstethoscopessystematicreview AT messinagabriele methodsofdisinfectingstethoscopessystematicreview |