Cargando…
Perceptions of Prominent Animal Welfare and Veterinary Care Organizations in the United States
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Public perception of animal well-being, and pet animal well-being in particular, remains a significant point of contention. This study ranks prominent animal welfare and veterinary care organizations’ perceived impact on pet animal well-being and health care based on U.S. residents’...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7143340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32178242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10030472 |
_version_ | 1783519589853822976 |
---|---|
author | Ortez, Mario Bir, Courtney Widmar, Nicole Olynk Wolf, Christopher A. |
author_facet | Ortez, Mario Bir, Courtney Widmar, Nicole Olynk Wolf, Christopher A. |
author_sort | Ortez, Mario |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Public perception of animal well-being, and pet animal well-being in particular, remains a significant point of contention. This study ranks prominent animal welfare and veterinary care organizations’ perceived impact on pet animal well-being and health care based on U.S. residents’ perceptions, while explicitly accounting for variation between pet-owning and non-pet-owning households. Results suggest that the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) is perceived as the most impactful organization followed by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) and the American Humane Association (AHA) were tied for third most impactful. The American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA) and the American Pet Products Association (APPA) were tied for fourth most impactful while Banfield was perceived as the least impactful. ABSTRACT: U.S. residents’ perceptions of the impact of prominent animal welfare and veterinary care organizations on pet animal well-being and health care may not be linked to the organization’s stated mission and effectiveness in advancing it, but to the level of recognition people have for the groups. An online survey of 1000 U.S. residents was used to understand the perceived impact of organizations with self-stated dedication to pet animal well-being. Using a Likert-scale, respondents ranked 13 prominent organizations as having a low to high impact on pet animal well-being and health care. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) had the highest perceived average impact, while People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) had the lowest. A best–worst scaling (BWS) choice experiment was conducted with 7 of the initial 13 organizations to elicit relative rankings by forcing tradeoffs by respondents. Consistent with the Likert-scale results, the ASPCA was ranked as the most impactful organization. The ASPCA’s perceived impact on pet animal well-being and health care may be linked to their high level of recognition among respondents, as this was the organization that respondents most frequently reported having seen/heard stories related to animal well-being and health care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7143340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71433402020-04-14 Perceptions of Prominent Animal Welfare and Veterinary Care Organizations in the United States Ortez, Mario Bir, Courtney Widmar, Nicole Olynk Wolf, Christopher A. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Public perception of animal well-being, and pet animal well-being in particular, remains a significant point of contention. This study ranks prominent animal welfare and veterinary care organizations’ perceived impact on pet animal well-being and health care based on U.S. residents’ perceptions, while explicitly accounting for variation between pet-owning and non-pet-owning households. Results suggest that the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) is perceived as the most impactful organization followed by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) and the American Humane Association (AHA) were tied for third most impactful. The American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA) and the American Pet Products Association (APPA) were tied for fourth most impactful while Banfield was perceived as the least impactful. ABSTRACT: U.S. residents’ perceptions of the impact of prominent animal welfare and veterinary care organizations on pet animal well-being and health care may not be linked to the organization’s stated mission and effectiveness in advancing it, but to the level of recognition people have for the groups. An online survey of 1000 U.S. residents was used to understand the perceived impact of organizations with self-stated dedication to pet animal well-being. Using a Likert-scale, respondents ranked 13 prominent organizations as having a low to high impact on pet animal well-being and health care. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) had the highest perceived average impact, while People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) had the lowest. A best–worst scaling (BWS) choice experiment was conducted with 7 of the initial 13 organizations to elicit relative rankings by forcing tradeoffs by respondents. Consistent with the Likert-scale results, the ASPCA was ranked as the most impactful organization. The ASPCA’s perceived impact on pet animal well-being and health care may be linked to their high level of recognition among respondents, as this was the organization that respondents most frequently reported having seen/heard stories related to animal well-being and health care. MDPI 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7143340/ /pubmed/32178242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10030472 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ortez, Mario Bir, Courtney Widmar, Nicole Olynk Wolf, Christopher A. Perceptions of Prominent Animal Welfare and Veterinary Care Organizations in the United States |
title | Perceptions of Prominent Animal Welfare and Veterinary Care Organizations in the United States |
title_full | Perceptions of Prominent Animal Welfare and Veterinary Care Organizations in the United States |
title_fullStr | Perceptions of Prominent Animal Welfare and Veterinary Care Organizations in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Perceptions of Prominent Animal Welfare and Veterinary Care Organizations in the United States |
title_short | Perceptions of Prominent Animal Welfare and Veterinary Care Organizations in the United States |
title_sort | perceptions of prominent animal welfare and veterinary care organizations in the united states |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7143340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32178242 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10030472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ortezmario perceptionsofprominentanimalwelfareandveterinarycareorganizationsintheunitedstates AT bircourtney perceptionsofprominentanimalwelfareandveterinarycareorganizationsintheunitedstates AT widmarnicoleolynk perceptionsofprominentanimalwelfareandveterinarycareorganizationsintheunitedstates AT wolfchristophera perceptionsofprominentanimalwelfareandveterinarycareorganizationsintheunitedstates |