Cargando…
Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis
Currently, there is no meta-analysis comparing intravaginal misoprostol plus intracervical Foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol alone for term pregnancy without identifying risk factors. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized...
Autores principales: | Lee, Howard Hao, Huang, Ben-Shian, Cheng, Min, Yeh, Chang-Ching, Lin, I-Chia, Horng, Huann-Cheng, Huang, Hsin-Yi, Lee, Wen-Ling, Wang, Peng-Hui |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7143495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32168947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061825 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of Intracervical Foley’s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Kadu, Nivedita A, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction
por: Elpo, Jhonathan Alcides, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: a randomized clinical trial
por: Abdi, Nazanin, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Intravaginal isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH) versus misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to hysteroscopy
por: Haghighi, Ladan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Vahid Roudsari, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)