Cargando…

Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different?

Rural Australians experience a range of health inequities—including higher rates of suicide—when compared to the general population. This retrospective cohort study compares demographic characteristics and suicide death circumstances of farming- and non-farming-related suicides in rural Victoria wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kennedy, Alison, Adams, Jessie, Dwyer, Jeremy, Rahman, Muhammad Aziz, Brumby, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7143525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32197446
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062010
_version_ 1783519632759455744
author Kennedy, Alison
Adams, Jessie
Dwyer, Jeremy
Rahman, Muhammad Aziz
Brumby, Susan
author_facet Kennedy, Alison
Adams, Jessie
Dwyer, Jeremy
Rahman, Muhammad Aziz
Brumby, Susan
author_sort Kennedy, Alison
collection PubMed
description Rural Australians experience a range of health inequities—including higher rates of suicide—when compared to the general population. This retrospective cohort study compares demographic characteristics and suicide death circumstances of farming- and non-farming-related suicides in rural Victoria with the aim of: (a) exploring the contributing factors to farming-related suicide in Australia’s largest agricultural producing state; and (b) examining whether farming-related suicides differ from suicide in rural communities. Farming-related suicide deaths were more likely to: (a) be employed at the time of death (52.6% vs. 37.7%, OR = 1.84, 95% CIs 1.28–2.64); and, (b) have died through use of a firearm (30.1% vs. 8.7%, OR = 4.51, 95% CIs 2.97–6.92). However, farming-related suicides were less likely to (a) have a diagnosed mental illness (36.1% vs. 46.1%, OR=0.66, 95% CIs 0.46–0.96) and, (b) have received mental health support more than six weeks prior to death (39.8% vs. 50.0%, OR = 0.66, 95% CIs 0.46–0.95). A range of suicide prevention strategies need adopting across all segments of the rural population irrespective of farming status. However, data from farming-related suicides highlight the need for targeted firearm-related suicide prevention measures and appropriate, tailored and accessible support services to support health, well-being and safety for members of farming communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7143525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71435252020-04-14 Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different? Kennedy, Alison Adams, Jessie Dwyer, Jeremy Rahman, Muhammad Aziz Brumby, Susan Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Rural Australians experience a range of health inequities—including higher rates of suicide—when compared to the general population. This retrospective cohort study compares demographic characteristics and suicide death circumstances of farming- and non-farming-related suicides in rural Victoria with the aim of: (a) exploring the contributing factors to farming-related suicide in Australia’s largest agricultural producing state; and (b) examining whether farming-related suicides differ from suicide in rural communities. Farming-related suicide deaths were more likely to: (a) be employed at the time of death (52.6% vs. 37.7%, OR = 1.84, 95% CIs 1.28–2.64); and, (b) have died through use of a firearm (30.1% vs. 8.7%, OR = 4.51, 95% CIs 2.97–6.92). However, farming-related suicides were less likely to (a) have a diagnosed mental illness (36.1% vs. 46.1%, OR=0.66, 95% CIs 0.46–0.96) and, (b) have received mental health support more than six weeks prior to death (39.8% vs. 50.0%, OR = 0.66, 95% CIs 0.46–0.95). A range of suicide prevention strategies need adopting across all segments of the rural population irrespective of farming status. However, data from farming-related suicides highlight the need for targeted firearm-related suicide prevention measures and appropriate, tailored and accessible support services to support health, well-being and safety for members of farming communities. MDPI 2020-03-18 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7143525/ /pubmed/32197446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062010 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kennedy, Alison
Adams, Jessie
Dwyer, Jeremy
Rahman, Muhammad Aziz
Brumby, Susan
Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different?
title Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different?
title_full Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different?
title_fullStr Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different?
title_full_unstemmed Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different?
title_short Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different?
title_sort suicide in rural australia: are farming-related suicides different?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7143525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32197446
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062010
work_keys_str_mv AT kennedyalison suicideinruralaustraliaarefarmingrelatedsuicidesdifferent
AT adamsjessie suicideinruralaustraliaarefarmingrelatedsuicidesdifferent
AT dwyerjeremy suicideinruralaustraliaarefarmingrelatedsuicidesdifferent
AT rahmanmuhammadaziz suicideinruralaustraliaarefarmingrelatedsuicidesdifferent
AT brumbysusan suicideinruralaustraliaarefarmingrelatedsuicidesdifferent