Cargando…
Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different?
Rural Australians experience a range of health inequities—including higher rates of suicide—when compared to the general population. This retrospective cohort study compares demographic characteristics and suicide death circumstances of farming- and non-farming-related suicides in rural Victoria wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7143525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32197446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062010 |
_version_ | 1783519632759455744 |
---|---|
author | Kennedy, Alison Adams, Jessie Dwyer, Jeremy Rahman, Muhammad Aziz Brumby, Susan |
author_facet | Kennedy, Alison Adams, Jessie Dwyer, Jeremy Rahman, Muhammad Aziz Brumby, Susan |
author_sort | Kennedy, Alison |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rural Australians experience a range of health inequities—including higher rates of suicide—when compared to the general population. This retrospective cohort study compares demographic characteristics and suicide death circumstances of farming- and non-farming-related suicides in rural Victoria with the aim of: (a) exploring the contributing factors to farming-related suicide in Australia’s largest agricultural producing state; and (b) examining whether farming-related suicides differ from suicide in rural communities. Farming-related suicide deaths were more likely to: (a) be employed at the time of death (52.6% vs. 37.7%, OR = 1.84, 95% CIs 1.28–2.64); and, (b) have died through use of a firearm (30.1% vs. 8.7%, OR = 4.51, 95% CIs 2.97–6.92). However, farming-related suicides were less likely to (a) have a diagnosed mental illness (36.1% vs. 46.1%, OR=0.66, 95% CIs 0.46–0.96) and, (b) have received mental health support more than six weeks prior to death (39.8% vs. 50.0%, OR = 0.66, 95% CIs 0.46–0.95). A range of suicide prevention strategies need adopting across all segments of the rural population irrespective of farming status. However, data from farming-related suicides highlight the need for targeted firearm-related suicide prevention measures and appropriate, tailored and accessible support services to support health, well-being and safety for members of farming communities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7143525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71435252020-04-14 Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different? Kennedy, Alison Adams, Jessie Dwyer, Jeremy Rahman, Muhammad Aziz Brumby, Susan Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Rural Australians experience a range of health inequities—including higher rates of suicide—when compared to the general population. This retrospective cohort study compares demographic characteristics and suicide death circumstances of farming- and non-farming-related suicides in rural Victoria with the aim of: (a) exploring the contributing factors to farming-related suicide in Australia’s largest agricultural producing state; and (b) examining whether farming-related suicides differ from suicide in rural communities. Farming-related suicide deaths were more likely to: (a) be employed at the time of death (52.6% vs. 37.7%, OR = 1.84, 95% CIs 1.28–2.64); and, (b) have died through use of a firearm (30.1% vs. 8.7%, OR = 4.51, 95% CIs 2.97–6.92). However, farming-related suicides were less likely to (a) have a diagnosed mental illness (36.1% vs. 46.1%, OR=0.66, 95% CIs 0.46–0.96) and, (b) have received mental health support more than six weeks prior to death (39.8% vs. 50.0%, OR = 0.66, 95% CIs 0.46–0.95). A range of suicide prevention strategies need adopting across all segments of the rural population irrespective of farming status. However, data from farming-related suicides highlight the need for targeted firearm-related suicide prevention measures and appropriate, tailored and accessible support services to support health, well-being and safety for members of farming communities. MDPI 2020-03-18 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7143525/ /pubmed/32197446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062010 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kennedy, Alison Adams, Jessie Dwyer, Jeremy Rahman, Muhammad Aziz Brumby, Susan Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different? |
title | Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different? |
title_full | Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different? |
title_fullStr | Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different? |
title_full_unstemmed | Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different? |
title_short | Suicide in Rural Australia: Are Farming-Related Suicides Different? |
title_sort | suicide in rural australia: are farming-related suicides different? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7143525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32197446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kennedyalison suicideinruralaustraliaarefarmingrelatedsuicidesdifferent AT adamsjessie suicideinruralaustraliaarefarmingrelatedsuicidesdifferent AT dwyerjeremy suicideinruralaustraliaarefarmingrelatedsuicidesdifferent AT rahmanmuhammadaziz suicideinruralaustraliaarefarmingrelatedsuicidesdifferent AT brumbysusan suicideinruralaustraliaarefarmingrelatedsuicidesdifferent |