Cargando…

An Upfront Two-Stent Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions with A Large Side Branch in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study

Background and Objectives: Little is known about the upfront two-stent strategy (U2SS) for true coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aimed to present our two-year follow-up results on the U2SS by using different two-stent techniques for the true CBL with a large s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yurtdaş, Mustafa, Asoğlu, Ramazan, Özdemir, Mahmut, Asoğlu, Emin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7143646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121323
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56030102
_version_ 1783519661611024384
author Yurtdaş, Mustafa
Asoğlu, Ramazan
Özdemir, Mahmut
Asoğlu, Emin
author_facet Yurtdaş, Mustafa
Asoğlu, Ramazan
Özdemir, Mahmut
Asoğlu, Emin
author_sort Yurtdaş, Mustafa
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Little is known about the upfront two-stent strategy (U2SS) for true coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aimed to present our two-year follow-up results on the U2SS by using different two-stent techniques for the true CBL with a large side branch (SB) in ACS patients, including unstable angina (UA), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and to identify independent predictors of the presence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) after intervention. Materials and Methods: The study included 201 consecutive ACS patients with true CBLs who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using U2SS from October 2015 to March 2018. Clinical outcomes at follow-up were assessed. MACE was defined as a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results: 31.3% of the patients had an UA, 46.3% had an NSTEMI, and 22.4% had an STEMI. CBL was most frequently located in the left anterior descending (LAD)/diagonal artery (59.2%). In total, 71.1% of the patients had a Medina classification (1,1,1). Overall, 62.2% of cases were treated with mini-crush stenting. Clopidogrel was given in 23.9% of the patients; 71.1% of the patients received everolimus eluting stent (EES); and 11.9% received a sirolimus eluting stent (SES). Final kissing balloon inflation was carried out in all patients, with an unsatisfactory rate of 5%. A proximal optimization technique sequence was successfully carried out in all patients. The MACE incidence was 16.9% with a median follow-up period of 2.1 years. There were seven cardiac deaths (3.5%). The TLR rate was 13.4% (n = 27), with PCI treatment in 16 patients, and coronary artery bypass grafting treatment in 11 patients. After multivariate penalized logistic regression analysis (Firth logistic regression), clopidogrel use (odds ratio (OR): 2.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41–2.51; p = 0.007) and SES use (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 0.31–2.64; p = 0.014) were independent predictors of the presence of MACE. Conclusion: U2SS is feasible and safe for the true CBLs with large and diseased SB in ACS patients, and is related to a relatively low incidence of MACE. Clopidogrel use and SES use may predict the MACE development in ACS patients treated using U2SS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7143646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71436462020-04-14 An Upfront Two-Stent Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions with A Large Side Branch in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study Yurtdaş, Mustafa Asoğlu, Ramazan Özdemir, Mahmut Asoğlu, Emin Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Little is known about the upfront two-stent strategy (U2SS) for true coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aimed to present our two-year follow-up results on the U2SS by using different two-stent techniques for the true CBL with a large side branch (SB) in ACS patients, including unstable angina (UA), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and to identify independent predictors of the presence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) after intervention. Materials and Methods: The study included 201 consecutive ACS patients with true CBLs who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using U2SS from October 2015 to March 2018. Clinical outcomes at follow-up were assessed. MACE was defined as a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results: 31.3% of the patients had an UA, 46.3% had an NSTEMI, and 22.4% had an STEMI. CBL was most frequently located in the left anterior descending (LAD)/diagonal artery (59.2%). In total, 71.1% of the patients had a Medina classification (1,1,1). Overall, 62.2% of cases were treated with mini-crush stenting. Clopidogrel was given in 23.9% of the patients; 71.1% of the patients received everolimus eluting stent (EES); and 11.9% received a sirolimus eluting stent (SES). Final kissing balloon inflation was carried out in all patients, with an unsatisfactory rate of 5%. A proximal optimization technique sequence was successfully carried out in all patients. The MACE incidence was 16.9% with a median follow-up period of 2.1 years. There were seven cardiac deaths (3.5%). The TLR rate was 13.4% (n = 27), with PCI treatment in 16 patients, and coronary artery bypass grafting treatment in 11 patients. After multivariate penalized logistic regression analysis (Firth logistic regression), clopidogrel use (odds ratio (OR): 2.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41–2.51; p = 0.007) and SES use (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 0.31–2.64; p = 0.014) were independent predictors of the presence of MACE. Conclusion: U2SS is feasible and safe for the true CBLs with large and diseased SB in ACS patients, and is related to a relatively low incidence of MACE. Clopidogrel use and SES use may predict the MACE development in ACS patients treated using U2SS. MDPI 2020-02-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7143646/ /pubmed/32121323 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56030102 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yurtdaş, Mustafa
Asoğlu, Ramazan
Özdemir, Mahmut
Asoğlu, Emin
An Upfront Two-Stent Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions with A Large Side Branch in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title An Upfront Two-Stent Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions with A Large Side Branch in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full An Upfront Two-Stent Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions with A Large Side Branch in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_fullStr An Upfront Two-Stent Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions with A Large Side Branch in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full_unstemmed An Upfront Two-Stent Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions with A Large Side Branch in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_short An Upfront Two-Stent Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions with A Large Side Branch in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Two-Year Follow-Up Study
title_sort upfront two-stent strategy for true coronary bifurcation lesions with a large side branch in acute coronary syndrome: a two-year follow-up study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7143646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121323
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56030102
work_keys_str_mv AT yurtdasmustafa anupfronttwostentstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionswithalargesidebranchinacutecoronarysyndromeatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT asogluramazan anupfronttwostentstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionswithalargesidebranchinacutecoronarysyndromeatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT ozdemirmahmut anupfronttwostentstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionswithalargesidebranchinacutecoronarysyndromeatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT asogluemin anupfronttwostentstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionswithalargesidebranchinacutecoronarysyndromeatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT yurtdasmustafa upfronttwostentstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionswithalargesidebranchinacutecoronarysyndromeatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT asogluramazan upfronttwostentstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionswithalargesidebranchinacutecoronarysyndromeatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT ozdemirmahmut upfronttwostentstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionswithalargesidebranchinacutecoronarysyndromeatwoyearfollowupstudy
AT asogluemin upfronttwostentstrategyfortruecoronarybifurcationlesionswithalargesidebranchinacutecoronarysyndromeatwoyearfollowupstudy