Cargando…

Effect of horizontal margin status and risk of local recurrence after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) sometimes results in en bloc resection with a positive or inconclusive horizontal margin (HM1 or HMX, respectively) on histological evaluation. The specific risk for such situations is unclear. We therefore investigated the outcome of ESD wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukuda, Hiromu, Ishihara, Ryu, Shimamoto, Yusaku, Kono, Mitsuhiro, Nakagawa, Kentaro, Ohmori, Masayasu, Matsuno, Kenshi, Iwagami, Hiroyoshi, Inoue, Shuntaro, Iwatsubo, Taro, Nakahira, Hiroko, Matsuura, Noriko, Shichijo, Satoki, Maekawa, Akira, Kanesaka, Takashi, Takeuchi, Yoji, Higashino, Koji, Uedo, Noriya, Kitamura, Masanori, Nakatsuka, Shinichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12233
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) sometimes results in en bloc resection with a positive or inconclusive horizontal margin (HM1 or HMX, respectively) on histological evaluation. The specific risk for such situations is unclear. We therefore investigated the outcome of ESD with HM1 or HMX. METHODS: This single‐center retrospective study was performed at Osaka International Cancer Institute. A total of 886 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma lesions in 749 patients treated from April 2005 to June 2015 were evaluated according to the following inclusion criteria: en bloc resection with no residual lesion, HM1 or HMX status, no prior treatment, and no additional treatment. We classified HM1 and HMX into type A, in which cancer was exposed on the HM, and type B, in which the HM status was unclear because of mechanical or thermal damage. We further classified type B according to the distance between the cancer and the edge of the specimen: type B1, <1 mm and type B2, ≥1 mm. RESULTS: The resection margin was judged as HM1 or HMX in 5.0% (39/767; 95% confidence interval, 3.5–6.6%) of the en bloc resected specimens. Of 39 lesions, 30 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Local recurrence developed in 8 of 30 lesions (26.7%). The local recurrence rates for types A, B1, and B2 were 40% (6/15 lesions), 28.5% (2/7 lesions), and 0.0% (0/8 lesions), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although a statistical analysis was not conducted because of the limited events, the pathological HM status may be a useful predictor of local recurrence.