Cargando…

Factors affecting bowel preparation adequacy and procedural time

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Poor bowel preparation results in difficult colonoscopies, missed lesions, and repeat procedures. Identifying patient risk factors for poor bowel preparation, such as prolonged runway time and prolonged cecal intubation, will aid in interventions prior to a procedure. METHODS: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zad, Mohammadali, Do, Cuong N, Heffernan, Aaron, Johnston, Lucy, Al‐Ansari, Mohammed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12241
_version_ 1783519887032844288
author Zad, Mohammadali
Do, Cuong N
Heffernan, Aaron
Johnston, Lucy
Al‐Ansari, Mohammed
author_facet Zad, Mohammadali
Do, Cuong N
Heffernan, Aaron
Johnston, Lucy
Al‐Ansari, Mohammed
author_sort Zad, Mohammadali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Poor bowel preparation results in difficult colonoscopies, missed lesions, and repeat procedures. Identifying patient risk factors for poor bowel preparation, such as prolonged runway time and prolonged cecal intubation, will aid in interventions prior to a procedure. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single‐center analysis of 3 295 colonoscopies performed between May 2012 and November 2014. Indications for colonoscopy included gastrointestinal bleed and anemia, change in bowel habits, for screening, and others (including planning re‐anastomoses, abdominal distension, family history and angioectasias). Data were collected from medical charts and endoscopy reports. Comparisons between patient factors and runway time were made with adequacy of bowel preparation as the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Male and diabetic patients had statistically higher rates of inadequate bowel preparation and prolonged cecal intubation times. A previous history of abdominal surgery also demonstrated prolonged cecal intubation. A runway time of ≤7.63 h was associated with higher rates of adequate bowel preparation by multivariate analysis. The optimal time frame is 3–6 h for the highest success rates. CONCLUSION: Patient risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation or prolonged cecal intubation should signal clinicians to intervene prior to colonoscopy. A runway time between 3 and 6 h is optimal for adequate bowel preparation. This may involve further patient education, along with work flow optimization, to facilitate ideal runway times. Future studies should explore how to avoid repeat endoscopies using protocols enforcing this timeframe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7144787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71447872020-04-10 Factors affecting bowel preparation adequacy and procedural time Zad, Mohammadali Do, Cuong N Heffernan, Aaron Johnston, Lucy Al‐Ansari, Mohammed JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: Poor bowel preparation results in difficult colonoscopies, missed lesions, and repeat procedures. Identifying patient risk factors for poor bowel preparation, such as prolonged runway time and prolonged cecal intubation, will aid in interventions prior to a procedure. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single‐center analysis of 3 295 colonoscopies performed between May 2012 and November 2014. Indications for colonoscopy included gastrointestinal bleed and anemia, change in bowel habits, for screening, and others (including planning re‐anastomoses, abdominal distension, family history and angioectasias). Data were collected from medical charts and endoscopy reports. Comparisons between patient factors and runway time were made with adequacy of bowel preparation as the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Male and diabetic patients had statistically higher rates of inadequate bowel preparation and prolonged cecal intubation times. A previous history of abdominal surgery also demonstrated prolonged cecal intubation. A runway time of ≤7.63 h was associated with higher rates of adequate bowel preparation by multivariate analysis. The optimal time frame is 3–6 h for the highest success rates. CONCLUSION: Patient risk factors for inadequate bowel preparation or prolonged cecal intubation should signal clinicians to intervene prior to colonoscopy. A runway time between 3 and 6 h is optimal for adequate bowel preparation. This may involve further patient education, along with work flow optimization, to facilitate ideal runway times. Future studies should explore how to avoid repeat endoscopies using protocols enforcing this timeframe. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2019-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7144787/ /pubmed/32280766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12241 Text en © 2019 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zad, Mohammadali
Do, Cuong N
Heffernan, Aaron
Johnston, Lucy
Al‐Ansari, Mohammed
Factors affecting bowel preparation adequacy and procedural time
title Factors affecting bowel preparation adequacy and procedural time
title_full Factors affecting bowel preparation adequacy and procedural time
title_fullStr Factors affecting bowel preparation adequacy and procedural time
title_full_unstemmed Factors affecting bowel preparation adequacy and procedural time
title_short Factors affecting bowel preparation adequacy and procedural time
title_sort factors affecting bowel preparation adequacy and procedural time
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12241
work_keys_str_mv AT zadmohammadali factorsaffectingbowelpreparationadequacyandproceduraltime
AT docuongn factorsaffectingbowelpreparationadequacyandproceduraltime
AT heffernanaaron factorsaffectingbowelpreparationadequacyandproceduraltime
AT johnstonlucy factorsaffectingbowelpreparationadequacyandproceduraltime
AT alansarimohammed factorsaffectingbowelpreparationadequacyandproceduraltime