Cargando…

Evaluation of lactulose, lactose, and fructose breath testing in clinical practice: A focus on methane

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Breath testing (BT) is used to identify carbohydrate malabsorption and small intestine bacterial overgrowth. Measuring methane alongside hydrogen is advocated to reduce false‐negative studies, but the variability of methane production is unknown. The aim of this study is to exami...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harvie, Ruth M, Tuck, Caroline J, Schultz, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12240
_version_ 1783519888252338176
author Harvie, Ruth M
Tuck, Caroline J
Schultz, Michael
author_facet Harvie, Ruth M
Tuck, Caroline J
Schultz, Michael
author_sort Harvie, Ruth M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Breath testing (BT) is used to identify carbohydrate malabsorption and small intestine bacterial overgrowth. Measuring methane alongside hydrogen is advocated to reduce false‐negative studies, but the variability of methane production is unknown. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of high methane production on hydrogen excretion after ingesting lactulose, fructose, or lactose. METHODS: A retrospective audit was performed of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms who underwent BT. Following a low fermentable carbohydrate diet for 24‐h, a fasting BT before consuming 35 ml lactulose, 35 g fructose, or lactose in 200 ml water, followed by BT every 10–15 min for up to 3‐h, was performed. A positive test was defined as a ≥20 ppm rise of hydrogen or methane from baseline. A high methane producer had an initial reading of ≥5 ppm. Breath hydrogen and methane production were measured as area under the curve. Chi‐squared tests were used to compare proportions of those meeting the cut‐off criteria. RESULTS: Of patients, 26% (28/106) were high methane producers at their initial lactulose test. The test–retest repeatability of methane production was high, with the same methane production status before ingesting lactose in all (70/70) and before ingesting fructose in most (71/73). Methane production was highly variable during testing, with 38% (10/26) having ≥1 reading lower than baseline. Hydrogen produced by high or low methane producers did not differ (1528 [960–3645] ppm min vs 2375 [1810–3195] ppm min [P = 0.11]). Symptoms and breath test results were not positively related. CONCLUSION: The validity of including an increase of ≥20 ppm methane to identify carbohydrate malabsorption or small intestine bacterial overgrowth should be questioned due to the variability of readings during testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7144793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71447932020-04-10 Evaluation of lactulose, lactose, and fructose breath testing in clinical practice: A focus on methane Harvie, Ruth M Tuck, Caroline J Schultz, Michael JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: Breath testing (BT) is used to identify carbohydrate malabsorption and small intestine bacterial overgrowth. Measuring methane alongside hydrogen is advocated to reduce false‐negative studies, but the variability of methane production is unknown. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of high methane production on hydrogen excretion after ingesting lactulose, fructose, or lactose. METHODS: A retrospective audit was performed of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms who underwent BT. Following a low fermentable carbohydrate diet for 24‐h, a fasting BT before consuming 35 ml lactulose, 35 g fructose, or lactose in 200 ml water, followed by BT every 10–15 min for up to 3‐h, was performed. A positive test was defined as a ≥20 ppm rise of hydrogen or methane from baseline. A high methane producer had an initial reading of ≥5 ppm. Breath hydrogen and methane production were measured as area under the curve. Chi‐squared tests were used to compare proportions of those meeting the cut‐off criteria. RESULTS: Of patients, 26% (28/106) were high methane producers at their initial lactulose test. The test–retest repeatability of methane production was high, with the same methane production status before ingesting lactose in all (70/70) and before ingesting fructose in most (71/73). Methane production was highly variable during testing, with 38% (10/26) having ≥1 reading lower than baseline. Hydrogen produced by high or low methane producers did not differ (1528 [960–3645] ppm min vs 2375 [1810–3195] ppm min [P = 0.11]). Symptoms and breath test results were not positively related. CONCLUSION: The validity of including an increase of ≥20 ppm methane to identify carbohydrate malabsorption or small intestine bacterial overgrowth should be questioned due to the variability of readings during testing. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2019-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7144793/ /pubmed/32280765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12240 Text en © 2019 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Harvie, Ruth M
Tuck, Caroline J
Schultz, Michael
Evaluation of lactulose, lactose, and fructose breath testing in clinical practice: A focus on methane
title Evaluation of lactulose, lactose, and fructose breath testing in clinical practice: A focus on methane
title_full Evaluation of lactulose, lactose, and fructose breath testing in clinical practice: A focus on methane
title_fullStr Evaluation of lactulose, lactose, and fructose breath testing in clinical practice: A focus on methane
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of lactulose, lactose, and fructose breath testing in clinical practice: A focus on methane
title_short Evaluation of lactulose, lactose, and fructose breath testing in clinical practice: A focus on methane
title_sort evaluation of lactulose, lactose, and fructose breath testing in clinical practice: a focus on methane
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12240
work_keys_str_mv AT harvieruthm evaluationoflactuloselactoseandfructosebreathtestinginclinicalpracticeafocusonmethane
AT tuckcarolinej evaluationoflactuloselactoseandfructosebreathtestinginclinicalpracticeafocusonmethane
AT schultzmichael evaluationoflactuloselactoseandfructosebreathtestinginclinicalpracticeafocusonmethane