Cargando…
Current solutions for the treatment of chronic articular cartilage defects in the knee
Chondral and osteochondral defects in the knee are common and may lead to degenerative joint disease if treated inappropriately. Conventional treatments such as microfracture often result in fibrocartilage formation and are associated with inferior results. Additionally, microfracture is generally u...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32296549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190031 |
_version_ | 1783519898393116672 |
---|---|
author | Chimutengwende-Gordon, Mukai Donaldson, James Bentley, George |
author_facet | Chimutengwende-Gordon, Mukai Donaldson, James Bentley, George |
author_sort | Chimutengwende-Gordon, Mukai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chondral and osteochondral defects in the knee are common and may lead to degenerative joint disease if treated inappropriately. Conventional treatments such as microfracture often result in fibrocartilage formation and are associated with inferior results. Additionally, microfracture is generally unsuitable for the treatment of defects larger than 2–4 cm(2). The osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS) has been shown to produce superior clinical outcomes to microfracture but is technically difficult and may be associated with donor-site morbidity. Osteochondral allograft use is limited by graft availability and failure of cartilage incorporation is an issue. Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has been shown to result in repair with hyaline-like cartilage but involves a two-stage procedure and is relatively expensive. Rehabilitation after ACI takes 12 months, which is inconvenient and not feasible for athletic patients. Newer methods to regenerate cartilage include autologous stem cell transplantation, which may be performed as a single-stage procedure, can have a shorter rehabilitation period and is less expensive than ACI. Longer-term studies of these methods are needed. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:156-163. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190031 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7144889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71448892020-04-15 Current solutions for the treatment of chronic articular cartilage defects in the knee Chimutengwende-Gordon, Mukai Donaldson, James Bentley, George EFORT Open Rev Sports & Arthroscopy Chondral and osteochondral defects in the knee are common and may lead to degenerative joint disease if treated inappropriately. Conventional treatments such as microfracture often result in fibrocartilage formation and are associated with inferior results. Additionally, microfracture is generally unsuitable for the treatment of defects larger than 2–4 cm(2). The osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS) has been shown to produce superior clinical outcomes to microfracture but is technically difficult and may be associated with donor-site morbidity. Osteochondral allograft use is limited by graft availability and failure of cartilage incorporation is an issue. Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has been shown to result in repair with hyaline-like cartilage but involves a two-stage procedure and is relatively expensive. Rehabilitation after ACI takes 12 months, which is inconvenient and not feasible for athletic patients. Newer methods to regenerate cartilage include autologous stem cell transplantation, which may be performed as a single-stage procedure, can have a shorter rehabilitation period and is less expensive than ACI. Longer-term studies of these methods are needed. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:156-163. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190031 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2020-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7144889/ /pubmed/32296549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190031 Text en © 2020 The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed. |
spellingShingle | Sports & Arthroscopy Chimutengwende-Gordon, Mukai Donaldson, James Bentley, George Current solutions for the treatment of chronic articular cartilage defects in the knee |
title | Current solutions for the treatment of chronic articular cartilage defects in the knee |
title_full | Current solutions for the treatment of chronic articular cartilage defects in the knee |
title_fullStr | Current solutions for the treatment of chronic articular cartilage defects in the knee |
title_full_unstemmed | Current solutions for the treatment of chronic articular cartilage defects in the knee |
title_short | Current solutions for the treatment of chronic articular cartilage defects in the knee |
title_sort | current solutions for the treatment of chronic articular cartilage defects in the knee |
topic | Sports & Arthroscopy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7144889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32296549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chimutengwendegordonmukai currentsolutionsforthetreatmentofchronicarticularcartilagedefectsintheknee AT donaldsonjames currentsolutionsforthetreatmentofchronicarticularcartilagedefectsintheknee AT bentleygeorge currentsolutionsforthetreatmentofchronicarticularcartilagedefectsintheknee |