Cargando…

Long-Term Assessment of the Cecal Intubation Rates in High-Performing Colonoscopists: Time for Review

The cecal intubation rate (CIR) is one of the 3 priority indicators for quality in colonoscopy. Whether continuous measurement of CIR is useful in high performers is uncertain. METHODS: At an academic center, we identified 16 physicians who performed at least 50 procedures over 6 consecutive years....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vemulapalli, Krishna C., Wilder, Sarah W., Kahi, Charles J., Rex, Douglas K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7145034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32352718
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000153
_version_ 1783519931206205440
author Vemulapalli, Krishna C.
Wilder, Sarah W.
Kahi, Charles J.
Rex, Douglas K.
author_facet Vemulapalli, Krishna C.
Wilder, Sarah W.
Kahi, Charles J.
Rex, Douglas K.
author_sort Vemulapalli, Krishna C.
collection PubMed
description The cecal intubation rate (CIR) is one of the 3 priority indicators for quality in colonoscopy. Whether continuous measurement of CIR is useful in high performers is uncertain. METHODS: At an academic center, we identified 16 physicians who performed at least 50 procedures over 6 consecutive years. We analyzed all colonoscopy procedures excluding those with poor/inadequate preparation or severe colitis for CIR trend over the years. We calculated the numbers needed to establish CIR over minimum threshold levels with 95% confidence. RESULTS: The overall CIR was 99.4%. None of the 16 physicians had a CIR <96.6% in any year. Sensitivity analyses including patients without intent to reach the cecum and inadequate bowel preparation had little impact on the results. Overall cecal photo documentation rate was 98.4%. No significant correlation was observed between procedure volume at our center and CIR (σ = −0.196, P = 0.483). Physicians with CIR ≥99% need to have only 24 examinations reviewed to establish CIR is >95%. DISCUSSION: Continuous measurement of CIR, at least in high performers, appears to be of limited value. Very high performers need to evaluate small number of cases to demonstrate that CIR is above the recommended thresholds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7145034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71450342020-04-17 Long-Term Assessment of the Cecal Intubation Rates in High-Performing Colonoscopists: Time for Review Vemulapalli, Krishna C. Wilder, Sarah W. Kahi, Charles J. Rex, Douglas K. Clin Transl Gastroenterol Article The cecal intubation rate (CIR) is one of the 3 priority indicators for quality in colonoscopy. Whether continuous measurement of CIR is useful in high performers is uncertain. METHODS: At an academic center, we identified 16 physicians who performed at least 50 procedures over 6 consecutive years. We analyzed all colonoscopy procedures excluding those with poor/inadequate preparation or severe colitis for CIR trend over the years. We calculated the numbers needed to establish CIR over minimum threshold levels with 95% confidence. RESULTS: The overall CIR was 99.4%. None of the 16 physicians had a CIR <96.6% in any year. Sensitivity analyses including patients without intent to reach the cecum and inadequate bowel preparation had little impact on the results. Overall cecal photo documentation rate was 98.4%. No significant correlation was observed between procedure volume at our center and CIR (σ = −0.196, P = 0.483). Physicians with CIR ≥99% need to have only 24 examinations reviewed to establish CIR is >95%. DISCUSSION: Continuous measurement of CIR, at least in high performers, appears to be of limited value. Very high performers need to evaluate small number of cases to demonstrate that CIR is above the recommended thresholds. Wolters Kluwer 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7145034/ /pubmed/32352718 http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000153 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Vemulapalli, Krishna C.
Wilder, Sarah W.
Kahi, Charles J.
Rex, Douglas K.
Long-Term Assessment of the Cecal Intubation Rates in High-Performing Colonoscopists: Time for Review
title Long-Term Assessment of the Cecal Intubation Rates in High-Performing Colonoscopists: Time for Review
title_full Long-Term Assessment of the Cecal Intubation Rates in High-Performing Colonoscopists: Time for Review
title_fullStr Long-Term Assessment of the Cecal Intubation Rates in High-Performing Colonoscopists: Time for Review
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Assessment of the Cecal Intubation Rates in High-Performing Colonoscopists: Time for Review
title_short Long-Term Assessment of the Cecal Intubation Rates in High-Performing Colonoscopists: Time for Review
title_sort long-term assessment of the cecal intubation rates in high-performing colonoscopists: time for review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7145034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32352718
http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000153
work_keys_str_mv AT vemulapallikrishnac longtermassessmentofthececalintubationratesinhighperformingcolonoscopiststimeforreview
AT wildersarahw longtermassessmentofthececalintubationratesinhighperformingcolonoscopiststimeforreview
AT kahicharlesj longtermassessmentofthececalintubationratesinhighperformingcolonoscopiststimeforreview
AT rexdouglask longtermassessmentofthececalintubationratesinhighperformingcolonoscopiststimeforreview