Cargando…

The Biological Evaluation of Conventional and Nano-Hydroxyapatite-Silica Glass Ionomer Cement on Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: Despite their lower strength, glass ionomer cements (GICs) are widely used as restorative materials because of their anti-cariogenic properties, direct adhesion to tooth structure and good biocompatibility. Recently, the addition of nano-hydroxyapatite (nano-HA)-silica to conventional GI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hii, Siew Ching, Luddin, Norhayati, Kannan, Thirumulu Ponnuraj, Ab Rahman, Ismail, Nik Abdul Ghani, Nik Rozainah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7145261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308298
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_581_18
_version_ 1783519967852888064
author Hii, Siew Ching
Luddin, Norhayati
Kannan, Thirumulu Ponnuraj
Ab Rahman, Ismail
Nik Abdul Ghani, Nik Rozainah
author_facet Hii, Siew Ching
Luddin, Norhayati
Kannan, Thirumulu Ponnuraj
Ab Rahman, Ismail
Nik Abdul Ghani, Nik Rozainah
author_sort Hii, Siew Ching
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite their lower strength, glass ionomer cements (GICs) are widely used as restorative materials because of their anti-cariogenic properties, direct adhesion to tooth structure and good biocompatibility. Recently, the addition of nano-hydroxyapatite (nano-HA)-silica to conventional GIC (cGIC) has been shown to improve the strength of cGIC. However, the biocompatibility and cell attachment properties of this material are unknown. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity and cell attachment properties of cGIC and nano-HA-silica-GIC on dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Material extracts of nano-HA-silica-GIC and cGIC were prepared into seven serial dilutions and applied to 96 well plates seeded with DPSCs. After 72 h, the cell viability was determined using MTT assay. The DPSCs cell attachment properties were examined under scanning electron microscope (SEM) after 24 and 72 h. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyse the data for MTT assay (P < 0.05). SEM images of cell attachment properties were also described. RESULTS: Nano-HA-silica-GIC and cGIC was shown to be slight to non-cytotoxic at all concentrations, except 200 mg/ml. Moderate cytotoxicity has been observed at 200 mg/ml concentration where nano-HA-silica-GIC and cGIC revealed cell viability values of 44.38 and 42.15%, respectively. Nano-HA-silica-GIC demonstrated better cell viability values than cGIC at all concentrations except for 6.25 and 12.5 mg/ml. Nevertheless, the results were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). SEM examination revealed the increasing numbers of DPSCs attached to both groups with prominent filopodia, especially after 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: Nano-HA-silica-GIC exhibited good biocompatibility which is comparable to cGIC and favoured the attachment of DPSCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7145261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71452612020-04-17 The Biological Evaluation of Conventional and Nano-Hydroxyapatite-Silica Glass Ionomer Cement on Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Comparative Study Hii, Siew Ching Luddin, Norhayati Kannan, Thirumulu Ponnuraj Ab Rahman, Ismail Nik Abdul Ghani, Nik Rozainah Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Despite their lower strength, glass ionomer cements (GICs) are widely used as restorative materials because of their anti-cariogenic properties, direct adhesion to tooth structure and good biocompatibility. Recently, the addition of nano-hydroxyapatite (nano-HA)-silica to conventional GIC (cGIC) has been shown to improve the strength of cGIC. However, the biocompatibility and cell attachment properties of this material are unknown. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity and cell attachment properties of cGIC and nano-HA-silica-GIC on dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Material extracts of nano-HA-silica-GIC and cGIC were prepared into seven serial dilutions and applied to 96 well plates seeded with DPSCs. After 72 h, the cell viability was determined using MTT assay. The DPSCs cell attachment properties were examined under scanning electron microscope (SEM) after 24 and 72 h. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyse the data for MTT assay (P < 0.05). SEM images of cell attachment properties were also described. RESULTS: Nano-HA-silica-GIC and cGIC was shown to be slight to non-cytotoxic at all concentrations, except 200 mg/ml. Moderate cytotoxicity has been observed at 200 mg/ml concentration where nano-HA-silica-GIC and cGIC revealed cell viability values of 44.38 and 42.15%, respectively. Nano-HA-silica-GIC demonstrated better cell viability values than cGIC at all concentrations except for 6.25 and 12.5 mg/ml. Nevertheless, the results were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). SEM examination revealed the increasing numbers of DPSCs attached to both groups with prominent filopodia, especially after 72 h. CONCLUSIONS: Nano-HA-silica-GIC exhibited good biocompatibility which is comparable to cGIC and favoured the attachment of DPSCs. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC7145261/ /pubmed/32308298 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_581_18 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hii, Siew Ching
Luddin, Norhayati
Kannan, Thirumulu Ponnuraj
Ab Rahman, Ismail
Nik Abdul Ghani, Nik Rozainah
The Biological Evaluation of Conventional and Nano-Hydroxyapatite-Silica Glass Ionomer Cement on Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Comparative Study
title The Biological Evaluation of Conventional and Nano-Hydroxyapatite-Silica Glass Ionomer Cement on Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Comparative Study
title_full The Biological Evaluation of Conventional and Nano-Hydroxyapatite-Silica Glass Ionomer Cement on Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr The Biological Evaluation of Conventional and Nano-Hydroxyapatite-Silica Glass Ionomer Cement on Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed The Biological Evaluation of Conventional and Nano-Hydroxyapatite-Silica Glass Ionomer Cement on Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Comparative Study
title_short The Biological Evaluation of Conventional and Nano-Hydroxyapatite-Silica Glass Ionomer Cement on Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Comparative Study
title_sort biological evaluation of conventional and nano-hydroxyapatite-silica glass ionomer cement on dental pulp stem cells: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7145261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308298
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_581_18
work_keys_str_mv AT hiisiewching thebiologicalevaluationofconventionalandnanohydroxyapatitesilicaglassionomercementondentalpulpstemcellsacomparativestudy
AT luddinnorhayati thebiologicalevaluationofconventionalandnanohydroxyapatitesilicaglassionomercementondentalpulpstemcellsacomparativestudy
AT kannanthirumuluponnuraj thebiologicalevaluationofconventionalandnanohydroxyapatitesilicaglassionomercementondentalpulpstemcellsacomparativestudy
AT abrahmanismail thebiologicalevaluationofconventionalandnanohydroxyapatitesilicaglassionomercementondentalpulpstemcellsacomparativestudy
AT nikabdulghaninikrozainah thebiologicalevaluationofconventionalandnanohydroxyapatitesilicaglassionomercementondentalpulpstemcellsacomparativestudy
AT hiisiewching biologicalevaluationofconventionalandnanohydroxyapatitesilicaglassionomercementondentalpulpstemcellsacomparativestudy
AT luddinnorhayati biologicalevaluationofconventionalandnanohydroxyapatitesilicaglassionomercementondentalpulpstemcellsacomparativestudy
AT kannanthirumuluponnuraj biologicalevaluationofconventionalandnanohydroxyapatitesilicaglassionomercementondentalpulpstemcellsacomparativestudy
AT abrahmanismail biologicalevaluationofconventionalandnanohydroxyapatitesilicaglassionomercementondentalpulpstemcellsacomparativestudy
AT nikabdulghaninikrozainah biologicalevaluationofconventionalandnanohydroxyapatitesilicaglassionomercementondentalpulpstemcellsacomparativestudy