Cargando…

Screening for Cognitive Frailty Using Short Cognitive Screening Instruments: Comparison of the Chinese Versions of the MoCA and Qmci Screen

BACKGROUND: Cognitive frailty describes cognitive impairment associated with physical decline. Few studies have explored whether short cognitive screens identify frailty. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of the Chinese versions of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci-CN) screen and Montreal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Yangfan, Lin, Yangyang, Yi, Lingrong, Li, Zhao, Li, Xian, Yu, Yuying, Guo, Yuxiao, Wang, Yuling, Jiang, Haoying, Chen, Zhuoming, Svendrovski, Anton, Gao, Yang, Molloy, D. William, O’Caoimh, Rónán
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7145973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308636
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00558
_version_ 1783520097507213312
author Xu, Yangfan
Lin, Yangyang
Yi, Lingrong
Li, Zhao
Li, Xian
Yu, Yuying
Guo, Yuxiao
Wang, Yuling
Jiang, Haoying
Chen, Zhuoming
Svendrovski, Anton
Gao, Yang
Molloy, D. William
O’Caoimh, Rónán
author_facet Xu, Yangfan
Lin, Yangyang
Yi, Lingrong
Li, Zhao
Li, Xian
Yu, Yuying
Guo, Yuxiao
Wang, Yuling
Jiang, Haoying
Chen, Zhuoming
Svendrovski, Anton
Gao, Yang
Molloy, D. William
O’Caoimh, Rónán
author_sort Xu, Yangfan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cognitive frailty describes cognitive impairment associated with physical decline. Few studies have explored whether short cognitive screens identify frailty. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of the Chinese versions of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci-CN) screen and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-CN) in identifying cognitive frailty. METHODS: Ninety-five participants with cognitive symptoms [47 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 34 with subjective cognitive disorder, and 14 with dementia] were included from two outpatient rehabilitation clinics. Energy (work intensity) and physical activity levels were recorded. Cognitive frailty was diagnosed by an interdisciplinary team using the IANA/IAGG consensus criteria, stratified on the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Instruments were administered sequentially and randomly by trained assessors, blind to the diagnosis. RESULTS: The mean age of the sample was 62.6 ± 10.2 years; median CFS score was 4 ± 1 and 36 (38%) were cognitively frail. The Qmci-CN had similar accuracy in differentiating the non-frail from cognitively frail compared to the MoCA-CN, AUC 0.82 versus 0.74, respectively (p = 0.19). At its optimal cut-off (≤55/100), the Qmci-CN provided a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 67% versus 91% and 51%, respectively, for the MoCA-CN (≤23/30). Neither was accurate in separating MCI from cognitive frailty but both accurately separated cognitive frailty from dementia. CONCLUSION: Established short cognitive screens may be useful in identifying cognitive frailty in Chinese adults with cognitive complaints but not in separating MCI from cognitive frailty. The Qmci-CN had similar accuracy to the MoCA-CN and a shorter administration time in this small and under-powered study, necessitating the need for adequately powered studies in different healthcare settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7145973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71459732020-04-18 Screening for Cognitive Frailty Using Short Cognitive Screening Instruments: Comparison of the Chinese Versions of the MoCA and Qmci Screen Xu, Yangfan Lin, Yangyang Yi, Lingrong Li, Zhao Li, Xian Yu, Yuying Guo, Yuxiao Wang, Yuling Jiang, Haoying Chen, Zhuoming Svendrovski, Anton Gao, Yang Molloy, D. William O’Caoimh, Rónán Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND: Cognitive frailty describes cognitive impairment associated with physical decline. Few studies have explored whether short cognitive screens identify frailty. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of the Chinese versions of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci-CN) screen and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-CN) in identifying cognitive frailty. METHODS: Ninety-five participants with cognitive symptoms [47 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 34 with subjective cognitive disorder, and 14 with dementia] were included from two outpatient rehabilitation clinics. Energy (work intensity) and physical activity levels were recorded. Cognitive frailty was diagnosed by an interdisciplinary team using the IANA/IAGG consensus criteria, stratified on the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Instruments were administered sequentially and randomly by trained assessors, blind to the diagnosis. RESULTS: The mean age of the sample was 62.6 ± 10.2 years; median CFS score was 4 ± 1 and 36 (38%) were cognitively frail. The Qmci-CN had similar accuracy in differentiating the non-frail from cognitively frail compared to the MoCA-CN, AUC 0.82 versus 0.74, respectively (p = 0.19). At its optimal cut-off (≤55/100), the Qmci-CN provided a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 67% versus 91% and 51%, respectively, for the MoCA-CN (≤23/30). Neither was accurate in separating MCI from cognitive frailty but both accurately separated cognitive frailty from dementia. CONCLUSION: Established short cognitive screens may be useful in identifying cognitive frailty in Chinese adults with cognitive complaints but not in separating MCI from cognitive frailty. The Qmci-CN had similar accuracy to the MoCA-CN and a shorter administration time in this small and under-powered study, necessitating the need for adequately powered studies in different healthcare settings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7145973/ /pubmed/32308636 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00558 Text en Copyright © 2020 Xu, Lin, Yi, Li, Li, Yu, Guo, Wang, Jiang, Chen, Svendrovski, Gao, Molloy and O’Caoimh. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Xu, Yangfan
Lin, Yangyang
Yi, Lingrong
Li, Zhao
Li, Xian
Yu, Yuying
Guo, Yuxiao
Wang, Yuling
Jiang, Haoying
Chen, Zhuoming
Svendrovski, Anton
Gao, Yang
Molloy, D. William
O’Caoimh, Rónán
Screening for Cognitive Frailty Using Short Cognitive Screening Instruments: Comparison of the Chinese Versions of the MoCA and Qmci Screen
title Screening for Cognitive Frailty Using Short Cognitive Screening Instruments: Comparison of the Chinese Versions of the MoCA and Qmci Screen
title_full Screening for Cognitive Frailty Using Short Cognitive Screening Instruments: Comparison of the Chinese Versions of the MoCA and Qmci Screen
title_fullStr Screening for Cognitive Frailty Using Short Cognitive Screening Instruments: Comparison of the Chinese Versions of the MoCA and Qmci Screen
title_full_unstemmed Screening for Cognitive Frailty Using Short Cognitive Screening Instruments: Comparison of the Chinese Versions of the MoCA and Qmci Screen
title_short Screening for Cognitive Frailty Using Short Cognitive Screening Instruments: Comparison of the Chinese Versions of the MoCA and Qmci Screen
title_sort screening for cognitive frailty using short cognitive screening instruments: comparison of the chinese versions of the moca and qmci screen
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7145973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32308636
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00558
work_keys_str_mv AT xuyangfan screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen
AT linyangyang screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen
AT yilingrong screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen
AT lizhao screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen
AT lixian screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen
AT yuyuying screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen
AT guoyuxiao screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen
AT wangyuling screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen
AT jianghaoying screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen
AT chenzhuoming screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen
AT svendrovskianton screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen
AT gaoyang screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen
AT molloydwilliam screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen
AT ocaoimhronan screeningforcognitivefrailtyusingshortcognitivescreeninginstrumentscomparisonofthechineseversionsofthemocaandqmciscreen