Cargando…

Evaluation of Intussusception After Oral Monovalent Rotavirus Vaccination in South Africa

BACKGROUND: Postlicensure studies have shown an association between rotavirus vaccination and intussusception. We assessed the risk of intussusception associated with Rotarix (RV1) administration, at 6 and 14 weeks of age, in an upper-middle-income country, South Africa. METHODS: Active prospective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Groome, Michelle J, Tate, Jacqueline E, Arnold, Marion, Chitnis, Milind, Cox, Sharon, de Vos, Corné, Kirsten, Mari, le Grange, Susanna M, Loveland, Jerome, Machaea, Sello, Maharaj, Ashwini, Andrews, Nick, Madhi, Shabir A, Parashar, Umesh D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7146001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz431
_version_ 1783520103043694592
author Groome, Michelle J
Tate, Jacqueline E
Arnold, Marion
Chitnis, Milind
Cox, Sharon
de Vos, Corné
Kirsten, Mari
le Grange, Susanna M
Loveland, Jerome
Machaea, Sello
Maharaj, Ashwini
Andrews, Nick
Madhi, Shabir A
Parashar, Umesh D
author_facet Groome, Michelle J
Tate, Jacqueline E
Arnold, Marion
Chitnis, Milind
Cox, Sharon
de Vos, Corné
Kirsten, Mari
le Grange, Susanna M
Loveland, Jerome
Machaea, Sello
Maharaj, Ashwini
Andrews, Nick
Madhi, Shabir A
Parashar, Umesh D
author_sort Groome, Michelle J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postlicensure studies have shown an association between rotavirus vaccination and intussusception. We assessed the risk of intussusception associated with Rotarix (RV1) administration, at 6 and 14 weeks of age, in an upper-middle-income country, South Africa. METHODS: Active prospective surveillance for intussusception was conducted in 8 hospitals from September 2013 through December 2017. Retrospective case enrollment was done at 1 hospital from July 2012 through August 2013. Demographic characteristics, symptom onset, and rotavirus vaccine status were ascertained. Using the self-controlled case-series method, we estimated age-adjusted incidence rate ratios within 1–7, 8–21, and 1–21 days of rotavirus vaccination in children aged 28–275 days at onset of symptoms. In addition, age-matched controls were enrolled for a subset of cases (n = 169), and a secondary analysis was performed. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-six cases were included in the case-series analysis. Post–dose 1, there were zero intussusception cases within 1–7 days, and 5 cases within 8–21 days of vaccination. Post–dose 2, 15 cases occurred within 1–7 days, and 18 cases within 8–21 days of vaccination. There was no increased risk of intussusception 1–7 days after dose 1 (no cases observed) or dose 2 (relative incidence [RI], 1.71 [95% confidence interval {CI} .83–3.01]). Similarly, there was no increased risk 8–21 days after the first (RI, 4.01 [95% CI, .87–10.56]) or second dose (RI, .96 [95% CI, .52–1.60]). Results were similar for the case-control analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of intussusception in the 21 days after the first or second dose of RV1 was not higher than the background risk among South Africa infants. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: South African National Clinical Trial Register (DOH-27-0913-4183).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7146001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71460012020-04-15 Evaluation of Intussusception After Oral Monovalent Rotavirus Vaccination in South Africa Groome, Michelle J Tate, Jacqueline E Arnold, Marion Chitnis, Milind Cox, Sharon de Vos, Corné Kirsten, Mari le Grange, Susanna M Loveland, Jerome Machaea, Sello Maharaj, Ashwini Andrews, Nick Madhi, Shabir A Parashar, Umesh D Clin Infect Dis Articles and Commentaries BACKGROUND: Postlicensure studies have shown an association between rotavirus vaccination and intussusception. We assessed the risk of intussusception associated with Rotarix (RV1) administration, at 6 and 14 weeks of age, in an upper-middle-income country, South Africa. METHODS: Active prospective surveillance for intussusception was conducted in 8 hospitals from September 2013 through December 2017. Retrospective case enrollment was done at 1 hospital from July 2012 through August 2013. Demographic characteristics, symptom onset, and rotavirus vaccine status were ascertained. Using the self-controlled case-series method, we estimated age-adjusted incidence rate ratios within 1–7, 8–21, and 1–21 days of rotavirus vaccination in children aged 28–275 days at onset of symptoms. In addition, age-matched controls were enrolled for a subset of cases (n = 169), and a secondary analysis was performed. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-six cases were included in the case-series analysis. Post–dose 1, there were zero intussusception cases within 1–7 days, and 5 cases within 8–21 days of vaccination. Post–dose 2, 15 cases occurred within 1–7 days, and 18 cases within 8–21 days of vaccination. There was no increased risk of intussusception 1–7 days after dose 1 (no cases observed) or dose 2 (relative incidence [RI], 1.71 [95% confidence interval {CI} .83–3.01]). Similarly, there was no increased risk 8–21 days after the first (RI, 4.01 [95% CI, .87–10.56]) or second dose (RI, .96 [95% CI, .52–1.60]). Results were similar for the case-control analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of intussusception in the 21 days after the first or second dose of RV1 was not higher than the background risk among South Africa infants. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: South African National Clinical Trial Register (DOH-27-0913-4183). Oxford University Press 2020-04-15 2019-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7146001/ /pubmed/31125061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz431 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles and Commentaries
Groome, Michelle J
Tate, Jacqueline E
Arnold, Marion
Chitnis, Milind
Cox, Sharon
de Vos, Corné
Kirsten, Mari
le Grange, Susanna M
Loveland, Jerome
Machaea, Sello
Maharaj, Ashwini
Andrews, Nick
Madhi, Shabir A
Parashar, Umesh D
Evaluation of Intussusception After Oral Monovalent Rotavirus Vaccination in South Africa
title Evaluation of Intussusception After Oral Monovalent Rotavirus Vaccination in South Africa
title_full Evaluation of Intussusception After Oral Monovalent Rotavirus Vaccination in South Africa
title_fullStr Evaluation of Intussusception After Oral Monovalent Rotavirus Vaccination in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Intussusception After Oral Monovalent Rotavirus Vaccination in South Africa
title_short Evaluation of Intussusception After Oral Monovalent Rotavirus Vaccination in South Africa
title_sort evaluation of intussusception after oral monovalent rotavirus vaccination in south africa
topic Articles and Commentaries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7146001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz431
work_keys_str_mv AT groomemichellej evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT tatejacquelinee evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT arnoldmarion evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT chitnismilind evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT coxsharon evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT devoscorne evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT kirstenmari evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT legrangesusannam evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT lovelandjerome evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT machaeasello evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT maharajashwini evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT andrewsnick evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT madhishabira evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT parasharumeshd evaluationofintussusceptionafteroralmonovalentrotavirusvaccinationinsouthafrica