Cargando…

Comparison of Electromechanical Delay during Ventricular Tachycardia and Fibrillation under Different Conductivity Conditions Using Computational Modeling

Electromechanical delay (EMD) is the time interval between local myocyte depolarization and the onset of myofiber shortening. Previously, researchers measured EMD during sinus rhythm and ectopic pacing in normal and heart failure conditions. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports regarding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heikhmakhtiar, Aulia K., Lim, Ki M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7146094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32300375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9501985
_version_ 1783520119991828480
author Heikhmakhtiar, Aulia K.
Lim, Ki M.
author_facet Heikhmakhtiar, Aulia K.
Lim, Ki M.
author_sort Heikhmakhtiar, Aulia K.
collection PubMed
description Electromechanical delay (EMD) is the time interval between local myocyte depolarization and the onset of myofiber shortening. Previously, researchers measured EMD during sinus rhythm and ectopic pacing in normal and heart failure conditions. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports regarding EMD during another type of rhythms or arrhythmia. The goal of this study was to quantify EMD during sinus rhythm, tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation conditions. We hypothesized that EMD under sinus rhythm is longer due to isovolumetric contraction which is imprecise during arrhythmia. We used a realistic model of 3D electromechanical ventricles. During sinus rhythm, EMD was measured in the last cycle of cardiac systole under steady conditions. EMD under tachycardia and fibrillation conditions was measured during the entire simulation, resulting in multiple EMD values. We assessed EMD for the following 3 conduction velocities (CVs): 31 cm/s, 51 cm/s, and 69 cm/s. The average EMD during fibrillation condition was the shortest corresponding to 53.45 ms, 55.07 ms, and 50.77 ms, for the CVs of 31 cm/s, 51 cm/s, and 69 cm/s, respectively. The average EMD during tachycardia was 58.61 ms, 58.33 ms, and 52.50 ms for the three CVs. Under sinus rhythm with action potential duration restitution (APDR) slope 0.7, the average EMD was 66.35 ms, 66.41 ms, and 66.60 ms in line with the three CVs. This result supports our hypothesis that EMD under sinus rhythm is longer than that under tachyarrhythmia conditions. In conclusion, this study observed and quantified EMD under tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation conditions. This simulation study has widened our understanding of EMD in 3D ventricles under chaotic conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7146094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71460942020-04-16 Comparison of Electromechanical Delay during Ventricular Tachycardia and Fibrillation under Different Conductivity Conditions Using Computational Modeling Heikhmakhtiar, Aulia K. Lim, Ki M. Comput Math Methods Med Research Article Electromechanical delay (EMD) is the time interval between local myocyte depolarization and the onset of myofiber shortening. Previously, researchers measured EMD during sinus rhythm and ectopic pacing in normal and heart failure conditions. However, to our knowledge, there are no reports regarding EMD during another type of rhythms or arrhythmia. The goal of this study was to quantify EMD during sinus rhythm, tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation conditions. We hypothesized that EMD under sinus rhythm is longer due to isovolumetric contraction which is imprecise during arrhythmia. We used a realistic model of 3D electromechanical ventricles. During sinus rhythm, EMD was measured in the last cycle of cardiac systole under steady conditions. EMD under tachycardia and fibrillation conditions was measured during the entire simulation, resulting in multiple EMD values. We assessed EMD for the following 3 conduction velocities (CVs): 31 cm/s, 51 cm/s, and 69 cm/s. The average EMD during fibrillation condition was the shortest corresponding to 53.45 ms, 55.07 ms, and 50.77 ms, for the CVs of 31 cm/s, 51 cm/s, and 69 cm/s, respectively. The average EMD during tachycardia was 58.61 ms, 58.33 ms, and 52.50 ms for the three CVs. Under sinus rhythm with action potential duration restitution (APDR) slope 0.7, the average EMD was 66.35 ms, 66.41 ms, and 66.60 ms in line with the three CVs. This result supports our hypothesis that EMD under sinus rhythm is longer than that under tachyarrhythmia conditions. In conclusion, this study observed and quantified EMD under tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation conditions. This simulation study has widened our understanding of EMD in 3D ventricles under chaotic conditions. Hindawi 2020-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7146094/ /pubmed/32300375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9501985 Text en Copyright © 2020 Aulia K. Heikhmakhtiar and Ki M. Lim. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heikhmakhtiar, Aulia K.
Lim, Ki M.
Comparison of Electromechanical Delay during Ventricular Tachycardia and Fibrillation under Different Conductivity Conditions Using Computational Modeling
title Comparison of Electromechanical Delay during Ventricular Tachycardia and Fibrillation under Different Conductivity Conditions Using Computational Modeling
title_full Comparison of Electromechanical Delay during Ventricular Tachycardia and Fibrillation under Different Conductivity Conditions Using Computational Modeling
title_fullStr Comparison of Electromechanical Delay during Ventricular Tachycardia and Fibrillation under Different Conductivity Conditions Using Computational Modeling
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Electromechanical Delay during Ventricular Tachycardia and Fibrillation under Different Conductivity Conditions Using Computational Modeling
title_short Comparison of Electromechanical Delay during Ventricular Tachycardia and Fibrillation under Different Conductivity Conditions Using Computational Modeling
title_sort comparison of electromechanical delay during ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation under different conductivity conditions using computational modeling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7146094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32300375
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9501985
work_keys_str_mv AT heikhmakhtiarauliak comparisonofelectromechanicaldelayduringventriculartachycardiaandfibrillationunderdifferentconductivityconditionsusingcomputationalmodeling
AT limkim comparisonofelectromechanicaldelayduringventriculartachycardiaandfibrillationunderdifferentconductivityconditionsusingcomputationalmodeling