Cargando…

A review of the Royal Perth Hospital Bali experience: an infection control perspective

Thirty five patients were transferred to Royal Perth Hospital (RPH) after the Bali bombings. The patients had severe burn injuries and were considered to be at high-risk of both the carriage and acquisition of multi-resistant organisms (MROs). Whilst seeking to protect the Bali patients with a compr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heath, Christopher H, Orrell, C Terri, Lee, Rosie CE, Pearman, John W, McCullough, Cheryll, Christiansen, Keryn J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7146777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32288537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/HI03043
_version_ 1783520279706730496
author Heath, Christopher H
Orrell, C Terri
Lee, Rosie CE
Pearman, John W
McCullough, Cheryll
Christiansen, Keryn J
author_facet Heath, Christopher H
Orrell, C Terri
Lee, Rosie CE
Pearman, John W
McCullough, Cheryll
Christiansen, Keryn J
author_sort Heath, Christopher H
collection PubMed
description Thirty five patients were transferred to Royal Perth Hospital (RPH) after the Bali bombings. The patients had severe burn injuries and were considered to be at high-risk of both the carriage and acquisition of multi-resistant organisms (MROs). Whilst seeking to protect the Bali patients with a comprehensive infection control response, we also sought to protect other high-risk patients from nosocomial acquisition of MROs. MROs were detected from 25 (82%) of the 29 Bali patients admitted to RPH. Bali patients were colonised, or infected, with one or more of the following MROs: multi-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB) (19 patients), extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) producing Gram-negative bacteria (15 patients), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) (nine patients), multi-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MRPA) (six patients), multi-resistant Chryseobacterium sp. (four patients), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (three patients). Five Bali patients developed a total of eight bacteraemic episodes, with MRPA sepsis contributing to death in two patients. Since the Bali bombings horizontal transmission of Bali MROs has occurred in 41 non-Bali patients in RPH. MRPA has had the greatest clinical impact. Eight non-Bali patients developed a total of 11 bacteraemic episodes, with MRPA sepsis contributing to death in four patients. However, apart from MRPA, we have now controlled transmission of the other MROs in RPH. The emergency response to the Bali disaster required strong leadership, good communication and multi-disciplinary teamwork. The infection control strategy contributed to good outcomes for most Bali bombing patients. However, many patients within the Bali cohort were heavily colonised with MROs, and some developed invasive infection. Subsequent nosocomial transmission of these MROs to non-Bali patients has been a legacy of the Bali tragedy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7146777
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71467772020-04-10 A review of the Royal Perth Hospital Bali experience: an infection control perspective Heath, Christopher H Orrell, C Terri Lee, Rosie CE Pearman, John W McCullough, Cheryll Christiansen, Keryn J Aust Infect Control Article Thirty five patients were transferred to Royal Perth Hospital (RPH) after the Bali bombings. The patients had severe burn injuries and were considered to be at high-risk of both the carriage and acquisition of multi-resistant organisms (MROs). Whilst seeking to protect the Bali patients with a comprehensive infection control response, we also sought to protect other high-risk patients from nosocomial acquisition of MROs. MROs were detected from 25 (82%) of the 29 Bali patients admitted to RPH. Bali patients were colonised, or infected, with one or more of the following MROs: multi-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB) (19 patients), extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) producing Gram-negative bacteria (15 patients), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) (nine patients), multi-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MRPA) (six patients), multi-resistant Chryseobacterium sp. (four patients), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (three patients). Five Bali patients developed a total of eight bacteraemic episodes, with MRPA sepsis contributing to death in two patients. Since the Bali bombings horizontal transmission of Bali MROs has occurred in 41 non-Bali patients in RPH. MRPA has had the greatest clinical impact. Eight non-Bali patients developed a total of 11 bacteraemic episodes, with MRPA sepsis contributing to death in four patients. However, apart from MRPA, we have now controlled transmission of the other MROs in RPH. The emergency response to the Bali disaster required strong leadership, good communication and multi-disciplinary teamwork. The infection control strategy contributed to good outcomes for most Bali bombing patients. However, many patients within the Bali cohort were heavily colonised with MROs, and some developed invasive infection. Subsequent nosocomial transmission of these MROs to non-Bali patients has been a legacy of the Bali tragedy. Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2003-06 2016-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7146777/ /pubmed/32288537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/HI03043 Text en © 2003 Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Heath, Christopher H
Orrell, C Terri
Lee, Rosie CE
Pearman, John W
McCullough, Cheryll
Christiansen, Keryn J
A review of the Royal Perth Hospital Bali experience: an infection control perspective
title A review of the Royal Perth Hospital Bali experience: an infection control perspective
title_full A review of the Royal Perth Hospital Bali experience: an infection control perspective
title_fullStr A review of the Royal Perth Hospital Bali experience: an infection control perspective
title_full_unstemmed A review of the Royal Perth Hospital Bali experience: an infection control perspective
title_short A review of the Royal Perth Hospital Bali experience: an infection control perspective
title_sort review of the royal perth hospital bali experience: an infection control perspective
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7146777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32288537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/HI03043
work_keys_str_mv AT heathchristopherh areviewoftheroyalperthhospitalbaliexperienceaninfectioncontrolperspective
AT orrellcterri areviewoftheroyalperthhospitalbaliexperienceaninfectioncontrolperspective
AT leerosiece areviewoftheroyalperthhospitalbaliexperienceaninfectioncontrolperspective
AT pearmanjohnw areviewoftheroyalperthhospitalbaliexperienceaninfectioncontrolperspective
AT mcculloughcheryll areviewoftheroyalperthhospitalbaliexperienceaninfectioncontrolperspective
AT christiansenkerynj areviewoftheroyalperthhospitalbaliexperienceaninfectioncontrolperspective
AT heathchristopherh reviewoftheroyalperthhospitalbaliexperienceaninfectioncontrolperspective
AT orrellcterri reviewoftheroyalperthhospitalbaliexperienceaninfectioncontrolperspective
AT leerosiece reviewoftheroyalperthhospitalbaliexperienceaninfectioncontrolperspective
AT pearmanjohnw reviewoftheroyalperthhospitalbaliexperienceaninfectioncontrolperspective
AT mcculloughcheryll reviewoftheroyalperthhospitalbaliexperienceaninfectioncontrolperspective
AT christiansenkerynj reviewoftheroyalperthhospitalbaliexperienceaninfectioncontrolperspective