Cargando…

First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial

BACKGROUND: The ‘first pass effect’ (FPE), which was originally described with stent retrievers, designates a (near-)complete revascularization obtained after a single device pass with no rescue therapy, and is associated with improved clinical outcome and decreased mortality. OBJECTIVE: We report t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ducroux, Célina, Piotin, Michel, Gory, Benjamin, Labreuche, Julien, Blanc, Raphael, Ben Maacha, Malek, Lapergue, Bertrand, Fahed, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7146919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31471527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015215
_version_ 1783520312934006784
author Ducroux, Célina
Piotin, Michel
Gory, Benjamin
Labreuche, Julien
Blanc, Raphael
Ben Maacha, Malek
Lapergue, Bertrand
Fahed, Robert
author_facet Ducroux, Célina
Piotin, Michel
Gory, Benjamin
Labreuche, Julien
Blanc, Raphael
Ben Maacha, Malek
Lapergue, Bertrand
Fahed, Robert
author_sort Ducroux, Célina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ‘first pass effect’ (FPE), which was originally described with stent retrievers, designates a (near-)complete revascularization obtained after a single device pass with no rescue therapy, and is associated with improved clinical outcome and decreased mortality. OBJECTIVE: We report the rate and benefits of FPE in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ASTER is a randomized trial comparing angiographic revascularization with the stent retriever (SR) and contact aspiration (CA) thrombectomy techniques, assessed by an external core laboratory using the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scale. Rates of FPE (defined by mTICI 2c/3 after a single pass with no rescue therapy) were compared between patients treated with SR and CA techniques. Outcomes were compared between FPE-SR and FPE-CA patients, and between FPE and non-FPE patients. RESULTS: FPE was achieved in 97/336 patients (28.9%), with no significant difference between SR and CA (respectively 53/169 patients (31.3%) vs 44/167 patients (26.3%), adjusted RR for CA versus SR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.31; p=0.44). After prespecified adjustment for allocated arm and randomization stratification factors, FPE in patients was associated with a significantly improved clinical outcome and a decreased mortality, and a significantly lower rate of hemorrhagic transformation and procedural complications than in non-FPE patients. CONCLUSION: In the ASTER trial, similar rates of FPE were achieved with SR and CA, and FPE was associated with a significantly improved outcome. New techniques and devices to improve the rate of FPE are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Unique identifier: NCT02523261.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7146919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71469192020-04-15 First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial Ducroux, Célina Piotin, Michel Gory, Benjamin Labreuche, Julien Blanc, Raphael Ben Maacha, Malek Lapergue, Bertrand Fahed, Robert J Neurointerv Surg Ischemic Stroke BACKGROUND: The ‘first pass effect’ (FPE), which was originally described with stent retrievers, designates a (near-)complete revascularization obtained after a single device pass with no rescue therapy, and is associated with improved clinical outcome and decreased mortality. OBJECTIVE: We report the rate and benefits of FPE in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ASTER is a randomized trial comparing angiographic revascularization with the stent retriever (SR) and contact aspiration (CA) thrombectomy techniques, assessed by an external core laboratory using the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scale. Rates of FPE (defined by mTICI 2c/3 after a single pass with no rescue therapy) were compared between patients treated with SR and CA techniques. Outcomes were compared between FPE-SR and FPE-CA patients, and between FPE and non-FPE patients. RESULTS: FPE was achieved in 97/336 patients (28.9%), with no significant difference between SR and CA (respectively 53/169 patients (31.3%) vs 44/167 patients (26.3%), adjusted RR for CA versus SR 0.84, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.31; p=0.44). After prespecified adjustment for allocated arm and randomization stratification factors, FPE in patients was associated with a significantly improved clinical outcome and a decreased mortality, and a significantly lower rate of hemorrhagic transformation and procedural complications than in non-FPE patients. CONCLUSION: In the ASTER trial, similar rates of FPE were achieved with SR and CA, and FPE was associated with a significantly improved outcome. New techniques and devices to improve the rate of FPE are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Unique identifier: NCT02523261. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-04 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7146919/ /pubmed/31471527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015215 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ischemic Stroke
Ducroux, Célina
Piotin, Michel
Gory, Benjamin
Labreuche, Julien
Blanc, Raphael
Ben Maacha, Malek
Lapergue, Bertrand
Fahed, Robert
First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial
title First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial
title_full First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial
title_fullStr First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial
title_full_unstemmed First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial
title_short First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial
title_sort first pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the aspiration versus stent retriever (aster) trial
topic Ischemic Stroke
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7146919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31471527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015215
work_keys_str_mv AT ducrouxcelina firstpasseffectwithcontactaspirationandstentretrieversintheaspirationversusstentretrieverastertrial
AT piotinmichel firstpasseffectwithcontactaspirationandstentretrieversintheaspirationversusstentretrieverastertrial
AT gorybenjamin firstpasseffectwithcontactaspirationandstentretrieversintheaspirationversusstentretrieverastertrial
AT labreuchejulien firstpasseffectwithcontactaspirationandstentretrieversintheaspirationversusstentretrieverastertrial
AT blancraphael firstpasseffectwithcontactaspirationandstentretrieversintheaspirationversusstentretrieverastertrial
AT benmaachamalek firstpasseffectwithcontactaspirationandstentretrieversintheaspirationversusstentretrieverastertrial
AT laperguebertrand firstpasseffectwithcontactaspirationandstentretrieversintheaspirationversusstentretrieverastertrial
AT fahedrobert firstpasseffectwithcontactaspirationandstentretrieversintheaspirationversusstentretrieverastertrial
AT firstpasseffectwithcontactaspirationandstentretrieversintheaspirationversusstentretrieverastertrial