Cargando…

Development and Psychometric Validation of the Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale

Introduction: Anxiety in dogs, especially in relation to certain noises, is a common issue which can lead to clinically significant problems like noise phobias. While several scales have been used to assess sound sensitivity and reactivity, clinical monitoring has tended to depend on unvalidated met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mills, Daniel S., Mueller, Hanns Walter, McPeake, Kevin, Engel, Odilo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7146976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00171
_version_ 1783520325903843328
author Mills, Daniel S.
Mueller, Hanns Walter
McPeake, Kevin
Engel, Odilo
author_facet Mills, Daniel S.
Mueller, Hanns Walter
McPeake, Kevin
Engel, Odilo
author_sort Mills, Daniel S.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Anxiety in dogs, especially in relation to certain noises, is a common issue which can lead to clinically significant problems like noise phobias. While several scales have been used to assess sound sensitivity and reactivity, clinical monitoring has tended to depend on unvalidated methods, general assessment, and/or historical comparison with owners' recall of previous episodes. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate a scale to assess canine anxiety. Materials and Methods: We used the data from 226 dogs from a previously reported double blind placebo controlled study in order to determine the validity of the 16 item “Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale.” Unidimensionality was assessed through correlation between individual item scores and total score, with internal consistency assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Factor analysis was used to determine the dimensionality of the scale. Item response theory (IRT) was used to gain insight into the value of single items to the overall scale scores. To characterize the score characteristics in an anxiety-eliciting context we analyzed the behaviors of placebo treated dogs assessed at 00:20 h, the time point of maximum noise stimulus during New Year's Eve fireworks. Sensitivity of the scale to treatment effects was determined from its performance in the wider study. Results: The majority of correlations between individual items and total score were >0.48, with Cronbach's alpha equalling 0.88, indicating good internal consistency. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) confirmed a unidimensional structure. IRT indicated that the scale could be reduced to 11 items without significantly reducing its value. The scale showed good treatment and stimulus sensitivity, with a score change of ~20 points differentiating “no/worse” effect from an “excellent” effect and a 30% difference between treatment (imepitoin) and placebo. Conclusion: In our initial validation the Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale appears to provide a reliable method for determining anxiety and fear responses by dogs and monitoring the effects of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7146976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71469762020-04-21 Development and Psychometric Validation of the Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale Mills, Daniel S. Mueller, Hanns Walter McPeake, Kevin Engel, Odilo Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Introduction: Anxiety in dogs, especially in relation to certain noises, is a common issue which can lead to clinically significant problems like noise phobias. While several scales have been used to assess sound sensitivity and reactivity, clinical monitoring has tended to depend on unvalidated methods, general assessment, and/or historical comparison with owners' recall of previous episodes. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate a scale to assess canine anxiety. Materials and Methods: We used the data from 226 dogs from a previously reported double blind placebo controlled study in order to determine the validity of the 16 item “Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale.” Unidimensionality was assessed through correlation between individual item scores and total score, with internal consistency assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Factor analysis was used to determine the dimensionality of the scale. Item response theory (IRT) was used to gain insight into the value of single items to the overall scale scores. To characterize the score characteristics in an anxiety-eliciting context we analyzed the behaviors of placebo treated dogs assessed at 00:20 h, the time point of maximum noise stimulus during New Year's Eve fireworks. Sensitivity of the scale to treatment effects was determined from its performance in the wider study. Results: The majority of correlations between individual items and total score were >0.48, with Cronbach's alpha equalling 0.88, indicating good internal consistency. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) confirmed a unidimensional structure. IRT indicated that the scale could be reduced to 11 items without significantly reducing its value. The scale showed good treatment and stimulus sensitivity, with a score change of ~20 points differentiating “no/worse” effect from an “excellent” effect and a 30% difference between treatment (imepitoin) and placebo. Conclusion: In our initial validation the Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale appears to provide a reliable method for determining anxiety and fear responses by dogs and monitoring the effects of treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7146976/ /pubmed/32318590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00171 Text en Copyright © 2020 Mills, Mueller, McPeake and Engel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Mills, Daniel S.
Mueller, Hanns Walter
McPeake, Kevin
Engel, Odilo
Development and Psychometric Validation of the Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale
title Development and Psychometric Validation of the Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale
title_full Development and Psychometric Validation of the Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale
title_fullStr Development and Psychometric Validation of the Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale
title_full_unstemmed Development and Psychometric Validation of the Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale
title_short Development and Psychometric Validation of the Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale
title_sort development and psychometric validation of the lincoln canine anxiety scale
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7146976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32318590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00171
work_keys_str_mv AT millsdaniels developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthelincolncanineanxietyscale
AT muellerhannswalter developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthelincolncanineanxietyscale
AT mcpeakekevin developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthelincolncanineanxietyscale
AT engelodilo developmentandpsychometricvalidationofthelincolncanineanxietyscale