Cargando…

Valuing the cost of improving Chilean primary vaccination: a cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine

BACKGROUND: The phased withdrawal of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and the introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) is central to the polio ‘end-game’ strategy. METHODS: We analyzed the cost implications in Chile of a switch from the vaccination scheme consisting of a pentavalent vaccine with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olivera, Ignacio, Grau, Carlos, Dibarboure, Hugo, Torres, Juan Pablo, Mieres, Gustavo, Lazarov, Luis, Alvarez, Fabián P., Yescas, Juan Guillermo López
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32272920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05115-7
_version_ 1783520333655965696
author Olivera, Ignacio
Grau, Carlos
Dibarboure, Hugo
Torres, Juan Pablo
Mieres, Gustavo
Lazarov, Luis
Alvarez, Fabián P.
Yescas, Juan Guillermo López
author_facet Olivera, Ignacio
Grau, Carlos
Dibarboure, Hugo
Torres, Juan Pablo
Mieres, Gustavo
Lazarov, Luis
Alvarez, Fabián P.
Yescas, Juan Guillermo López
author_sort Olivera, Ignacio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The phased withdrawal of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and the introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) is central to the polio ‘end-game’ strategy. METHODS: We analyzed the cost implications in Chile of a switch from the vaccination scheme consisting of a pentavalent vaccine with whole-cell pertussis component (wP) plus IPV/OPV vaccines to a scheme with a hexavalent vaccine with acellular pertussis component (aP) and IPV (Hexaxim®) from a societal perspective. Cost data were collected from a variety of sources including national estimates and previous vaccine studies. All costs were expressed in 2017 prices (US$ 1.00 = $Ch 666.26). RESULTS: The overall costs associated with the vaccination scheme (4 doses of pentavalent vaccine plus 1 dose IPV and 3 doses OPV) from a societal perspective was estimated to be US$ 12.70 million, of which US$ 8.84 million were associated with the management of adverse events related to wP. In comparison, the cost associated with the 4-dose scheme with a hexavalent vaccine (based upon the PAHO reference price) was US$ 19.76 million. The cost of switching to the hexavalent vaccine would be an additional US$ 6.45 million. Overall, depending on the scenario, the costs of switching to the hexavalent scheme would range from an additional US$ 2.62 million to US$ 6.45 million compared with the current vaccination scheme. CONCLUSIONS: The switch to the hexavalent vaccine schedule in Chile would lead to additional acquisition costs, which would be partially offset by improved logistics, and a reduction in adverse events associated with the current vaccines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7147015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71470152020-04-18 Valuing the cost of improving Chilean primary vaccination: a cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine Olivera, Ignacio Grau, Carlos Dibarboure, Hugo Torres, Juan Pablo Mieres, Gustavo Lazarov, Luis Alvarez, Fabián P. Yescas, Juan Guillermo López BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The phased withdrawal of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and the introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) is central to the polio ‘end-game’ strategy. METHODS: We analyzed the cost implications in Chile of a switch from the vaccination scheme consisting of a pentavalent vaccine with whole-cell pertussis component (wP) plus IPV/OPV vaccines to a scheme with a hexavalent vaccine with acellular pertussis component (aP) and IPV (Hexaxim®) from a societal perspective. Cost data were collected from a variety of sources including national estimates and previous vaccine studies. All costs were expressed in 2017 prices (US$ 1.00 = $Ch 666.26). RESULTS: The overall costs associated with the vaccination scheme (4 doses of pentavalent vaccine plus 1 dose IPV and 3 doses OPV) from a societal perspective was estimated to be US$ 12.70 million, of which US$ 8.84 million were associated with the management of adverse events related to wP. In comparison, the cost associated with the 4-dose scheme with a hexavalent vaccine (based upon the PAHO reference price) was US$ 19.76 million. The cost of switching to the hexavalent vaccine would be an additional US$ 6.45 million. Overall, depending on the scenario, the costs of switching to the hexavalent scheme would range from an additional US$ 2.62 million to US$ 6.45 million compared with the current vaccination scheme. CONCLUSIONS: The switch to the hexavalent vaccine schedule in Chile would lead to additional acquisition costs, which would be partially offset by improved logistics, and a reduction in adverse events associated with the current vaccines. BioMed Central 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7147015/ /pubmed/32272920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05115-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Olivera, Ignacio
Grau, Carlos
Dibarboure, Hugo
Torres, Juan Pablo
Mieres, Gustavo
Lazarov, Luis
Alvarez, Fabián P.
Yescas, Juan Guillermo López
Valuing the cost of improving Chilean primary vaccination: a cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine
title Valuing the cost of improving Chilean primary vaccination: a cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine
title_full Valuing the cost of improving Chilean primary vaccination: a cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine
title_fullStr Valuing the cost of improving Chilean primary vaccination: a cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine
title_full_unstemmed Valuing the cost of improving Chilean primary vaccination: a cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine
title_short Valuing the cost of improving Chilean primary vaccination: a cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine
title_sort valuing the cost of improving chilean primary vaccination: a cost minimization analysis of a hexavalent vaccine
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32272920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05115-7
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveraignacio valuingthecostofimprovingchileanprimaryvaccinationacostminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccine
AT graucarlos valuingthecostofimprovingchileanprimaryvaccinationacostminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccine
AT dibarbourehugo valuingthecostofimprovingchileanprimaryvaccinationacostminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccine
AT torresjuanpablo valuingthecostofimprovingchileanprimaryvaccinationacostminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccine
AT mieresgustavo valuingthecostofimprovingchileanprimaryvaccinationacostminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccine
AT lazarovluis valuingthecostofimprovingchileanprimaryvaccinationacostminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccine
AT alvarezfabianp valuingthecostofimprovingchileanprimaryvaccinationacostminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccine
AT yescasjuanguillermolopez valuingthecostofimprovingchileanprimaryvaccinationacostminimizationanalysisofahexavalentvaccine