Cargando…

Effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study

BACKGROUND: Recruiting of sufficient numbers of donors of blood products is vital worldwide. In this study we assessed the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of telephone calls and SMS reminders for re-recruitment of inactive blood donors. METHODS: This single-centre, non-blinded, parallel randomised c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ou-Yang, Jian, Bei, Chun-Hua, Liang, Hua-Qin, He, Bo, Chen, Jin-Yan, Fu, Yong-Shui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32276613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08594-9
_version_ 1783520341651357696
author Ou-Yang, Jian
Bei, Chun-Hua
Liang, Hua-Qin
He, Bo
Chen, Jin-Yan
Fu, Yong-Shui
author_facet Ou-Yang, Jian
Bei, Chun-Hua
Liang, Hua-Qin
He, Bo
Chen, Jin-Yan
Fu, Yong-Shui
author_sort Ou-Yang, Jian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recruiting of sufficient numbers of donors of blood products is vital worldwide. In this study we assessed the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of telephone calls and SMS reminders for re-recruitment of inactive blood donors. METHODS: This single-centre, non-blinded, parallel randomised controlled trial in Guangzhou, China included 11,880 inactive blood donors whose last donation was between January 1 and June 30, 2014. The donors were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups (telephone call or short message service [SMS] communications) or to a control group without intervention. SMS messages with altruistic appeal were adopted in the SMS group; in addition to altruistic appeal, reasons for deferral of blood donation were also asked in the telephone group. All participants were followed up for 1 year. The primary outcome was re-donation rate, and rates in different groups were compared by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). Secondary outcomes were the self-reported deterrents. Other outcomes included the re-donation interval, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of telephone calls and SMS reminders on re-recruitment. RESULTS: ITT analysis revealed no significant differences in the re-donation rate among the three groups. ATT estimations indicated that among compliers, telephone calls significantly increased re-donation compared to both SMS reminders and no intervention. Donor return behaviour was positively associated with receiving reminders successfully, being male, older age, and previous donation history. The SMS reminder prompted donors to return sooner than no reminder within 6 months, and according to ICER calculations, SMS reminders were more cost-effective than telephone calls. Donors reported time constraints as the most main causes of self-deferral in the telephone group, and altruistic appeal had a positive effect on these donors. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to reactivate inactive blood donors can be effective, with telephone calls prompting more donors to return but at a greater cost than SMS messages. SMS reminder with altruistic appeal can urge donors to re-donate sooner within 6 months than no reminder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03366441 (Reactivation of Inactive Blood Donors). Retrospectively registered 4 December 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7147048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71470482020-04-18 Effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study Ou-Yang, Jian Bei, Chun-Hua Liang, Hua-Qin He, Bo Chen, Jin-Yan Fu, Yong-Shui BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Recruiting of sufficient numbers of donors of blood products is vital worldwide. In this study we assessed the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of telephone calls and SMS reminders for re-recruitment of inactive blood donors. METHODS: This single-centre, non-blinded, parallel randomised controlled trial in Guangzhou, China included 11,880 inactive blood donors whose last donation was between January 1 and June 30, 2014. The donors were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups (telephone call or short message service [SMS] communications) or to a control group without intervention. SMS messages with altruistic appeal were adopted in the SMS group; in addition to altruistic appeal, reasons for deferral of blood donation were also asked in the telephone group. All participants were followed up for 1 year. The primary outcome was re-donation rate, and rates in different groups were compared by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). Secondary outcomes were the self-reported deterrents. Other outcomes included the re-donation interval, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of telephone calls and SMS reminders on re-recruitment. RESULTS: ITT analysis revealed no significant differences in the re-donation rate among the three groups. ATT estimations indicated that among compliers, telephone calls significantly increased re-donation compared to both SMS reminders and no intervention. Donor return behaviour was positively associated with receiving reminders successfully, being male, older age, and previous donation history. The SMS reminder prompted donors to return sooner than no reminder within 6 months, and according to ICER calculations, SMS reminders were more cost-effective than telephone calls. Donors reported time constraints as the most main causes of self-deferral in the telephone group, and altruistic appeal had a positive effect on these donors. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to reactivate inactive blood donors can be effective, with telephone calls prompting more donors to return but at a greater cost than SMS messages. SMS reminder with altruistic appeal can urge donors to re-donate sooner within 6 months than no reminder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03366441 (Reactivation of Inactive Blood Donors). Retrospectively registered 4 December 2017. BioMed Central 2020-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7147048/ /pubmed/32276613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08594-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ou-Yang, Jian
Bei, Chun-Hua
Liang, Hua-Qin
He, Bo
Chen, Jin-Yan
Fu, Yong-Shui
Effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study
title Effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study
title_full Effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study
title_fullStr Effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study
title_short Effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study
title_sort effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7147048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32276613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08594-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ouyangjian effectivemethodsforreactivatinginactiveblooddonorsastratifiedrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT beichunhua effectivemethodsforreactivatinginactiveblooddonorsastratifiedrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT lianghuaqin effectivemethodsforreactivatinginactiveblooddonorsastratifiedrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT hebo effectivemethodsforreactivatinginactiveblooddonorsastratifiedrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT chenjinyan effectivemethodsforreactivatinginactiveblooddonorsastratifiedrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT fuyongshui effectivemethodsforreactivatinginactiveblooddonorsastratifiedrandomisedcontrolledstudy